https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5017-4613
References
- Klimo P, Thompson CJ, Ragel BT, Boop FA. Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature. J Neurosurg 2014;120:796–810.
- Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 2017;358:j4008.
- Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
- Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JPT, et al.; ROBIS Group. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;69:225–34.
- Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:15.
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; 2021. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook [last accessed 2 Aug 2021].
- Shorten A, Shorten B. What is meta-analysis? Evid Based Nurs 2013;16:3–4.
- Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:210.
- Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Jordan Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18:5.
- Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al.; PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;4:1.
- Correlation and Regression | The BMJ. The BMJ | The BMJ: Leading General Medical Journal. Research. Education. Comment; 2020. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-readers/publications/statistics-square-one/11-correlation-and-regression [last accessed 12 Sep 2021].
- PROSPERO; 2021. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ [last accessed 15 Sep 2021].
- Research Registry. Research Registry; 2021. Available from: https://www.researchregistry.com/ [last accessed 15 Sep 2021].
- Khan NR, Saad H, Oravec CS, et al. A review of industry funding in randomized controlled trials published in the neurosurgical literature – the elephant in the room. Neurosurgery 2018;83:890–7.
- Farrah K, Young K, Tunis MC, Zhao L. Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols. Syst Rev 2019;8:280.
- Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629–34.
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71.
- Gagnier JJ, Kellam PJ. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:e771–7.
- Lee S-Y, Sagoo H, Whitehurst K, et al. Compliance of systematic reviews in plastic surgery with the PRISMA statement. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016;18:101–5.
- O’Donohoe TJ, Dhillon R, Bridson TL, Tee J. Reporting quality of systematic review abstracts published in leading neurosurgical journals: a research on research study. Neurosurg 2019;85:1–10.
- PRISMA; 2021. Available from: http://www.prisma-statement.org/Endorsement/PRISMAEndorsers [last accessed 17 May 2021].