EDITORIAL Rehabilitation and the neurosurgeon

References

• Gentleman D. Preventing secondary brain damage after head injury: a muti-disciplinary challenge. Injury 1990;21:305–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chesnut R/VI, Marshall LF, Klauber MR, Blunt BA, Baldwin N, Eisenberg HM, et al. The role of second-ary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury. I Trauma, 1993;34:216–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gentleman D, Dearden M, Midgley S, Maclean D. Guidelines for resuscitation and transfer of patients with serious head injury. BMI 1993;307:547–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Becker DP, Miller JD, Ward JD, Greenberg RP, Young HF, Sakalas R. The outcome from severe head injury with early diagnosis and intensive management. Neurosurg 1977;47:491–502.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale G, Galbraith S, Murray, Ward P, Gentle-man D, McKean M. Management of traumatic in-tracranial haematomas. BMI 1982;285:1695–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bricolo AP, Pasut LM. Extradural haematoma: to-ward zero mortality Neurosurgery 1984;14:8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Steward 0. Reorganisation of neural connections fol-lowing CNS trauma: principles and experimental paradigms. I Neurotrauma 1989;6: 99–152.
   Google Scholar
• Gentleman D. Growth and repair after injury of the central nervous system: yesterday, today, and tomor-row. Injury, 1994;25:571–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chamberlain MA. Head injury—the challenge. In: Chamberlain MA, Neumann VC, Tennant A (eds) Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation. London: Chap-man & Hall, 1995;3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain MA. (Chairman). The Ideal Management of Head Injury. Leeds: West Yorkshire Working Party Report, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson R, Gleave J. Counting the people disabled by head injury. Injury, 1987;18:7–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colohan AR, Oyesiku NM. Moderate head injury: an overview. I Neurotrauma, 1992;9 (suppl): S259–64.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston MG, Brooks DN, Bond MR. Patient out-come in the year following severe head injury and relatives' psychiatric and social functioning. I Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1985;48:876–81.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay LE, Bernstein BA, Chapman PE et al. Early intervention in severe head injury: long term benefits of formalised program. Arch Phys Med Rehab, 1992;73:635–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope DN, Cole JR, Hall KM, Barkan H. Brain injury: analysis of outcome in a post-acute rehabilitation system. Part 1: general analysis. Brain Injury, 1991;5: 111–25.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks N. The effectiveness of post-acute rehabili-tation. Brain Injury, 1991;5:103–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aronow HU. Rehabilitation effectiveness with severe brain injury: translating research into policy. I Head Trauma Rehabil, 1987;2:24–36.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe KM, Massagli TL, Martin KM, Rivara JB, Fay GC, Polissar NL. Pediatric traumatic brain injury: acute and rehabilitation costs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1993;74:681–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazmanian PE, Kreutzer JS, Devany CW, Martin KO. A survey of accredited and other rehabilitation facilities: education, training, and cognitive rehabili-tation in brain-injury programmes. Brain Injury, 1993;7:319–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong PP, Dornan J, Schentag CT, Ip R, Keating M. Statistical profile of tramatic brain injury: a Canadian rehabilitation population. Brain Injury, 1993;7:283–94.
   Google Scholar
• Fearnside MR, Cook RJ, McDougall P, Lewis WA. The Westmead Head Injury Project. Physical and social outcomes following severe head injury. Br Neurosurg, 1993;7:643–50.
   Google Scholar
• Groswasser Z. A national service: coma to com-munity. In: Chamberlain MA, Neumann VC, Ten-nant A (Eds) Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation London: Chapman & Hall, 1995;25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen A-L, Teasdale T. A clinically and neuro-physiologically led post-acute rehabilitation pro-gramme. In: Chamberlain MA, Neumann VC, Tennant A (eds) Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation. London: Chapman & Hall, 1995;88–98.
   Google Scholar
• Finset A. Subacute brain injury rehabilitation: a pro-gram description and a study of staff program evalu-ation. Scand J Rehab Med, 1992;26:25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann VC. Principles and practice of treatment. In: Chamberlain MA, Neumann VC, Tennant A (eds) Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation. London: Chap-man & Hall, 1995, 105–18.
   Google Scholar
• McKinlay WW, Pentland B. Developing rehabilitation services for the head injured: a UK perspective. Brain Inj, 1987;1:3–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scottish Home and Health Department. Medical re-habilitation: the pattern for the future (the Mair report). Edinburgh: HMSO, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Regional Health Authority Advisory Com-mittee on Disability. Services for people with disability in the Northern Region. Newcastle upon Tyne, Northern Regional Health Authority, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy LD, McMillan TM, Greenwood RJ, Brooks DN, Morris JR, Dunn G. Services for severely head injured patients in north London and environs. Brain Inj 1990;4:95–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cockburn JM, Gatherer A. Facilities for rehabilitation of adults after head injury. Clin Rehabil 1988;2:315–8.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes M. A regional service: developing a head injury service. In: Chamberlain MA, Neumann VC, Tennant A (eds) Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation. London: Chapman & Hall, 1995,37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks N, Campsie L, Symington C, Beatiie A, McKinlay W. The five year outcome of severe blunt head injury: a relative's view. I Neurol Neurosurg Psy-chiatry, 1986;49:764–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope DN, Hall KA. Head injury rehabilitation: benefits of early intervention. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1982;63:433–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland B, Barnes M. Staffing provision for early head injury rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil, 1988;2:309–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hoegh S-M. Working together: reflections on foster-ing an integrated service network for individuals with brain injury. In: Finlayson MAJ, Garner SH (eds) Brain Injury Rehabilitation: clinical considerations Balti-more: Williams & Wilkins, 1994;393–421.
   Google Scholar
• Tuel SM, Presty SK, Meythaler JM, Heinemann AW, Katz RT. Functional improvement in severe head injury after readmission for rehabilitation. Brain Inj 1992;6:363–72.
   Google Scholar
• Stern JM, Groswasser Z, Alis R, Geva N, Hochberg J, Stern B et al. Day Center experience in rehabilitation of craniocerebral injured patients. Scand J Rehab Med, 1985 (Suppl);12: 53–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Policies on the management of patients with head injury: the experience of the Oxford region. Clin Rehabil, 1991;5:141–55.
   Google Scholar
• Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet, 1982;i:480–7.
   Google Scholar
• Conzen M, Ebel H, Swart E, Skreczek W, Dette M, Oppel F. Long-term neuropsychological outcome after severe head injury with good recovery. Brain Inj, 1992;6:45–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ditunno JF Jr. Functional assessment measures in CNS trauma. I Neurotrauma, 1992;9 (Suppl):S301–5.
   Google Scholar
• Cook L, Smith DS, Truman G. Using Functional Independence Measure profiles as an index of out-come in the rehabilitation of brain-injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1994;75:390–3.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston MV, Hall KM. Outcomes evaluation in TBI Rehabilitation. Part 1: overview and general princi-ples. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1994;75 (Special Num-ber):SC1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Pentland B, McPherson K. An attempt to measure the effectiveness of early brain injury rehabilitation. Hlth Bull, 1994;52:438–45.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks N. Defining outcome. Brain Inj 1989;3:325–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teasdale G. Head injuries are badly managed in acci-dent and emergency departments and neurosurgeons are partly to blame. Arch Emerg Med, 1984;3:123–34.
   Google Scholar