583
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Broad Impacts and Narrow Perspectives: Passing the Buck on Science and Social Impacts

Pages 183-198 | Published online: 23 Dec 2009

References

  • Beesley , L. G. A. 2003 . Science policy in changing times: Are governments poised to take full advantage of an institution in transition? . Research Policy , 32 (8) : 1519 – 31 .
  • Belanger , D. O. 1998 . Enabling American innovation: Engineering and the National Science Foundation , West Lafayette, IN : Purdue University Press .
  • Boardman , C. and Ponomariov , B. Forthcoming . “ The cooperative mission of defense R&D in the US: Detecting consistency and change in the roles of the federal laboratories ” . In Re‐evaluating defense R&D and innovation dynamics , Edited by: James , A. Cheltenham, , UK : Edward Elgar Press .
  • Bozeman , B. 1986 . Straight arrow science policy and its dangers . IEEE Engineering Management Review , 14 (1) : 25 – 30 .
  • Bozeman , B. and Boardman , C. 2003 . Managing the new multipurpose, multidiscipline university research center: Institutional innovation in the academic community , Washington, DC : IBM Endowment for the Business of Government .
  • Bozeman , B. and Boardman , C. 2004 . The NSF Engineering Research Centers and the university–industry research revolution: A brief history featuring an interview with Erich Bloch . The Journal of Technology Transfer , 29 (3–4) : 365 – 75 .
  • Bozeman , B. and Hirsch , P. 2005 . Science ethics as a bureaucratic problem: IRBs, rules, and failures of control . Policy Sciences , 38 (4) : 269 – 91 .
  • Bozeman , B. and Mitroff , I. , eds. Managed Science Policy symposium . Public Administration Review . Vol. 39 (2) , pp. 109 – 36 .
  • Bozeman , B. and Sarewitz , D. 2005 . Public values and public failure in US science policy . Science and Public Policy , 32 (2) : 119 – 36 .
  • Bozeman , B. and Sarewitz , D. Forthcoming . “ Public value mapping: The marriage of choice and evaluation ” . In Minerva
  • Bozeman , B. , Slade , C. and Hirsch , P. 2009 . Undertanding bureaucracy in health science ethics: Toward a better institutional review board . American Journal of Public Health , 99 (9) : 1549 – 56 .
  • Brown , C. , Propst , S. and Woolley , M. 2004 . Report: Helping researchers make the case for science . Science Communication , 25 (3) : 294 – 303 .
  • Bush , V. 1945 . Science the endless frontier: A report to the President , Washington, DC : US Government Printing Office .
  • Chemical and Engineering News . 1977 . NSF kills RANN in aim to reunite agency . Chemical and Engineering News , 55 (36) : 6
  • Chubin , D. E. and Hackett , E. J. 1990 . Peerless science: Peer review and US science policy , Albany, NY : State University of New York Press .
  • Corley , E. A. , Boardman , C. and Bozeman , B. 2006 . Design and the management of multi‐institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies . Research Policy , 35 (7) : 975 – 93 .
  • De Solla Price , D. 1965 . Little science, big science , New York : Columbia University Press .
  • Foltz , F. A. 2000 . The ups and downs of peer review: Making funding choices for science . Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society , 20 (6) : 427 – 40 .
  • Franks , S. E. R. , Peach , C. , McDonnell , J. and Thorrold , A. 2005 . Broader impact: Guidance for scientists about education and public outreach . EOS Trans AGU , 86 (12) : 121 – 9 .
  • Frodeman , R. and Holbrook , J. B. 2007 . Science’s social effects . Issues in Science and Technology , : 28 – 30 .
  • Goldbeck‐Wood , S. 1999 . Evidence on peer review—scientific quality control or smokescreen? . British Medical Journal , 318 : 44 – 5 .
  • Green , R. and Lepkowski , W. 2006 . A forgotten model for purposeful science . Issues in Science and Technology , 22 (2) : 69 – 73 .
  • Holbrook , J. B. 2005 . Assessing the science‐society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation’s second merit review criterion . Technology in Society , 27 : 437 – 51 .
  • Kleinman , D.L. 1998 . Beyond the Science Wars: Contemplating the democratization of science . Politics and the Life Sciences , 17 (2) : 133 – 45 .
  • Latour , B. and Woolgar , S. 1979 . Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts , Los Angeles, CA : Sage .
  • Marburger , J. H. 2005 . Wanted: Better benchmarks . Science , 308 (5725) : 1087
  • McCormick , A. 2000 . The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education , 2000 edition , Menlo Park, CA : The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching .
  • Mervis , J. 2001 . NSF scores low on using own criteria . Science , 291 (5513) : 2533 – 5 .
  • National Academy of Public Administration . A study of the National Science Foundation’s criteria for project selection. Report . February .
  • National Research Council . 1976 . Social and behavioral science programs in the National Science Foundation , Washington, DC : NAS .
  • National Science Board . Report to the National Science Board on the National Science Foundation’s merit review process, fiscal year 2005 . March . NSB‐06‐21
  • National Science Board . Report to the National Science Board on the National Science Foundation’s merit review process, fiscal year 2006 . March . NSB‐07‐22
  • National Science Board . Report to the National Science Board on the National Science Foundation’s merit review process, fiscal year 2007 . June . NSB‐08‐47
  • National Science Board . Report to the National Science Board on the National Science Foundation’s merit review process, fiscal year 2008 . May . NSB‐09‐43
  • National Science Foundation . Report of the Advisory Committee for GPRA performance assessment . NSF 04‐216
  • National Science Foundation . Report of the Advisory Committee for GPRA performance assessment . NSF 05‐210
  • National Science Foundation . NSF Strategic Plan for FY 2006‐2011: Investing in America’s future . NSF 06‐48
  • National Science Foundation . Report of the Advisory Committee for GPRA performance assessment . NSF 06‐206
  • Pickering , A. 1992 . Science as practice and culture , Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press .
  • Pielke , R. A. Jr and Byerly , R. Jr. 1998 . Beyond basic and applied . Physics Today , 51 (2) : 42 – 6 .
  • Polanyi , M. 1962 . The Republic of Science: Its political and economic theory . Minerva , 1 (54) : 54 – 73 .
  • Rip , A. 1994 . The Republic of Science in the 1990s . Higher Education , 28 (1) : 1573
  • Sarewitz , D. 1996 . Frontiers of illusion: Science, technology, and the politics of progress , Philadelphia, PA : Temple University Press .
  • Scott , A. 2007 . Peer review and the relevance of science . Futures , 39 (7) : 827 – 45 .
  • Srivastava , C. V. , Towery , N. D. and Zuckerman , B. 2007 . Challenges and opportunities for research portfolio analysis, management, and evaluation . Research Evaluation , 16 (3) : 152 – 6 .
  • Stokes , D. 1997 . Pasteur’s quadrant , Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press .
  • Tretkoff , E. 2007 . NSF’s “broader impacts” criterion gets mixed reviews . American Physical Society News , 16 (6) [accessed 30 April 2008]. Available from http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200706/nsf.cfm; INTERNET
  • Uriarte , M. , Ewing , H. A. , Eviner , V. T. and Weathers , K. C. 2007 . Constructing a broader and more inclusive value system in science . BioScience , 57 (1) : 71 – 8 .
  • US Comptroller General . 1977 . Opportunities for improved management at RANN , Washington, DC : US General Accounting Office Printing Office .
  • Weinberg , A. 1963 . Criteria for scientific choice . Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society , 20 (6) : 427 – 40 .
  • Weinberg , A. 1972 . Science and trans‐science . Minerva , 12 (2) : 209 – 22 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.