507
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Taking the “Soft Impacts” of Technology into Account: Broadening the Discourse in Research Practice

Pages 301-316 | Published online: 23 Dec 2009

References

  • Bijker , W. E. and Law , J. , eds. 1992 . Shaping technology/building society , Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
  • Boenink , M. 2008 . “ Genetic diagnostics for hereditary breast cancer—displacement of uncertainty and responsibility ” . In Genetics from laboratory to society , Edited by: Vries , G. de and Horstman , K. Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan .
  • Boenink , M. and van der Burg , S. 2009 . “ Informed decision making about predictive DNA tests: Arguments for more public visibility of personal evaluations about the good life ” . In Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy forthcoming. Available online from http://www.springerlink.com/content/y4mg624404mj4758/; INTERNET
  • Borgmann , A. 1984 . Technology and the character of contemporary life , Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
  • Briggle , A. 2008a . A framework for understanding Eros online . Communication and Ethics in Society , 6 (3) : 216 – 32 .
  • Briggle , A. 2008b . Real friends: How the internet can foster friendship . Ethics and Information Technology , 10 (1) : 71 – 9 .
  • Campbell , D. F. J. 2003 . “ The evaluation of university research in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, Germany and Austria ” . In Learning from science and technology policy evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe , Edited by: Shapira , P. and Kuhlmann , S. 98 – 131 . Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar Publishing .
  • Collingridge , D. 1980 . The social control of technology , London : Pinter Publishers .
  • Fisher , E. 2005 . Lessons learned from the ELSI program: Planning societal implications research for the National Nanotechnology Program . Technology in Society , 27 : 321 – 8 .
  • Fisher , E. , Mahajan , R. L. and Mitcham , C. 2006 . Midstream modulation of technology: Governance from within . Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society , 26 (6) : 485 – 96 .
  • Frodeman , R. and Holbrook , J. B. 2007 . Science’s social effects . Issues in Science and Technology , : 28 – 30 .
  • Frodeman , R. and Mitcham , C. 2000 . Beyond the social contract myth . Issues in science and technology , Available from http://www.issues.org/16.4/p_frodeman.htm; INTERNET
  • Gibbons , M. 1999 . Science’s new social contract with society . Nature , 402 : 201 – 3 .
  • Grin , J. and Grunwald , A. , eds. 2000 . Vision assessment: Shaping technology in 21st century society , Berlin : Springer‐Verlag .
  • Grunwald , A. 1999 . Technology assessment or ethics of technology? Reflections on technology development between social sciences and philosophy . Ethical Perspectives , 6 (2) : 170 – 82 .
  • Hansson , S. O. 2003 . Ethical criteria of risk acceptance . Erkenntnis , 59 (3) : 291 – 309 .
  • Hemlin , S. and Rasmussen , S. B. 2006 . The shift in academic control . Science, Technology & Human Values , 31 (2) : 173 – 98 .
  • Holbrook , J. B. 2005 . Assessing the science–society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation’s second merit review criterion . Technology in Society , 27 (4) : 437 – 51 .
  • Ihde , D. 1990 . Technology and the lifeworld , Bloomington, IN : Indiana University Press .
  • Khushf , G. 1997 . Why bioethics needs the philosophy of medicine: Some implications of reflections on concepts of health and disease . Theoretical Medicine , 18 (1–2) : 145 – 64 .
  • Khushf , G. 2007 . An agenda for future debate on concepts of health and disease . Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy , 10 (1) : 19 – 27 .
  • Latour , B. 1996 . Aramis or the love of technology , Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
  • MacIntyre , A. 1981 . After virtue: A study in moral theory , Notre Dame, IN : University of Notre Dame Press .
  • Mitcham , C. and Frodeman , R. 2002 . The plea for balance in the public funding of science . Technology in Society , 24 (1–2) : 83 – 92 .
  • Mol , A. 2002 . The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice , Durham, NC : Duke University Press .
  • Shapira , P. and Kuhlmann , S. , eds. 2003 . Learning from science and technology policy evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe , Cheltenham : Edward Elgar Publishing .
  • Swierstra , T. and Jelsma , J. 2006 . Responsibility without moralism in technoscientific design practice . Science, Technology & Human Values , 31 (3) : 309 – 32 .
  • Teuber , A. 1990 . Justifying risk . Daedalus , 119 (4) : 1 – 20 .
  • Tversky , A. and Kahneman , D. 1981 . The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice . Science , 211 (4481) : 453 – 8 .
  • van de Poel , I. 2008 . How should we do nanoethics? A network approach for discerning ethical issues in nanotechnology . Nanoethics , 2 : 25 – 38 .
  • van der Burg , S. 2009 . Imagining the future of photoacoustic mammography . Science and Engineering Ethics , 15 (1) : 97 – 111 .
  • Verbeek , P. 2005 . What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design , University Park, PA : Pennsylvania State University Press .
  • Verbeek , P. 2008 . Obstetric ultrasound and the technological mediation of morality: A postphenomenological analysis . Human Studies , 31 (1) : 11 – 26 .
  • Zwart , S. D. , van de Poel , I. , van Mil , H. and Brumsen , M. 2006 . A network approach for distinguishing ethical issues in research and development . Science and Engineering Ethics , 12 (4) : 662 – 84 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.