How Many Alternatives? Partitions Pose Problems for Predictions and Diagnoses

References

• Bonini , N. and Caverni , J.‐P. 1995 . The “catch‐all underestimation bias”: Availability hypothesis vs. category redefinition hypothesis . Current Psychology of Cognition , 14 (33) : 301 – 22 .
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine . 2007 . University of Toronto Available from http://www.cebm.utoronto.ca/practise/ca/diagnosis/important.htm;INTERNET
   Google Scholar
• Clemen , R. T. and Ulu , C. 2008 . Interior additivity and subjective probability assessment of continuous variables . Management Science , 54 (4) : 835 – 51 .
   Google Scholar
• Connolly , T. 1987 . Decision theory, reasonable doubt, and the utility of erroneous acquittals . Law and Human Behavior , 11 (2) : 101 – 12 .
   Google Scholar
• DeKay , M. L. 1996 . The difference between Blackstone‐like error ratios and probabilistic standards of proof . Law and Social Inquiry , 21 (1) : 95 – 132 .
   Google Scholar
• Dubé‐Rioux , L. and Russo , J. E. 1988 . An availability bias in professional judgment . Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 1 (4) : 223 – 37 .
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff , B. , Slovic , P. and Lichtenstein , S. 1978 . Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Performance , 4 (2) : 330 – 44 .
   Google Scholar
• Fox , C. R. and Clemen , R. T. 2005 . Subjective probability assessment in decision analysis: Partition dependence and bias toward the ignorance prior . Management Science , 51 (9) : 1417 – 32 .
   Google Scholar
• Fox , C. R. and Levav , J. 2004 . Partition‐edit‐count: Naïve extensional reasoning in judgment of conditional probabilities . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 133 (4) : 626 – 42 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox , C. R. and Rottenstreich , Y. 2003 . Partition priming in judgment under uncertainty . Psychological Science , 13 (3) : 195 – 200 .
   Google Scholar
• Grant , S. and Quiggin , J. Conjectures, refutations and discoveries: incorporating new knowledge in models of belief and decision under uncertainty . Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on the Foundations and Applications of Utility, Risk and Decision Theory (FUR XI—Paris), under the joint auspices of the Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers (ENSAM) and the Ecole Spéciale des Travaux Publics (ESTP) . July 2 , Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt , E. R. and Castellan , N. J. Jr . 1988 . Probability and category identification in the fault tree paradigm . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Performance , 14 (1) : 112 – 31 .
   Google Scholar
• Rottenstreich , Y. and Tversky , A. 1997 . Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory . Psychological Review , 104 (2) : 406 – 15 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Russo , J. E. and Kolzow , K. J. 1994 . Where is the fault in fault trees? . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Performance , 20 (1) : 17 – 32 .
   Google Scholar
• See , K. E. , Fox , C. R. and Rottenstreich , Y. S. 2006 . Between ignorance and truth: Partition dependence and learning in judgment under uncertainty . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory Cognition , 32 (6) : 1385 – 402 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shafer , G. 1976 . A mathematical theory of evidence , Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sloman , S. , Rottenstreich , Y. , Wisniewski , E. , Hadjichristidis , C. and Fox , C. R. 2004 . Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory Cognition , 30 (3) : 573 – 82 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smithson , M. 2006 . Scale construction from a decisional viewpoint . Minds and Machines , 16 (3) : 339 – 64 .
   Google Scholar
• Smithson , M. , Bartos , T. G. and Takemura , K. 2000 . Human judgment under sample space ignorance . Risk Decision and Policy , 5 (2) : 135 – 50 .
   Google Scholar
• Smithson , M. , Gracik , L. and Deady , S. 2007 . Guilty, not guilty, or …? Multiple verdict options in jury verdict choices . Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 20 (5) : 481 – 98 .
   Google Scholar
• Smithson , M. and Segale , C. 2009 . Partition priming in judgments of imprecise probabilities . Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice , 3 (1) : 169 – 82 .
   Google Scholar
• Smithson , M. and Verkuilen , J. 2006 . A better lemon‐squeezer? Maximum likelihood regression with beta‐distributed dependent variables . Psychological Methods , 11 (1) : 54 – 71 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steadman , H. J. , Silver , E. , Monahan , J. , Appelbaum , P. S. , Clark Robbins , P. , Mulvey , E. P. , Grisso , T. , Roth , L. H. and Banks , S. 2000 . A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools . Law and Human Behavior , 24 (1) : 83 – 100 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tversky , A. and Kahneman , D. 1974 . Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases . Science , 185 (4157) : 1124 – 31 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky , A. and Koehler , D. 1994 . Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability . Psychological Review , 101 (4) : 547 – 67 .
   Google Scholar
• Walley , P. 1991 . Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities , London : Chapman Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Walley , P. 1996 . Inferences from multinomial data: Learning about a bag of marbles (with discussion) . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B , 58 (1) : 3 – 57 .
   Google Scholar