References
- Anderson , Chris . 2006a . The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more , New York : Hyperion .
- Anderson , Chris . 2006b . “ Wisdom of the crowds ” . In Nature online [cited 29 May 2009] Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04992.html; INTERNET
- arXiv. n.d. The arXiv endorsement system [cited 2 August 2009]. Available from http://arxiv.org/help/endorsement; INTERNET
- Biagioli , Mario . 2002 . From book censorship to academic peer review . Emergences , 12 (1) : 11 – 45 .
- Blair , Carole , Brown , Julie R. and Baxter , Leslie A. 1994 . Disciplining the feminine . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 80 (4) : 383 – 409 .
- Brownlee , Christen . 2006 . Peer review under the microscope . Science News , 170 (25) : 392 – 3 .
- Burnham , John C. 1990 . The evolution of editorial peer review . Journal of the American Medical Association , 263 (10) : 1323 – 9 .
- Campanario , Juan Miguel . 1998 . Peer review for journals as it stands today, part 2 . Science Communication , 19 (4) : 277 – 306 .
- Campbell , Phillip . 2006 . “ Nature’s peer review trial ” . In Nature online [cited 13 July 2009] Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/; INTERNET
- Cartwright , Jon . 2009 . “ Fledgling site challenges arXiv server ” . In Physicsworld.com [cited 2 August 2009] Available from http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/39845; INTERNET
- Davidson , Cathy . 2009 . “Research”: How peer review counts and doesn’t ” . In Cat in the stack [cited 29 May 2009] Available from http://www.hastac.org/node/2105; INTERNET
- Fabiato , A. 1994 . Anonymity of reviewers . Cardiovascular Research , 28 (8) : 1134 – 9 .
- Falkow , Sally . n.d. . “ The flip side of corporate blogging ” . In The Navigator [cited 24 August 2010] Available from http://navigator.bacons.com/CURRENT/flip_side_of_blogging.asp; INTERNET
- Godlee , Fiona . 2000 . “ The ethics of peer review ” . In Ethical issues in biomedical publication , Edited by: Jones , Anne Hudson and McLellan , Faith . 59 – 84 . Baltimore, MD : Johns Hopkins University Press .
- Grant , Bob . 2009 . Merck published fake journal . TheScientist.com [cited 29 May 2009] , Available from http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55671/; INTERNET
- Guédon , Jean‐Claude and Siemens , Raymond . 2002 . The credibility of electronic publishing: Peer review and pmprint . TEXT Technology , 11 (1) : 17 – 35 .
- Hall , Donald . 2002 . The academic self: An owner’s manual , Columbus : Ohio State University Press .
- Harnad , Stevan . 1998 . Learned inquiry and the net: The role of peer review, peer commentary and copyright . Learned Publishing , 11 (4) : 283 – 92 .
- Jensen , Michael . 2007 . Authority 3.0: Friend or foe to scholars? . Journal of Scholarly Publishing , 39 (1) : 297 – 307 .
- Koop , Thomas and Poschl , Ulrich . 2006 . “ Systems: An open, two‐stage peer‐review journal ” . In Nature online [cited 13 July 2009] Available from http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04988.html; INTERNET
- Kronick , David A. 1990 . Peer review in 18th‐century scientific journalism . Journal of the American Medical Association , 263 (10) : 1321 – 2 .
- Kronick , David A. 2004 . “Devant le deluge” and other essays on early modern scientific communication , Lanham, MD : Scarecrow Press .
- Lanham , Richard A. 2006 . The economics of attention: Style and substance in the age of information , Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
- Meyers , B. 2004 . Peer review software: Has it made a mark on the world of scholarly journals? Arie Systems Corporation [cited 24 August 2010] Available from http://www.editorialmanager.de/pdfs/peerreview.pdf; INTERNET
- Modern Language Association of America . Report of the MLA task force on evaluating scholarship for tenure and promotion [cited 13 July 2009] . Available from http://www.mla.org/pdf/task_force_tenure_promo.pdf; INTERNET
- Peters , Douglas P. and Ceci , Stephen J. 2004 . “ Peer review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again ” . In Peer review: A critical inquiry , Edited by: Shatz , David . 191 – 214 . Lanham, MD : Rowman & Littlefield .
- Pöschl , Ulrich . 2004 . Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance . Learned Publishing , 17 (2) : 105 – 13 .
- Regalado , Mariana . 2007 . “ Research authority in the age of Google: Equilibrium sought ” . In Library Philosophy and Practice [cited 14 July 2009] Available from http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/regalado.htm; INTERNET
- Rennie , Drummond . 1994 . Commentary on Fabiato, A., ‘“Anonymity of reviewers” . Cardiovascular Research , 28 (8) : 1142 – 3 .
- Rennie , Drummond . 2003 . “ Editorial peer review: Its development and rationale ” . In Peer review in health sciences , Edited by: Godlee , Fiona and Jefferson , Tom . 1 – 13 . London : BMJ Books .
- Roy , Rustum and Ashburn , James R. 2001 . The perils of peer review . Nature , 414 (6862) : 393 – 4 .
- Seglen , Per O. 1997 . Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research . British Medical Journal , 314 (7079) : 497
- Shatz , David . 2004 . Peer review: A critical inquiry , Lanham, MD : Rowman & Littlefield .
- Shirky , Clay . 2008 . Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations , New York : Penguin Press .
- Smith , Alexandra . 2006 . Scientists concerned over research assessment changes . The Guardian [cited 14 July 2009] , Available from http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2006/dec/07/highereducation.researchassessmentexercise; INTERNET
- Smith , Richard . 2006 . Commentary: The power of the unrelenting impact factor—is it a force for good or harm? . International Journal of Epidemiology , 35 (5) : 1129 – 30 .
- Spier , Ray . 2002 . The history of the peer‐review process . TRENDS in Biotechnology , 20 (8) : 357 – 8 .
- Tweney , Dylan . 2003 . “ Q&A: Cory Doctorow ” . In SFGate.com [cited 2 August 2009] Available from http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2003/01/23/cdoctorow.DTL; INTERNET
- Vaidhyanathan , Siva . 2007 . “ Where is this book going? ” . In The Googlization of everything [cited 29 May 2009] Available from http://www.googlizationofeverything.com/2007/09/where_is_this_book_going.php; INTERNET
- Wardrip‐Fruin , Noah . 2008 . “ EP meta: Chapter four ” . In Grand Text Auto [cited 29 May 2009] Available from http://grandtextauto.org/2008/02/16/ep-meta-chapter-four/; INTERNET
- Waters , Lindsay . 2004 . Enemies of promise: Publishing, perishing, and the eclipse of scholarship , Chicago : Prickly Paradigm Press .
- Weller , Ann C. 2001 . Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses , Medford, NJ : Information Today .
- n.d. . “ Why viXra? ” . In viXra [cited 2 August 2009] Available from http://vixra.org/why; INTERNET
- Young , Jeffrey R. 2008 . “ Blog comments and peer review go head to head to see which makes a book better ” . In Chronicle of Higher Education [cited 29 May 2009] Available from http://chronicle.com/free/2008/01/1322n.htm; INTERNET
- Zuckerman , Harriet and Merton , Robert K. 1971 . Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalization, structure, and functions of the referee system . Minerva , 9 : 66 – 100 .