The Rightful Place of Expertise

References

• Abbott, A. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago:  University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, R. 2001. “Trust, Power and Control in Trans-Organizational Relations.” Organization Studies 22 (2): 337–365. doi:10.1177/07399863870092005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. 1973. The Coming Of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, G., and N. Stehr. 1986. The Knowledge Society: The Growing Impact of Scientific Knowledge on Social Relations. Dordrecht, NL: Reidel Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, A. 2009. “Politikwissenschaft Und Politikberatung: Reflektionen Anlässlich Der Aktuellen Krise.” Zeitschrift Für Politikberatung 2 (3): 467–484. doi:10.1007/s12392-009-0209-0.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., and J. Newman. 2017. “‘People in This Country Have Had Enough of Experts’: Brexit and the Paradoxes of Populism.” Critical Policy Studies 11 (1): 101–116. doi:10.1080/19460171.2017.1282376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collingridge, D., and C. Reeve. 1986. Science Speaks to Power. New York: St Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H., R. Evans, and M. Weinel. 2017. “STS as Science or Politics ?” Social Studies of Science 1–7. doi:10.1177/0306312717710131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corfee-Morlot, J., M. Maslin, and J. Burgess. 2007. “Global Warming in the Public Sphere.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 365 (July): 2741–2776. doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. D., and W. Rees-Mogg. 1997. The Sovereign Individual: How to Survive and Thrive during the Collapse of the Welfare State. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• De Tocqueville, A. 1835. Democracy in America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University. (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Decker, C. 2017. “Trump’s War against Elites and Expertise.” Los Angeles Times, July 27.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1997. The Division of Labor in Society. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. 1996. Impure Science : AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuerhacker, M. 2009. “Eu Water Framework Directive and Stockholm Convention: Can We Reach The Targets for Priority Substances and Persistent Organic Pollutants?.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 16(SUPPL1 : S92–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. 2017. “Is STS All Talk and No Walk?” EASST Review 36 (1): 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., and J. R. Ravetz. 1993. “Science for the Post-Normal Age.” Futures 25 (7): 739–755. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geden, O. 2016. “The Paris Agreement and the Inherent Inconsistency of Climate Policymaking.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. doi:10.1002/WCC.427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gluckman, P. 2014. “The Art of Science Advice.” Nature 507: 163–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M. E. 1995. “Scientific Expertise and European Community Regulatory Processes.” Science and Public Policy 22 (3): 183–187. doi:10.1093/spp/22.3.183.
   Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R. 1999. “The European Public Sphere and the Deficit of Democracy.” In Whose Europe?: the turn towards democracy. Sociology Review Monograph, edited by D. Smith and S. Wright, 125–146, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R. 2016. “Climate Change as a Wicked Social Problem.” Nature Geosciences 9: 562–563. doi:10.1038/ngeo2780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R. 2017. “The Problem of Expertise in Knowledge Societies.” Minerva 55 (1): 25–48. doi:10.1007/s11024-016-9308-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R. 2018. “Science and Politics in Ozone and Climate.” Comptes Rendus Geoscience. doi:10.1016/j.crte.2018.07.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1963. Wissenschaft und Technik als Ideologie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag. (1968).
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1971. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics, 62–80. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J., Pushker K., Makiko S., Valerie M.-D., Frank Ackerman, D. J. Beerling, Paul J. Hearty, et al. 2013. “Assessing ‘Dangerous Climate Change’: Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature.” PloS one 8 (12): e81648. edited by Juan A. Añel. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. 2008. “Wicked Problems in Public Policy.” Public Policy 3 (2): 101–118. doi:10.1128/MCB.00567-07.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R., and A. Wesselink. 2014. “Comparing the Role of Boundary Organizations in the Governance of Climate Change in Three EU Member States.” Environmental Science and Policy 44: 73–85. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, I. L. 2005. “Louis Hartz and the Liberal Tradition: From Consensus to Crack-Up.” Modern Age: A Conservative Review 47 (2): 201–209.
   Google Scholar
• IfG. 2016. Trust in Government Is Growing – But It Needs to Deliver. London: Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• Illich, I. 1973. Tools for Conviviality. London: Calder and Boyars.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. 1995. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. 2017. “Agreeing to Differ? A Response to Van Bouwel and Van Oudheusden.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (10): 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. 1912. Essays in Radical Empiricism. London: Longmans and Green.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2011. “Cosmopolitan Knowledge: Climate Science and Global Civic Epistemology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, edited by J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, and D. Schlosberg, 129–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.003.0009.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and H. R. Simmet. 2017. “No Funeral Bells: Public Reason in a ‘Post-Truth’ Age.” Social Studies of Science 47 (5): 751–770. doi:10.1177/0306312717731936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248. doi:10.1086/421123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, W. E. 2011. “After 50 Years, Eisenhower’s Warnings against a Scientific Elite Still Cause Consternation.” AAAS News. https://www.aaas.org/news/after-50-years-eisenhower-s-warnings-against-scientific-elite-still-cause-consternation.
   Google Scholar
• Lentsch, J., and P. Weingart. 2011. “Quality Control in the Advisory Process: Towards an Institutional Design for Robust Science Advice.” In The Politics of Scientific Advice. Institutional Design for Quality Assurance, edited by J. Lentsch and P. Weingart, 353–374. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Limoges, C. 1993. “Expert Knowledge and Decision-making in Controversy Contexts.” Public Understanding Of Science 2 (2): 417–26.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. 2001. “The Americanization of the European Left.” Journal of Democracy 12 (2): 74–87. doi:10.1353/jod.2001.0031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1979. Trust and Power. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, T. W. 2017. “What Must Be Done: Sustaining New Political Science after America’s Decades of Decline.” New Political Science 39 (4): 487–510. doi:10.1080/07393148.2017.1380281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. 2005. Dilemmas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth. Dilemmas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199274304.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. J., J. S. Fuglestvedt, P. Friedlingstein, J. Rogelj, M. J. Grubb, H. D. Matthews, R. B. Skeie, P. M. Forster, D. J. Frame, and M. R. Allen. 2017. “Emission Budgets and Pathways Consistent with Limiting Warming to 1.5°C.” Nature Geoscience 10 (10): 741–747. Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/ngeo3031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005. On the Political. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Myhre, G., D. Shindell, F.-M. Bréon, W. Collins, J. Fuglestvedt, J. Huang, D. Koch, et al. 2013. “Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.” Chapter 8: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. 1977. The Moon and the Ghetto. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, T. M. 2017. The Death of Expertise : The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pew. 2017. “Pew Research Centre.” Mixed Messages about Public Trust in Science. http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/12/08/mixed-messages-about-public-trust-in-science/
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, R., Jnr. 2007. The Honest Broker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. 2018. Brahmin Left Vs Merchant Right: Rising Inequality and the Changing Structure of Political Conflict. World Inequality Database, WID. World Working Paper Series N° 2018/7 (online only).
   Google Scholar
• Pirro, A. L. P., P. Taggart, and S. van Kessel. 2018. “The Populist Politics of Euroscepticism in Times of Crisis: Comparative Conclusions.” Politics 38 (3): 378–390. doi:10.1177/0263395718784704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richta, R. 1969. Civilization at the Crossroads. Social and Human Implications of the Scientific and Technological Revolution. White Plains, NY: International Arts and Sciences Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. 2005. Building Europe’s Parliament: Democratic Representation beyond the Nation State. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199273421.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4: 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco, P. 2017. “Most Presidents Rely on Expertise. Trump Treats Experts like the Enemy.” Washington Post, July 24.
   Google Scholar
• Rogelj, J., M. Meinshausen, J. Sedláček, and R. Knutti. 2014. “Implications of Potentially Lower Climate Sensitivity on Climate Projections and Policy.” Environmental Research Letters 9 (3): 31003. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/031003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. 2006. Democracy past and Future. edited by Samuel Moyn. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roszak, T. 1968. The Making of a Counter Culture: Reflections on the Technocratic Society and Its Youthful Opposition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D. 2009. “The Rightful Place of Science.” Issues in Science and Technology 25 (4): 89–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, E. F. 1971. Small Is Beautiful. A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London: Blond and Briggs.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. 2008. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of A Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sloman, S. A., and P. Fernbach. 2017. The Knowledge Illusion : Why We Never Think Alone. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stehr, N., and R. Grundmann. 2011. Experts: The Knowledge and Power of Expertise. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Szöcsik, E., and A. Polyakova. 2018. “Euroscepticism and the Electoral Success of the Far Right: The Role of the Strategic Interaction between Center and Far Right.” European Political Science. doi:10.1057/s41304-018-0162-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turchetti, S., and P. Roberts. 2015. The Surveillance Imperative: Geosciences during the Cold War and Beyond. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S. 2018. “Book Review: The New Power Elite: Inequality, Politics, and Greed. By Alan Shipman, June Edmunds and Bryan S. Turner.” Journal of Classical Sociology. doi:10.1177/1468795X18786387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S. P. 2010. “Normal Accidents of Expertise.” Minerva 48 (3): 239–258. doi:10.1007/s11024-010-9153-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verweij, M., M. Douglas, R. Ellis, C. Engel, F. Hendriks, S. Lohmann, S. Ney, S. Rayner, and M. Thompson. 2006. “Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World: The Case of Climate Change.” Public Administration 84 (4): 817–843. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09566.x-i1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A. M. 1972. “Science and Trans-Science.” Minerva 10 (2): 209–222. doi:10.1007/BF01682418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. 1999. “Scientific Expertise and Political Accountability: Paradoxes of Science in Politics.” Science and Public Policy 26 (3): 151–161. doi:10.3152/147154399781782437.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 1996. “May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert–Lay Knowledge Divide.” In Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, edited by S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne, 44–83. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zachary, G. P., M. M. Crow, R. Frodeman, D. H. Guston, C. Mitcham, D. R. Sarewitz, and Policy and Outcomes at Arizona State University Consortium for Science. 2013. The Rightful Place of Science: Politics. Tempe, AZ: Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes.
   Google Scholar