Asymmetry, Disagreement and Biases: Epistemic Worries about Expertise

References

• Angner, E. 2006. “Economists as Experts: Overconfidence in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1080/13501780600566271.
   Google Scholar
• Anton, T. 1969. “Policy-Making and Political Culture in Sweden.” Scandinavian Political Studies 4 (A4): 88–102. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.1969.tb00521.x.
   Google Scholar
• Arter, D. 2008. Scandinavian Politics Today. 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Backer, I. L. 2013. Loven – Hvordan blir den til? Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, J. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. 2004. “Political Liberalism and Social Epistemology.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (2): 95–130. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00008.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 2016. The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., and O. K. Pedersen. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, B. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. 2013. “22. juli-kommisjonen: Perspektiver på en fortelling.” Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift 30 (3): 243–254.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. 2017. The Power of Economists within the State. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., and C. Holst. 2017. “‘Advisory Commissions, Academic Expertise and Democratic Legitimacy: The Case of Norway.” Science and Public Policy 44 (6): 821–833. doi:10.1093/scipol/scz016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., and S. Hesstvedt. 2018. “Expertization or Greater Representation? Evidence from Norwegian Advisory Commissions.” European Politics and Society. doi:10.1080/23745118.2018.1515861.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. G., P. E. Mouritzen, and A. S. Nørgaard, eds. 2009. De store kommissioner: Vise mænd, smagsdommere eller nyttige idioter. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Christiano, T. 2012. “Rational Deliberation among Experts and Citizens.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by J. Parkinson and J. Mansbridge, 27–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H., and R. Evans. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, J., and M. Howlett. 2013. “The Dual Dynamics of Policy Advisory Systems: The Impact of Externalization and Politicization on Policy Advice.” Policy and Society 32 (3): 187–197. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. 1985. Controlling Nuclear Weapons: Democracy Versus Guardianship. Syracuse, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, T., O. Huw, S. M. Nutley, and P. C. Smith, eds. 2000. What Works? Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estlund, D. 2008. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2001. Fearless Speech. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M. 2006. “The Construction of a Global Profession.” American Journal of Sociology 112 (1): 145–194. doi:10.1086/502693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gesang, B. 2010. “Are Moral Philosophers Moral Experts?” Bioethics 24 (4): 153–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. [2001] 2011. “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?’.” In Social Epistemology: Essential Readings, edited by A. Goldman and D. Whitcomb, 109–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å., and E. Krick. 2018. “The Expertisation of Stakeholder Involvement in the EU.” In Expertization and Democracy in Europe, edited by C. Holst, M. Warat, and M. Gora, 51–70. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R. 2017. “The Problem of Expertise in Knowledge Societies.” Minerva 55 (1): 25–48. doi:10.1007/s11024-016-9308-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. [1972] 1984. “Wahrheitstheorien.” In Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, edited by J. Habermas, 129–183. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hardwig, J. 1985. “Epistemic Dependence.” Journal of Philosophy 82 (7): 3,35–349. doi:10.2307/2026523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardwig, J. 1991. “The Role of Trust in Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 88 (12): 693–708. doi:10.2307/2027007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holst, C., and A. Molander. 2017. “Public Deliberation and the Fact of Expertise: Making Experts Accountable.” Social Epistemology 31 (3): 235–250. doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1317865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holst, C., and A. Molander. Forthcoming. “Epistemic Democracy and the Role of Experts.” Contemporary Political Theory.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, A., and C. Boswell. 2015. “Comparing the Political Functions of Independent Commissions: The Case of UK Migrant Integration Policy.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 17 (1): 10–25. doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.896117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2012. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 2011. Science in a Democratic Society. New York, NY: Phrometeus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Knutsen, O., ed. 2017. The Nordic Models in Political Science: Challenged, but Still Viable? Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Krick, E. 2015. “Negotiated Expertise in Policy-Making. How Governments Use Hybrid Advisory Committees.” Science and Public Policy 42 (4): 487–500. doi:10.1093/scipol/scu069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krick, E., C. Holst, and Å. Gornitzka. Under revision. ‘Governance by Committees in Consensus Democracies.’
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. 2009. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, H. 2017. “Beyond the Fact of Disagreement: The Epistemic Turn in Deliberative Democracy.” Social Epistemology 31 (3): 277–295. doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1317868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindvall, J., and B. Rothstein. 2006. “Sweden: The Fall of the Strong State.” Scandinavian Political Studies 29 (1): 47–63. doi:10.1111/scps.2006.29.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markoff, J., and V. Montecinos. 1993. “The Ubiquitous Rise of Economists.” Journal of Public Policy 13 (1): 37–68. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00000933.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, H. 1969. “Bureaucracy and Policy Formulation in Sweden.” Scandinavian Political Studies 4 (A4): 103–116. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.1969.tb00522.x.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, H. 2011. “When Experts Argue: Explaining the Best and the Worst of Reasoning.” Argumentation 25 (3): 313–327. doi:10.1007/s10503-011-9222-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. ed. [1942] 1973. “The Normative Structure of Science.” In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, 267–278. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myrdal, G. [1930] 1953. The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petersson, O. 2015. “’Rational Politics: Commissions of Inquiry and the Referral System in Sweden.’.” In The Oxford Handbook of Swedish Politics, edited by J. Pierre, 650–661. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pincione, G., and F. Tesón. 2006. Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation: A Theory of Discourse Failure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, J. 2008. Error in Economics. Towards a More Evidence-Based Methodology. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Renå, H. 2017. “22. juli-kommisjonens analyse, vurderinger og konklusjoner – En metaanalyse av politiaksjon Utøya.” Norsk statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift 33 (1): 10–36. doi:10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2017-01-03.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. 2011. The Quality of Government. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryymin, T. 2017. Historie og politikk. Historiebruk i norsk politikkutforming etter 1945. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Schlefer, J. 2012. The Assumptions Economists Make. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. 1972. “Moral Experts.” Analysis 32 (4): 115–117. doi:10.1093/analys/32.4.115.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. 2006. Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. Forthcoming. “The Most Knowledgeable Branch.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., and R. Hastie. 2015. Wiser: Getting beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, A., and S. White. 2008. “Political Theory, Social Science, and Real Politics.” In Political Theory. Methods and Approaches, edited by D. Leopold and M. Stears, 49–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tellmann, S. M. 2016. Experts in Public Policymaking: Influential, yet Constrained. Doctoral Thesis. Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. 2005. Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tranøy, K. E. 1976. “Norms of Inquiry: Methodologies as Normative Systems.” In Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy, edited by G. Ryle, 1–15. London: Oriel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S. 2003. Liberal Democracy 3.0. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185 (4157): 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4148.340-a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. 2014. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vibert, F. 2007. The Rise of the Unelected. Democracy and the New Separation of Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. 1997. Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. 1999. “Scientific Expertise and Political Accountability.” Science and Public Policy 26 (3): 151–161. doi:10.3152/147154399781782437.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. 1979. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. London: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Zenker, F. 2011. “Experts and Bias: When Is the Interest-Based Objection to Expert Argumentation Sound?” Argumentation 25 (3): 355–370. doi:10.1007/s10503-011-9226-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar