Reflections on the (Post-)Human Condition: Towards New Forms of Engagement with the World?

References

• Alaimo, S. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S. 2016. Exposed: Environmental Politics and Pleasures in Posthuman Times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S., and S. J. Hekman, eds. 2008. Material Feminisms. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1998 [1958]. The Human Condition. 2nd ed. Introduction by M. Canovan. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atanasoski, N., and K. Vora. 2019. Surrogate Humanity: Race, Robots, and the Politics of Technological Futures. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Badmington, N., ed. 2000. Posthumanism. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Badmington, N. 2003. “Theorizing Posthumanism.” Cultural Critique 53 (1): 10–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.2003.0017.
   Google Scholar
• Badmington, N. 2004. Alien Chic: Posthumanism and the Other Within. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Banerji, D., and M. R. Paranjape, eds. 2016. Critical Posthumanism: Planetary Futures. San Francisco, CA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. 2011. Dignity in Adversity: Human Rights in Troubled Times. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bhambra, G. K. 2014. Connected Sociologies. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Bidet, J. 2002. “L’esprit du capitalisme. Questions à Luc Boltanski et Ève Chiapello.” In Les sociologues critiques du capitalisme. En hommage à Pierre Bourdieu, edited by J. Lojkine, 215–233. Paris: Collection Actuel Marx Confrontation, Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Bignall, S., S. Hemming, and D. Rigney. 2016. “Three Ecosophies for the Anthropocene: Environmental Governance, Continental Posthumanism and Indigenous Expressivism.” Deleuze Studies 10 (4): 455–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.3366/dls.2016.0239.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. 2008. Rendre la réalité inacceptable. À propos de “La production de l’idéologie dominante”. Paris: Demopolis.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. 2009. De la critique. Précis de sociologie de l’émancipation. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. 2011 [2009]. On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Translated by G. Elliott. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., J. Rennes, and S. Susen. 2014 [2010]. “The Fragility of Reality: Luc Boltanski in Conversation with Juliette Rennes and Simon Susen.” In The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’, edited by S. Susen and B. S. Turner, 591–610. Translated by S. Susen. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and È. Chiapello. 2005 [1999]. The New Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by G. Elliott. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., J. Rennes, and S. Susen. 2010. “La fragilité de la réalité. Entretien avec Luc Boltanski. Propos recueillis par Juliette Rennes et Simon Susen.” Mouvements 64: 151–166.
   Google Scholar
• Borradori, G. 2003. Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 1991. Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2006. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2011 [1994]. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013a. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013b. “Posthuman Humanities.” European Educational Research Journal 12 (1): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2015. “Posthuman Feminist Theory.” In The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory, edited by L. Disch and M. Hawkesworth, 673–688. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R., and P. Gilroy. 2016a. “Introduction.” In Conflicting Humanities, edited by R. Braidotti and P. Gilroy, 1–7. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2016a. “The Contested Posthumanities.” In Conflicting Humanities, edited by R. Braidotti and P. Gilroy, 9–45. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2016b. “The Critical Posthumanities; Or, Is Medianatures to Naturecultures as Zoe Is to Bios?” Cultural Politics 12 (3): 380–390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/17432197-3648930.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2019a. Posthuman Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2019b. “A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities.” Theory, Culture & Society 36 (6): 31–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R., and M. Fuller. 2019. “The Posthumanities in an Era of Unexpected Consequences.” Theory, Culture & Society 36 (6): 3–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419860567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R., and M. Hlavajova, eds. 2018. Posthuman Glossary. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R., and P. Gilroy, eds. 2016b. Conflicting Humanities. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R., and S. Bignall, eds. 2019. Posthuman Ecologies: Complexity and Process after Deleuze. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, C., and S. Susen. 2014. “Austerity and Its Antitheses: Practical Negations of Capitalist Legitimacy.” South Atlantic Quarterly 113 (2): 217–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2643576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, K. M. 2013. Global Civil Society and Transversal Hegemony: The Global-Contestation Nexus. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., Z. Gambetti, and L. Sabsay, eds. 2016. Vulnerability in Resistance. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., and J. A. Hall. 2017. The Paradox of Vulnerability: States, Nationalism, and the Financial Crisis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2009. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35 (2): 197–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/596640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2017. “The Future of the Human Sciences in the Age of Humans: A Note.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 39–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016642780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernilo, D. 2014. “The Idea of Philosophical Sociology.” The British Journal of Sociology 65 (2): 338–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernilo, D. 2017a. Debating Humanity: Towards a Philosophical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chernilo, D. 2017b. “The Question of the Human in the Anthropocene Debate.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 44–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016651874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiapello, È., and N. L. Fairclough. 2002. “Understanding the New Management Ideology: A Transdisciplinary Contribution from Critical Discourse Analysis and New Sociology of Capitalism.” Discourse and Society 13 (2): 185–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013002406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, N., and K. Yusoff. 2017. “Geosocial Formations and the Anthropocene.” Theory, Culture & Society 34 (2–3): 3–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416688946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, N., and Y. Gunaratnam. 2016. “Earthing the Anthropos? From ‘Socializing the Anthropocene’ to Geologizing the Social.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 146–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016661337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, B. 2008. Posthuman Metamorphosis: Narrative and Systems. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., and M. Rossini, eds. 2017. The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Posthuman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, T., C. Colebrook, and J. Miller Hillis. 2016. Twilight of the Anthropocene Idols. London: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D. R., and J. Bradley, eds. 2018. Principles of Transversality in Globalization and Education. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D. H., and S. Frost, eds. 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. 2008. Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle, Wash.: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, H. M., and E. Turpin, eds. 2015. Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among Aesthetics, Politics, Environments and Epistemologies. London: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Graef, O. 2016. “Muscular Humanities.” Presentation at the European Consortium of Humanities Institutes and Centres (ECHIC), Annual Conference, Macerata, Italy, 21–22 April.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. 2016. Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, G., and A. Mota. 2017. “Governing the Anthropocene: Agency, Governance, Knowledge.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 9–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016668535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1983 [1962]. Nietzsche and Philosophy. Translated by H. Tomlinson. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1984 [1963]. Kant’s Critical Philosophy: The Doctrine of the Faculties. Translated by H. Tomlinson and B. Habberjam. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1988 [1980]. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translation and foreword by B. Massumi. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1994 [1991]. What Is Philosophy? Translated by H. Tomlinson and G. Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Descola, P. 2009. “Human Natures.” Social Anthropology 17 (2): 145–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2009.00063.x.
   Google Scholar
• Descola, P. 2013 [2005]. Beyond Nature and Culture. Translated by J. Lloyd. Foreword by M. Sahlins. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolphijn, R., and I. van der Tuin, eds. 2012. New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, M. 2012. The Transformative Humanities: A Manifesto. Translated and edited by I. Klyukanov. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, R. 2008. Bíos: Biopolitics and Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. L. 2002. “Language in New Capitalism.” Discourse and Society 13 (2): 163–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013002404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2017a. Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2017b. “Critical Theory of Technology and STS.” Thesis Eleven 138 (1): 3–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513616689388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrando, F. 2013a. “From the Eternal Recurrence to the Posthuman Multiverse.” The Agonist 4 (1–2): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrando, F. 2013b. “Posthumanism, Transhumanism, Antihumanism, Metahumanism, and New Materialisms: Differences and Relations.” Existenz: An International Journal in Philosophy, Religion, Politics, and the Arts 8 (2): 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrando, F. 2016. “The Party of the Anthropocene: Post-Humanism, Environmentalism and the Post-Anthropocentric Paradigm Shift.” Relations 4 (2): 159–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.7358/rela-2016-002-ferr.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrando, F. 2020. “Leveling the Posthuman Playing Field.” Theology and Science 18 (1): 1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2019.1710343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fineman, M., and A. Grear, eds. 2013. Vulnerability: Reflections on a New Ethical Foundation for Law and Politics. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R. 2012 [2007]. The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. Translated by J. Flynn. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R. 2013 [2011]. Justification and Critique: Towards a Critical Theory of Politics. Translated by C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2002 [1966/1970]. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 2002. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. London: Profile.
   Google Scholar
• Gadrey, J., A. Hatchuel, L. Boltanski, and È. Chiapello. 2001. “Symposium sur Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme (de Luc Boltanski et Ève Chiapello).” Sociologie du travail 43 (3): 389–421. doi:https://doi.org/10.4000/sdt.35243.
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P. 2000. Against Race: Imagining Political Culture beyond the Color Line. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffey, A. 2016. “Guattari and Transversality, Institutions, Analysis and Experimentation.” Radical Philosophy 195: 38–47.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. 2011. Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics, and Art. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grusin, R. A., ed. 2017. Anthropocene Feminism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guattari, F. 2000 [1989]. The Three Ecologies. Translated by I. Pindar and P. Sutton. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guattari, F. 2015. “Transdisciplinarity Must Become Transversality.” Theory, Culture & Society 32 (5–6): 131–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415597045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guattari, F. 2015 [1972]. Psychoanalysis and Transversality: Texts and Interviews 1955–1971. Translated by A. Hodges and R. Sheed. Introduction by G. Deleuze. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1987 [1965/1968]. “Knowledge and Human Interests: A General Perspective.” In Knowledge and Human Interests, J. Habermas, 301–317. Translated by J. J. Shapiro. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1987 [1985]. “The Entry into Postmodernity: Nietzsche as a Turning Point.” In The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, J. Habermas, 83–105. Translated by F. Lawrence. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2003 [2001]. The Future of Human Nature. Translated by H. Beister, M. Pensky, and W. Rehg. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Halberstam, J., and I. Livingston, eds. 1995. Posthuman Bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hann, C. 2017. “The Anthropocene and Anthropology: Micro and Macro Perspectives.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 183–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016649362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, F., W. F. Haug, and W. Küttler. 2004. “Idealtypus.” In Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus (Band 6/I), edited by W. F. Haug, 622–632. Hamburg: Argument-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hauskeller, M. 2014. Sex and the Posthuman Condition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, K. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 1949 [1946]. Über den Humanismus. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.
   Google Scholar
• Herbrechter, S. 2013 [2009]. Posthumanism. A Critical Analysis. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. 2010. Crack Capitalism. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., and S. Susen. 2013. “Change the World by Cracking Capitalism? A Critical Encounter between John Holloway and Simon Susen.” Sociological Analysis 7 (1): 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A., and H. Joas. 1988 [1980]. Social Action and Human Nature. Translated by R. Meyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, K. 2020. “Responding as Composing: Towards a Post-Anthropocentric, Feminist Ethics for the Anthropocene.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 21 (2): 125–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2019.1618360.
   Google Scholar
• Hornborg, A. 2016. “Artifacts Have Consequences, Not Agency: Toward a Critical Theory of Global Environmental History.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 95–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016640536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Käll, J. 2019. “A Posthuman Data Subject? The Right to Be Forgotten and Beyond.” German Law Journal 18 (5): 1145–1162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200022288.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1995 [1781]. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Herausgegeben von Wilhelm Weischedel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1995 [1788]. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Herausgegeben von Wilhelm Weischedel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1995 [1790]. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Herausgegeben von Wilhelm Weischedel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 2003 [1785]. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Edited by T. E. Hill Jr. and A. Zweig. Translated by A. Zweig. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 2009 [1784]. An Answer to the Question: ‘What Is Enlightenment?’. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Kirksey, E. 2019. “Queer Love, Gender Bending Bacteria, and Life after the Anthropocene.” Theory, Culture & Society 36 (6): 197–219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418769995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirksey, S. E., and S. Helmreich. 2010. “The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography.” Cultural Anthropology 25 (4): 545–576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, L., G. Orzes, and F. Jia. 2019. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0): Technologies Disruption on Operations and Supply Chain Management.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 39 (6/7/8): 817–828. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2019-788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolbert, E. 2014. The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kopnina, H., H. Washington, B. Taylor, and J. J. Piccolo. 2018. “Anthropocentrism: More than Just a Misunderstood Problem.” Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 31 (1): 109–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9711-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroker, A. 2014. Exits to the Posthuman Future. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Last, A. 2015. “We are the World? Anthropocene Cultural Production between Geopoetics and Geopolitics.” Theory, Culture & Society 34 (2–3): 147–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415598626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert-Rasmussen, K., M. Rosendahl Thomsen, and J. Wamberg, eds. 2012. The Posthuman Condition: Ethics, Aesthetics and Politics of Biotechnological Challenges. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loick, D. 2018. “If You’re a Critical Theorist, How Come You Work for a University?” Critical Horizons 19 (3): 233–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2018.1485249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, T. W. 2017. “Reconstructing Social Theory and the Anthropocene.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 80–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016647971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykke, N. 2011. “This Discipline Which Is Not One: Feminist Studies as a Postdiscipline.” In Theories and Methodologies in Postgraduate Feminist Research: Researching Differently, edited by R. Buikema, G. Griffin, and N. Lykke, 137–151. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, C., W. Rogers, and S. Dodds, eds. 2014. Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon, P. 2017. Posthumanism. A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Marchesini, R. 2018. Beyond Anthropocentrism: Thoughts for a Post-Human Philosophy. Sesto San Giovanni: Mimesis.
   Google Scholar
• Margulis, L., and D. Sagan. 2000. What Is Life? Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 2000/1977 [1844]. “Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts.” In Karl Marx: Selected Writings, edited by D. McLellan, 83–121. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. 2000/1977 [1846]. “The German Ideology.” In Karl Marx: Selected Writings, edited by D. McLellan, 175–208. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 1998. “Requiem for Our Prospective Dead! (Toward a Participatory Critique of Capitalist Power).” In Deleuze and Guattari: New Mappings in Politics, Philosophy, and Culture, edited by E. Kaufman and K. J. Heller, 40–64. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLennan, M. R. 2019. Philosophy and Vulnerability: Catherine Breillat, Joan Didion, and Audre Lorde. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Misztal, B. A. 2011. The Challenges of Vulnerability: In Search of Strategies for a Less Vulnerable Social Life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, L. 2013. Human Rights and Social Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, K. 2015. The Political Sociology of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nayar, P. K. 2014. Posthumanism. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. W. 1992 [1887]. Zur Genealogie der Moral. Eine Streitschrift. Mit einem Nachwort, einer Zeittafel zu Nietzsche, Anmerkungen und bibliographischen Hinweisen von Peter Pütz. 3. Auflage. München: Goldmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. W. 1999 [1886]. Jenseits von Gut und Böse: Vorspiel einer Philosophie der Zukunft. Neuauflage. München: Goldmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nordblad, J. 2016. “Time for Politics: How a Conceptual History of Forests Can Help Us Politicize the Long Term.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 164–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016653241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, D. 2010. “Insurgent Posthumanism.” Ephemera 10 (2): 134–151.
   Google Scholar
• Pepperell, R. 2003 [1995]. The Posthuman Condition: Consciousness beyond the Brain. Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. 2018. Monkey Trouble. The Scandal of Posthumanism. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. 2002. The Blank Slate. The Modern Denial of Human Nature. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. 2003. Anthropos Today: Reflections on Modern Equipment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, T., and P. Singer, eds. 1989 [1976]. Animal Rights and Human Obligations. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Roden, D. 2015. Posthuman Life: Philosophy at the Edge of the Human. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. 2019 [2016]. Resonance: A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. Translated by J. C. Wagner. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 2007. Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. M. 2016. “The Conceptual Articulation of the Reality of Life: Max Weber’s Theoretical Constitution of Sociological Ideal Types.” Journal of Classical Sociology 16 (1): 84–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X15574414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saar, M. 2007. Genealogie als Kritik. Geschichte und Theorie des Subjekts nach Nietzsche und Foucault. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. W. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. W. 2004. Humanism and Democratic Criticism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. 2018. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution: How the EU Can Lead It.” European View 17 (1): 5–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685818762890.
   Google Scholar
• Scheler, M. 2009 [1928]. The Human Place in the Cosmos. Translated by M. S. Frings. Introduction by E. Kelly. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. 2015. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means and How to Respond.” Foreign Affairs, 12 December.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. 2017 [2016]. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. London: Portfolio Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Scranton, R. 2015. Learning to Die in the Anthropocene: Reflections on the End of a Civilization. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. 2015 [1975]. Animal Liberation. New ed. London: Bodley Head.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, P. 2009. “Rules for the Human Zoo: A Response to the Letter on Humanism.” Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 27 (1): 12–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/dst3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soper, K. 1986. Humanism and Anti-Humanism. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 1999. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 2003. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanghellini, G., and R. Rosfort. 2013. Emotions and Personhood: Exploring Fragility – Making Sense of Vulnerability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stimpson, C. R. 2016. “The Nomadic Humanities.” Los Angeles Review of Books, 12 July.
   Google Scholar
• Stirner, M. 1968 [1844]. Der Einzige und sein Eigentum und andere Schriften. Ausgewählt und mit einem Nachwort hrsg. von Hans G. Helms. München: C. Hanser.
   Google Scholar
• Strydom, P. 2017. “The Sociocultural Self-Creation of a Natural Category: Social-Theoretical Reflections on Human Agency under the Temporal Conditions of the Anthropocene.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 61–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016643330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker, S., and A. Z. Aizura, eds. 2013. The Transgender Studies Reader 2. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, S., and S. Whittle, eds. 2006. The Transgender Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2007. The Foundations of the Social: Between Critical Theory and Reflexive Sociology. Oxford: Bardwell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2008a. “Poder y anti-poder (I-III).” Erasmus: Revista para el diálogo intercultural 10 (1): 49–90.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2008b. “Poder y anti-poder (IV-V).” Erasmus: Revista para el diálogo intercultural 10 (2): 133–180.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2010a. “Los movimientos sociales en las sociedades complejas.” In Ciudadanía territorial y movimientos sociales. Historia y nuevas problemáticas en el escenario latinoamericano y mundial, edited by C. Basconzuelo, T. Morel, and S. Susen, 149–226. Río Cuarto: Ediciones del ICALA.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2010b. “The Transformation of Citizenship in Complex Societies.” Journal of Classical Sociology 10 (3): 259–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X10371716.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2010c. “Meadian Reflections on the Existential Ambivalence of Human Selfhood.” Studies in Social and Political Thought 17: 62–81.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2011a. “Bourdieu and Adorno on the Transformation of Culture in Modern Society: Towards a Critical Theory of Cultural Production.” In The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, edited by S. Susen and B. S. Turner, 173–202. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2011b. “Afterword: Concluding Reflections on the Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu.” In The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, edited by S. Susen and B. S. Turner, 367–409. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S., and B. S. Turner. 2011b. “Introduction: Preliminary Reflections on the Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu.” In The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, edited by S. Susen and B. S. Turner, xiii–xxix. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2012. “Une sociologie pragmatique de la critique est-elle possible? Quelques réflexions sur De la critique de Luc Boltanski.” Revue philosophique de Louvain 110 (4): 685–728.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2013a. “Bourdieusian Reflections on Language: Unavoidable Conditions of the Real Speech Situation.” Social Epistemology 27 (3–4): 199–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.818733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2013b. “A Reply to My Critics: The Critical Spirit of Bourdieusian Language.” Social Epistemology 27 (3–4): 323–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.824646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2014 [2012]. “Is There Such a Thing as a ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’? Reflections on Luc Boltanski’s on Critique.” In The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’, edited by S. Susen and B. S. Turner, 173–210. Translated by S. Susen. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2014 [2015]. “Towards a Dialogue between Pierre Bourdieu’s ‘Critical Sociology’ and Luc Boltanski’s ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’.” In The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’, edited by S. Susen and B. S. Turner, 313–348. Translated by S. Susen. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2014a. “15 Theses on Power.” Philosophy and Society 25 (3): 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2014b. “Luc Boltanski and His Critics: An Afterword.” In The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’, edited by S. Susen and B. S. Turner, 613–801. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2015a. The ‘Postmodern Turn’ in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2015b. “Emancipation.” In The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, edited by M. T. Gibbons, D. Coole, E. Ellis, and K. Ferguson, 1024–1038. Vol. 3. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2016a. Pierre Bourdieu et la distinction sociale. Un essai philosophique. Oxford: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2016b. “Towards a Critical Sociology of Dominant Ideologies: An Unexpected Reunion between Pierre Bourdieu and Luc Boltanski.” Cultural Sociology 10 (2): 195–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975515593098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2016c. “Scattered Remarks on the Concept of Engagement: A Socio-Philosophical Approach.” Philosophy and Society 27 (2): 459–463.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2016d. “Reconstructing the Self: A Goffmanian Perspective.” In Reconstructing Social Theory, History and Practice, Book Series: Current Perspectives in Social Theory, edited by H. F. Dahms and E. R. Lybeck, 111–143. Vol. 35. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2018a. “The Economy of Enrichment: Towards a New Form of Capitalism?” Berlin Journal of Critical Theory 2 (2): 5–98.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2018b. “The Seductive Force of ‘Noumenal Power’: A New Path (Or Impasse) for Critical Theory?” Journal of Political Power 11 (1): 4–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2017.1362734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2020a. Sociology in the Twenty-First Century: Key Trends, Debates, and Challenges. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2020b. “Intimations of Humanity and the Case for a Philosophical Sociology.” Journal of Political Power 13 (1): 123–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2019.1701822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2020c. “The Resonance of Resonance: Critical Theory as a Sociology of World-Relations?” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 33 (3): 309–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-019-9313-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susen, S. 2020d. “No Escape from the Technosystem?” Philosophy & Social Criticism 46 (6): 734–782. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719866239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susen, S., and B. S. Turner, eds. 2011a. The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. 2018. “How to Use Max Weber’s Ideal Type in Sociological Analysis.” Journal of Classical Sociology 18 (3): 181–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X17743643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szerszynski, B. 2017a. “The Anthropocene Monument: On Relating Geological and Human Time.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 111–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016666087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szerszynski, B. 2017b. “Gods of the Anthropocene: Geo-Spiritual Formations in the Earth’s New Epoch.” Theory, Culture & Society 34 (2–3): 253–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417691102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallis, R. 1997. Enemies of Hope: A Critique of Contemporary Pessimism. Irrationalism, Anti-Humanism and Counter-Enlightenment. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, M. R. 2013. The New Human in Literature: Posthuman Visions of Changes in Body, Mind and Society after 1900. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. S. 1993. “Outline of a Theory of Human Rights.” Sociology 27 (3): 489–512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038593027003009.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. S. 2006. Vulnerability and Human Rights. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. S. 2007. “Justification, the City and Late Capitalism: An Extended Review of The New Spirit of Capitalism.” The Sociological Review 55 (2): 410–415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00712_1.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. S. 2016. “Ritual, Belief and Habituation: Religion and Religions from the Axial Age to the Anthropocene.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 132–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016645355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viveiros de Castro, E. 2014 [2009]. Cannibal Metaphysics: For a Post-Structural Anthropology. Translated and edited by P. Skafish. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal.
   Google Scholar
• Wamberg, J., and M. R. Thomsen. 2016. “The Posthuman in the Anthropocene: A Look through the Aesthetic Field.” European Review 25 (1): 150–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798716000405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A., and O. H. Huntington. 2008. “They’re Here—I Can Feel Them: The Epistemic Spaces of Indigenous and Western Knowledges.” Social & Cultural Geography 9 (3): 257–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360801990488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, J. 2020. “Dispossessing Academics: The Shift to ‘Appropriation’ in the Governing of Academic Life.” European Journal of Social Theory 23 (3): 350–369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431019854998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennemann, D. J. 2013. Posthuman Personhood. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, K. P. 2017. “Indigenous Climate Change Studies: Indigenizing Futures, Decolonizing the Anthropocene.” English Language Notes 55 (1–2): 153–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/00138282-55.1-2.153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. 2004 [1978]. On Human Nature. 25th Anniversary ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. 2010. What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, M., J. M. David, and S. Hi Kim. 2018. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities and Challenges.” International Journal of Financial Research 9 (2): 90–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v9n2p90.
   Google Scholar
• Yack, B. 1986. The Longing for Total Revolution: Philosophic Sources of Social Discontent from Rousseau to Marx and Nietzsche. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar, T., M. Foth, and M. Kamruzzaman. 2019. “Towards Post-Anthropocentric Cities: Reconceptualizing Smart Cities to Evade Urban Ecocide.” Journal of Urban Technology 26 (2): 147–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2018.1524249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar