Who is a Conspiracy Theorist?

References

• Barkun, M. 2013. Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. University of California Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt3fh35v
   Google Scholar
• Bortolotti, L. 2020. The Epistemic Innocence of Irrational Beliefs. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863984.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Brotherton, R. 2015. Suspicious Minds: Why. Bloomsbury, UK: Bloomsbury Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Brun, G. 2017. “Conceptual Re-Engineering: From Explication to Reflective Equilibrium.” Synthese 197 (3): 925–954. doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1596-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnap, R. 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassam, Q. 2019. Conspiracy Theories. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, D. 2003. “Conspiracy Theories and Official Stories.” The International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2): 197–209. doi:10.5840/ijap200317210.
   Google Scholar
• Cordes, M., and G. Siegwart. “Explication.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed 12 November 2021. https://iep.utm.edu/explicat/.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2016. “When Inferring to a Conspiracy Might Be the Best Explanation.” Social Epistemology 30 (5–6): 572–591. doi:10.1080/02691728.2016.1172362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2018. “The Problem of Conspiracism.” Argumenta 3 (2): 327–343.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2021. “Debunking Conspiracy Theories.” Synthese 198 (10): 9897–9911. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02694-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duetz, J. Forthcoming. “What Does It Mean for a Conspiracy Theory to Be a ‘Theory’?” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L., H. W. Riecken, and S. Schachter. 1956. When Prophecy Fails: A Social and Psychological Study of a Modern Group That Predicted the Destruction of the World. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 1999. “What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences.” Polity 31 (3): 57–393. doi:10.2307/3235246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, K. 2018. “Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style: Do Conspiracy Theories Posit Implausibly Vast and Evil Conspiracies?” Social Epistemology 32 (1): 24–40. doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1352625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harambam, J., and S. Aupers. 2017. “‘I Am Not a Conspiracy Theorist’: Relational Identifications in the Dutch Conspiracy Milieu.” Cultural Sociology 11 (1): 113–129. doi:10.1177/1749975516661959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichino, A., and J. Räikkä. 2020. “Non-Doxastic Conspiracy Theories.” Argumenta. doi:10.14275/2465-2334/20200.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. L. 2007. “God as the Ultimate Conspiracy Theorist.” Episteme 4 (2): 135–149. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.135.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. L. Forthcoming. “Conspiracy Theory and (Or As) Folk Psychology.” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klintman, M. 2019. Knowledge Resistance: How We Avoid Insight from Others. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, S. 2019. “Carnapian Explications, Experimental Philosophy, and Fruitful Concepts.” Inquiry 62 (6): 700–717. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2019.1567381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., and D. M. Webster. 1996. “Motivated Closing of the Mind: ‘Seizing’ and ‘Freezing’.” Psychological Review 103: 263–283. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchlewska, M., A. Cichocka, and M. Kossowska. 2017. “Addicted to Answers: Need for Cognitive Closure and the Endorsement of Conspiracy Beliefs.” European Journal of Social Psychology 48 (2): 109–117. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. 2021a. “Conspiracy Theory”. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracy%20theories.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. 2021b. “Conspiracy Theorist”. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracy%20theorist.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, E. J. 2021. Kunskapsteori En Historisk och Systematisk Introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, N. Forthcoming. “Towards a Conceptual Framework for Conspiracy Theory Theories.” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. 1995. “Popper Revisited, or What is Wrong with Conspiracy Theories?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1177/004839319502500101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. 2006. “‘Complots of Mischief.” In Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate, edited by C. Coady, 139–166. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. 2016. “Are Conspiracy Theorists Epistemically Vicious?” In A Companion to Applied Philosophy, edited by K. Lippert-Rasmussen, K. Brownlee, and D. Coady, Chapter 9. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. Forthcoming. “‘Conspiracy Theory’ as a Tonkish Term - the Runabout Inference-Ticket from Truth to Falsehood.” Social Epistemology.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. 1972. The Concept of Representation. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, S. A. 2021. “Conspiracy Theory.” Encyclopedia Britannica, January 27. https://www.britannica.com/topic/conspiracy-theory.
   Google Scholar
• Sartwell, C. 1991. “Knowledge is Merely True Belief.” American Philosophical Quarterly 28 (2): 157–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, M. Forthcoming. “Conceptual Engineering, Conceptual Domination, and the Case of Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., T. Chamorro-Premuzic, and A. Furnham. 2010. “Unanswered Questions: A Preliminary Investigation of Personality and Individual Difference Predictors of 9/11 Conspiracy Beliefs.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 24 (6): 749–761. doi:10.1002/acp.1583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. 1970. “Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination.” Scientific American 223 (5): 96–102. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1170-96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. 1974. “Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour.” Social Science Information 13 (2): 65–93. doi:10.1177/053901847401300204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., M. G. Billig, R. P. Bundy, and C. Flament. 1971. “Social Categorization and Intergroup Behavior.” European Journal of Social Psychology 1 (2): 149–178. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J, E. 2020. Conspiracy Theories, a Primer. The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J. W. 2017. “Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 31 (1): 50–58. doi:10.1002/acp.3301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J. W. 2018. The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J. W., and K. Douglas. 2018. “Connecting the Dots: Illusory Pattern Perception Predicts Belief in Conspiracies and the Supernatural.” European Journal of Social Psychology 48 (3): 320–335. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar