Conceptual Engineering, Conceptual Domination, and the Case of Conspiracy Theories

References

• Anderson, Elizabeth. 2011. “Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony.” Episteme 8 (2): 144–164. doi:10.3366/epi.2011.0013.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Derek. 2020. “Metasemantic Ethics.” Ratio 33 (4): 206–219. doi:10.1111/rati.12256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basham, Lee. 2018. “Social Scientists and Pathologizing Conspiracy Theorizing.” In Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously, edited by M R. X. Dentith, 95–107. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Jo, and Shane Scott. 2012. ”Secret 'Kill List' Proves a Test of Obama's Principles and Will.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger, Renée Jorgensen. 2017. “The Pragmatics of Slurs.” Noûs 51 (3): 439–462. doi:10.1111/nous.12090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, Tyler. 1979. “Individualism and the Mental.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4 (1): 73–122. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1979.tb00374.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman. 2018. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman. Forthcoming. “Better Than ‘Democracy’: An Essay on Linguistic Abandonment.”
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman, and Ernie Lepore. 2005. Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cassam, Quassim. 2019. Conspiracy Theories. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 2004. “On Historical Amnesia, Foreign Policy, and Iraq.” Chomsky.info. https://chomsky.info/20040217/.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam, and Edward S. Herman. 1979a. The Political Economy of Human Rights, Volume I: The Washington Connection and Third World Fascism. Boston: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam, and Edward S. Herman. 1979b. The Political Economy of Human Rights, Volume II: After the Cataclysm: Postwar Indochina and the Reconstruction of Imperial Ideology. Boston: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, David. 2018a. “Anti-Rumor Campaigns and Conspiracy-Baiting as Propaganda.” In Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously, 171–187. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, David. 2018b. “Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule on Conspiracy Theories.” Argumenta, edited by M R. X. Dentith, 3 (2): 291–302. doi:10.23811/56.arg2017.coa.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Neta C., and Catherine Lutz. 2019. “Human Cost of Post-9/11 Wars.” Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs at Brown University: Costs of War Project. https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/files/cow/imce/papers/2019/Direct%20War%20Deaths%20COW%20Estimate%20November%2013%202019%20FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dembroff, Robin. 2020. “Beyond Binary: Genderqueer as Critical Gender Kind.” Philosophers’ Imprint 20 (9): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. Forthcoming. “Some Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X., and Lee Basham. 2018. “The Psychologists’ Conspiracy Panic: They Seek to Cure Everyone.” In Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously, edited by M R. X. Dentith, 79–93. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Karen M., Joseph E. Uscinski, Robbie M. Sutton, Aleksandra Cichocka, Turkay Nefes, Chee Siang Ang, and Farzin Deravi. 2019. “Understanding Conspiracy Theories.” Political Psychology 40 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1111/pops.12568.
   Google Scholar
• Duetz, J. Forthcoming. “What Does It Mean for a Conspiracy Theory to be a ‘Theory’?” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertzel, Ted. 2019. The Conspiracy Theory Pyramid Scheme, 226–242. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, Sally. 2012. Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky. 1988. Manufacturing Consent: Political Economy of the Mass Media. London: The Bodley Head Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Husting, Ginna, and Martin Orr. 2007. “Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion.” Symbolic Interaction 30 (2): 127–150. doi:10.1525/si.2007.30.2.127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaszczolt, Kasia M. 2016. Meaning in Linguistic Interaction: Semantics, Metasemantics, and Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, Brian. Forthcoming. “Conspiracy Theory and (or as) Folk Psychology.” Social Epistemology.
   Google Scholar
• Klaehn, Jeffery. 2002. “A Critical Review and Assessment of Herman and Chomsky’s ‘Propaganda Model.’” European Journal of Communication 17 (2): 147–182. doi:10.1177/0267323102017002691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukla, Rebecca. 2018. “Slurs, Interpellation, and Ideology.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 56 (S1): 7–32. doi:10.1111/sjp.12298.
   Google Scholar
• Luban, David. “What Went Wrong: Torture and the Office of Legal Counsel in the Bush Administration.” U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, 2009. https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cong/42/.
   Google Scholar
• Lynne, Tirrell. 2012. ”Genocidal Language Games.” In Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech, edited by Ishani Maitra and Mary Kate McGowan, 174–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, Teresa. 2020. “Amelioration vs Perversion.” In Shifting Concepts: The Philosophy and Psychology of Conceptual Variability, edited by Teresa Marques and Åsa Wikforss, 260–284. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, Andrew, and Jeffery Klaehn. 2010. “The Herman–Chomsky Propaganda Model: A Critical Approach to Analysing Mass Media Behaviour.” Sociology Compass 4 (4): 215–229. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00275.x.
   Google Scholar
• Napolitano, M. Giulia, and Kevin Reuter. 2021. “What Is a Conspiracy Theory?” Erkenntnis 1–28. doi:10.1007/s10670-021-00441-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, Martin, and Ginna Husting. 2019. “Media Marginalization of Racial Minorities: ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ in U.S. Ghettos and on the ‘Arab Street.” In Conspiracy Theories & the People Who Believe Them, edited by Joseph E. Uscinski, 82–93. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pigden, Charles R. 2007. “Conspiracy Theories and the Conventional Wisdom.” Episteme 4 (2): 219–232. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.219.
   Google Scholar
• Pigden, Charles R. Forthcoming. “Conspiracy Theory’ as a Tonkish Term – The Runabout Inference-Ticket from Truth to Falsehood.” Social Epistemology, edited by Daniel Foagl, Daniel W. Harris, and Matt Moss.
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett, David, and Tim Sundell. 2013. “Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.” Philosophers’ Imprint 13 (23): 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podosky, Paul-Mikhail Catapang. 2022. “Agency, Power, and Injustice in Metalinguistic Disagreement.” The Philosophical Quarterly 72 (2): 441–464. doi:10.1093/pq/pqab023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary. 1986. Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Queloz, Matthieu, and Friedemann Bieber. 2021. “Conceptual Engineering and the Politics of Implementation.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103 (3): 670–691. doi:10.1111/papq.12394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recanati, François. 2010. Truth-Conditional Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saul, Jennifer. 2018. “Dogwhistles, Political Manipulation, and Philosophy of Language.” In New Work on Speech Acts, 360–383. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, Sarah. 2018. “The Importance of Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118 (2): 127–147. doi:10.1093/arisoc/aoy008.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, Matthew. 2020. “Philosophical Speech Acts.” Philosophy 95 (4): 497–521. doi:10.1017/S0031819120000194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, Matthew. 2021a. “Conceptual Domination.” Synthese 199 (5–6): 15043–15067. doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03454-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, Matthew. 2021b. “On Stipulation.” European Journal of Philosophy 29 (4): 1100–1114. doi:10.1111/ejop.12627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, Matthew. 2022. “Rethinking Conspiracy Theories.” Synthese 200 (331): 1–29. doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03811-x.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, Matthew. Forthcoming. “Truth from the Agent Point of View.” Philosophical Quarterly.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoker, Sarah. 2021. Military-Age Males in Counterinsurgency and Drone Warfare. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, Jason. 2015. How Propaganda Works. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass. 2016. Conspiracy Theories and Other Dangerous Ideas. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass. 2020. “The Delicate Art of Debunking Conspiracy Theories.” Bloomberg Opinion. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-02-10/conspiracy-theories-can-be-debunked.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R., and Adrian Vermeule. 2009. “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2): 202–227. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirrell, Lynne. 2012. “Genocidal Language Games.” In Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech, edited by Ishani Maitra and Mary Kate McGowan, 174–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, Charles. 2008. Occassion-Sensitivity: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsapos, M. Forthcoming. “Who is a Conspiracy Theorist?” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar