What Does It Mean for a Conspiracy Theory to Be a ‘Theory’?

References

• Basham, L. 2003. “Malevolent Global Conspiracy.” Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1): 91–103. doi:10.1111/1467-9833.00167.
   Google Scholar
• Bost, P. R., S. G. Prunier, and A. J. Piper. 2010. “Relations of Familiarity with Reasoning Strategies in Conspiracy Beliefs.” Psychological Reports 107 (2): 593–602. doi:10.2466/07.09.17.PR0.107.5.593-602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassam, Q. 2019. Conspiracy Theories. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. 2002. “Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorizing.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2): 131–150. doi:10.1177/004931032002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coady, D. 2012. What to Believe Now: Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• de Ridder, J. 2021. “Deep Disagreements and Political Polarization.” In Political Epistemology, edited by E. Edenberg and M. Hannon, 226–243. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780192893338.003.0013.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2014. The Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2016. “When Inferring to a Conspiracy Might Be the Best Explanation.” Social Epistemology 30 (5–6): 572–591. doi:10.1080/02691728.2016.1172362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. forthcoming. “Some Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X., and B. L. Keeley. 2018. “The Applied Epistemology of Conspiracy Theories: An Overview.” In The Routledge Handbook of Applied Epistemology, edited by D. Coady and J. Chase, 84–294. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X., and M. Orr. 2017. “Secrecy and Conspiracy.” Episteme 15 (4): 433–450. doi:10.1017/epi.2017.9.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., and R. M. Sutton. 2018. “Why Conspiracy Theories Matter: A Social Psychological Analysis.” European Review of Social Psychology 29 (1): 256–298. doi:10.1080/10463283.2018.1537428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duetz, J. C. M. 2022. “Conspiracy Theories are Not Beliefs.” Erkenntnis. doi:10.1007/s10670-022-00620-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duetz, J. C. M., and M R. X. Dentith. 2022. “Reconciling Conceptual Confusions in the Le Monde Debate on Conspiracy Theories, J. C. M. Duetz and M R. X. Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (10): 40–50. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7il.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. 2018. “What’s Epistemically Wrong with Conspiracy Theorising?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84: 235–257. doi:10.1017/S1358246118000619.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, P. 1994. Belief-Policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511520013.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, R. 1965. The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. Cambridge, NY: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., and P. K. Lamberty. 2017. “Too Special to Be Duped: Need for Uniqueness Motivates Conspiracy Beliefs.” European Journal of Social Psychology 47 (6): 724–734. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., K. M. Douglas, and R. M. Sutton. 2018. “Blaming a Few Bad Apples to Save a Threatened Barrel: The System-Justifying Function of Conspiracy Theories: System-Justifying Function of Conspiracy Theories.” Political Psychology 39 (2): 465–478. doi:10.1111/pops.12404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. L. 1999. “Of Conspiracy Theories.” The Journal of Philosophy 96 (3): 109–126. doi:10.2307/2564659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, P. 2003. “Making Sense of Conspiracy Theories.” In Conspiracy Theories in American History: An Encyclopedia, edited by P. Knight, 15–25. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, N. 2007. “Radically Socialized Knowledge and Conspiracy Theories.” Episteme 4 (2): 181–192. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.181.
   Google Scholar
• Mandik, P. 2007. “Shit Happens.” Episteme 4 (2): 205–218. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.205.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M., K. L. Saunders, and C. E. Farhart. 2016. “Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 824–844. doi:10.1111/ajps.12234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittendorf, W. forthcoming. “Conspiracy Theories and Democratic Legitimacy.” Social Epistemology.
   Google Scholar
• Napolitano, M. G. 2021. “Conspiracy Theories and Evidential Self-Insulation.” In The Epistemology of Fake News, edited by S. Bernecker, A. Flowerree, and T. Grundmann, 82–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nattrass, N. 2012. “How Bad Ideas Gain Social Traction.” The Lancet 380 (9839): 332–333. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61238-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. 1995. “Popper Revisited, or What is Wrong with Conspiracy Theories?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1177/004839319502500101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. R. 2007. “Conspiracy Theories and the Conventional Wisdom.” Episteme 4 (2): 219–232. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.219.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Räikkä, J. 2009. “On Political Conspiracy Theories.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2): 185–201. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00300.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räikkä, J. 2018. “Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories: An Introduction.” Argumenta 3 (2): 205–216. doi:10.23811/51.arg2017.rai.
   Google Scholar
• Ranalli, C. 2021. “What is Deep Disagreement?” Topoi 40 (5): 983–998. doi:10.1007/s11245-018-9600-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, M. forthcoming. “Conceptual Engineering, Conceptual Domination, and the Case of Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., and A. Vermeule. 2009. “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2): 202–227. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., T. Chamorro-Premuzic, and A. Furnham. 2010. “Unanswered Questions: A Preliminary Investigation of Personality and Individual Difference Predictors of 9/11 Conspiracist Beliefs.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 24 (6): 749–761. doi:10.1002/acp.1583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., J. Pietschnig, U. S. Tran, I. W. Nader, S. Stieger, and M. Voracek. 2013. “Lunar Lies: The Impact of Informational Framing and Individual Differences in Shaping Conspiracist Beliefs About the Moon Landings: Conspiracy Theories.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 27 (1): 71–80. doi:10.1002/acp.2873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsapos, M. forthcoming. “Who is a Conspiracy Theorist?” Social Epistemology.
   Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E. 2018. “Down the Rabbit Hole We Go!” In Conspiracy Theories & the People Who Believe Them, edited by J.E. Uscinski, 1–32. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J. -W. 2020. “An Existential Threat Model of Conspiracy Theories.” European Psychologist 25 (1): 16–25. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J. -W. 2022. “Psychological Benefits of Believing Conspiracy Theories.” Current Opinion in Psychology 47: 101352. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. J. 2016. “Some Dare Call It Conspiracy: Labeling Something a Conspiracy Theory Does Not Reduce Belief in It.” Political Psychology 37 (5): 695–705. doi:10.1111/pops.12285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar