Towards a Conceptual Framework for Conspiracy Theory Theories

References

• Barkun, M. 2013. A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Béziau, J.-Y. 2012. “The Power of the Hexagon.” Logica Universalis 6 (1): 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Béziau, J.-Y., and S. Read. 2014. “Editorial: Square of Opposition: A Diagram and a Theory in Historical Perspective.” History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (4): 315–316. doi:10.1080/01445340.2014.917836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanché, R. 1952. “Quantity, Modality, and Other Kindred Systems of Categories.” Mind 61: 369–375. doi:10.1093/mind/LXI.243.369.
   Google Scholar
• Buenting, J., and J. Taylor. 2010. “Conspiracy Theories and Fortuitous Data.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4): 567–578. doi:10.1177/0048393109350750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butter, M., and P. Knight, eds. 2020. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cassam, Q. 2016. “Vice Epistemology.” The Monist 99 (2): 159–180. doi:10.1093/monist/onv034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassam, Q. 2019. Conspiracy Theories. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chater, N., and M. Oaksford. 1999. “The Probability Heuristics Model of Syllogistic Reasoning.” Cognitive Psychology 38 (2): 191–258. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coady, D., ed. 2006. Conspiracy Theories. The Philosophical Debate. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Coletti, G., and R. Scozzafava. 2002. Probabilistic Logic in a Coherent Setting. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. Forthcoming a. “The Future of the Philosophy of Conspiracy Theory: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Conspiracy Theory Theory.” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. Forthcoming b. “Some Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2014. The Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X., ed. 2018. Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2019. “Conspiracy Theories and Philosophy: Bringing the Epistemology of a Freighted Term into the Social Sciences.” In Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, edited by J. E. Uscinski, 94–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., J. E. Uscinski, R. M. Sutton, A. Cichocka, T. Nefes, C. S. Ang, and F. Deravi. 2019. “Understanding Conspiracy Theories.” Political Psychology 40 (S1): 3–35. doi:10.1111/pops.12568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, D., and H. Prade. 2012. “From Blanché’s Hexagonal Organization of Concepts to Formal Concept Analysis and Possibility Theory.” Logica Universalis 6 (1–2): 149–169. doi:10.1007/s11787-011-0039-0.
   Google Scholar
• Gilio, A., N. Pfeifer, and G. Sanfilippo. 2016. “Transitivity in Coherence-Based Probability Logic.” Journal of Applied Logic 14: 46–64. doi:10.1016/j.jal.2015.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, D. R., and C T. Bauch. 2016. “On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs.” PLOS One 11 (1): e0147905. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, K. 2022. “Do Conspiracies Tend to Fail? Philosophical Reflections on a Poorly Supported Academic Meme.” Episteme 1–20. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/epi.2021.55.
   Google Scholar
• Hailperin, T. 1999. Sentential Probability Logic. Origins, Development, Current Status, and Technical Applications. Bethlehem: Lehigh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. 2018. “What is Epistemically Wrong with Conspiracy Theorising?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84: 235–257. doi:10.1017/S1358246118000619.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, V. F. 2006. Mainstream and Formal Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. L. 1999. “Of Conspiracy Theories.” The Journal of Philosophy 96 (3): 109–126. doi:10.2307/2564659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, P. 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Napolitano, M. G. 2021. “Conspiracy Theories and Evidential Self-Insulation.” In The Epistemology of Fake News, edited by S. Bernecker, A. K. Flowerree, and T. Grundmann, 82–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 2021. The Traditional Square of Opposition. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The Metaphysics Research Lab, Department of Philosophy, Stanford University. Fall. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/square/.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. L. 2000. Intermediate Quantities: Logic, Linguistics, and Aristotelian Semantics. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, S., and D. Westerståhl. 2006. Quantifiers in Language and Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, N. 2014. “Reasoning About Uncertain Conditionals.” Studia Logica 102 (4): 849–866. doi:10.1007/s11225-013-9505-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, N. 2021. “Probability Logic.” In Handbook of Rationality, edited by M. Knauff and W. Spohn, 277–284. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, N., and I. Douven. 2014. “Formal Epistemology and the New Paradigm Psychology of Reasoning.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (2): 199–221. doi:10.1007/s13164-013-0165-0.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, N., and G. D. Kleiter. 2005. “Coherence and Nonmonotonicity in Human Reasoning.” Synthese 146 (1–2): 93–109. doi:10.1007/s11229-005-9073-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, N., and G. D. Kleiter. 2009. “Framing Human Inference by Coherence Based Probability Logic.” Journal of Applied Logic 7 (2): 206–217. doi:10.1016/j.jal.2007.11.005.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, N., and G. D. Kleiter. 2011. “Uncertain Deductive Reasoning.” In The Science of Reason: A Festschrift for Jonathan St B.T. Evans, edited by K. Manktelow, D. E. Over, and S. Elqayam, 145–166. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, N., and G. Sanfilippo. 2017. “Probabilistic Squares and Hexagons of Opposition Under Coherence.” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 88: 282–294. doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2017.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. 1995. “Popper Revisited, or What is Wrong with Conspiracy Theories?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 5 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1177/004839319502500101.
   Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. 2017. “Are Conspiracy Theorists Epistemically Vicious?” In A Companion to Applied Philosophy, edited by K. Lippert-Rasmussen, K. Brownlee, and D. Coady, 120–132. Hoboken (New Jersey): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pipes, D. 1997. Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where It Comes From. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. 2006. “The Conspiracy Theory of Society.” In Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate, edited by D. Coady, 13–15. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sesmat, A. 1951. Logique II: Les Raisonnements, la Logistique. Paris: Hermann.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., and A. Vermeule. 2009. “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2): 202–227. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., and A. Furnham. 2014. “Political Paranoia and Conspiracy Theories.” In Power Politics, and Paranoia: Why People are Suspicious of Their Leaders, edited by J.-P. Prooijen and P. A. M. van Lange, 218–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W. 2017. “Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 31 (1): 50–58. doi:10.1002/acp.3301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar