610
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Future of the Philosophy of Conspiracy Theory: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Conspiracy Theory Theory

ORCID Icon
Pages 405-412 | Received 09 Dec 2022, Accepted 23 Jan 2023, Published online: 15 Feb 2023

References

  • Basham, L. 2001. “Living with the Conspiracy.” The Philosophical Forum XXXII (3): 265–280. doi:10.1111/0031-806X.00065.
  • Basham, L. 2003. “Malevolent Global Conspiracy.” Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1): 91–103. doi:10.1111/1467-9833.00167.
  • Basham, L. 2011. “Conspiracy Theory and Rationality.” In Beyond Rationality, edited by C. Jensen and R. Harré, 49–87. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Basham, L. 2018. “Joining the Conspiracy.” Argumenta 3 (2): 271–290. doi:10.23811/55.arg2017.bas.
  • Buenting, J., and J. Taylor. 2010. “Conspiracy Theories and Fortuitous Data.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4): 567–578. doi:10.1177/0048393109350750.
  • Clarke, S. 2002. “Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorizing.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2): 131–150. doi:10.1177/004931032002001.
  • Clarke, S. 2006. “Appealing to the Fundamental Attribution Error: Was It All a Big Mistake?” In Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate, edited by D. Coady, 132–139. Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
  • Clarke, S. 2007. “Conspiracy Theories and the Internet—controlled Demolition and Arrested Development.” Episteme 4 (2): 167–180. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.167.
  • Coady, D. 2006. “Conspiracy Theories and Official Stories.” In Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate, edited by D. Coady, 115–128. Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
  • Coady, D. 2007. “Are Conspiracy Theorists Irrational?” Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 4 (2): 193–204. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.193.
  • Dentith, M R. X. 2014. The Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dentith, M R. X. 2016. “When Inferring to a Conspiracy Might Be the Best Explanation.” Social Epistemology 30 (5–6): 572–591. doi:10.1080/02691728.2016.1172362.
  • Dentith, M R. X. 2018. “Expertise and Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology 32 (3): 196–208. doi:10.1080/02691728.2018.1440021.
  • Dentith, M R. X. 2019. “Conspiracy Theories on the Basis of the Evidence.” Synthese 196 (6): 2243–2261. doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1532-7.
  • Dentith, M R. X. 2021. “Debunking Conspiracy Theories.” Synthese 198 (10): 9897–9911. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02694-0.
  • Dentith, M R. X. Forthcoming. “Some Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology.
  • Dentith, M R. X., and B. L. Keeley. 2018. “The Applied Epistemology of Conspiracy Theories: An Overview.” In The Routledge Handbook of Applied Epistemology, edited by D. Coady and J. Chase, 284–294, London: Routledge.
  • Dentith, M R. X., and M. Orr. 2017. “Secrecy and Conspiracy.” Episteme 15 (4): 433–450. doi:10.1017/epi.2017.9.
  • Duetz, J. Forthcoming. “What Does It Mean for a Conspiracy Theory to Be a ‘Theory’?” Social Epistemology.
  • Hagen, K. 2011. “Conspiracy Theories and Stylized Facts.” The Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 21 (2): 3–22. doi:10.5840/peacejustice20112121.
  • Hagen, K. 2018. “Conspiracy Theorists and Monological Belief Systems.” Argumenta 3 (2): 303–326. doi:10.23811/57.arg2017.hag.
  • Hagen, K. 2020. “Should Academics Debunk Conspiracy Theories?” Social Epistemology 34 (5): 423–439. doi:10.1080/02691728.2020.1747118.
  • Hauswald, R. Forthcoming. “‘That’s Just a Conspiracy Theory!’: Relevant Alternatives, Dismissive Conversational Exercitives, and the Problem of Premature Conclusions.” Social Epistemology.
  • Keeley, B. L. 1999. “Of Conspiracy Theories.” The Journal of Philosophy 96 (3): 109–126. doi:10.2307/2564659.
  • Keeley, B. L. 2003. “Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition!: More Thoughts on Conspiracy Theory.” Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1): 104–110. doi:10.1111/1467-9833.00168.
  • Keeley, B. L. 2007. “God as the Ultimate Conspiracy Theory.” Episteme 4 (2): 135–149. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.135.
  • Keeley, B. L. Forthcoming. “Conspiracy Theory and (Or As) Folk Psychology.” Social Epistemology.
  • Levy, N. 2007. “Radically Socialized Knowledge and Conspiracy Theories.” Episteme 4 (2): 181–192. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.181.
  • Mittendorf, W. Forthcoming. “Conspiracy Theories and Democratic Legitimacy.” Social Epistemology.
  • Pfeifer, N. Forthcoming. “Towards a Conceptual Framework for Conspiracy Theory Theories.” Social Epistemology.
  • Pigden, C. 1995. “Popper Revisited, or What is Wrong with Conspiracy Theories?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1177/004839319502500101.
  • Pigden, C. Forthcoming. “Conspiracy Theory’ as a Tonkish Term—the Runabout Inference-Ticket from Truth to Falsehood.” Social Epistemology.
  • Popper, K. R. 1969. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Vol. 2. 5th ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Räikkä, J. 2009. “The Ethics of Conspiracy Theorising.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (4): 457–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-009-9189-1.
  • Shields, M. Forthcoming. “Conceptual Engineering, Conceptual Domination and the Case of Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology.
  • Stokes, P. 2018. “Conspiracy Theory and the Perils of Pure Particularism.” In Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously, edited by M R. X. Dentith, 25–37. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Stokes, P. Forthcoming. “The Normative Turn in Conspiracy Theory Theory?” Social Epistemology.
  • Tsapos, M. Forthcoming. “Who is a Conspiracy Theorist?” Social Epistemology.
  • Uscinski, J., A. Enders, C. Klofstad, M. Seelig, H. Drochon, K. Premaratne, M. Murthi, and S. E. Richey. 2022. “Have Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Increased Over Time?” PLoS One 17 (7): e0270429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270429.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.