Some Conspiracy Theories

References

• Ahadzadeh, A. S., F. S. Ong, and S. L. Wu. 2021. “Social Media Skepticism and Belief in Conspiracy Theories About COVID-19: The Moderating Role of the Dark Triad.” Current Psychology. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02198-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basham, L. 2001. “Living with the Conspiracy.” The Philosophical Forum XXXII (3): 265–280. doi:10.1111/0031-806X.00065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basham, L. 2006. “Afterthoughts on Conspiracy Theory: Resilience and Ubiquity.” In Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate, edited by D. Coady, 133–137. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Basham, L. 2011. “Conspiracy Theory and Rationality.” In Beyond Rationality, edited by C. Jensen and R. Harré, 49–87. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Basham, L. 2018. “Joining the Conspiracy.” Argumenta 3 (2): 271–290. doi:10.23811/55.arg2017.bas.
   Google Scholar
• Buenting, J., and J. Taylor. 2010. “Conspiracy Theories and Fortuitous Data.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4): 567–578. doi:10.1177/0048393109350750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassam, Q. 2015. “Bad Thinkers: Why Do Some People Believe Conspiracy Theories? It’s Not Just Who or What They Know. It’s a Matter of Intellectual Character.” Aeon. https://aeon.co/essays/the-intellectual-character-of-conspiracy-theorists.
   Google Scholar
• Cassam, Q. 2016. “Vice Epistemology.” The Monist 99: 159–180. doi:10.1093/monist/onv034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassam, Q. 2019. Conspiracy Theories. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cíbik, M., and P. Hardoš. 2020. “Conspiracy Theories and Reasonable Pluralism.” European Journal of Political Theory 21 (3): 445–465. doi:10.1177/1474885119899232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. 2002. “Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorizing.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2): 131–150. doi:10.1177/004931032002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coady, D. 2003. “Conspiracy Theories and Official Stories.” The International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2): 197–209. doi:10.5840/ijap200317210.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. C. 1988. “Review of Psychosemantics by Jerry Fodor.” The Journal of Philosophy 85 (7): 384–389. doi:10.5840/jphil198885745.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2014. The Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2018a. “Expertise and Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology 32 (3): 196–208. doi:10.1080/02691728.2018.1440021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2018b. “The Problem of Conspiracism.” Argumenta 3 (2): 327–343. doi:10.23811/58.arg2017.den.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2018c. “Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously and Investigating Them.” In Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously, edited by M R. X. Dentith, 217–225. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2018d. “What Particularism About Conspiracy Theories Entails.” In Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously, edited by M R. X. Dentith, 59–69. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2019. “Conspiracy Theories and Philosophy: Bringing the Epistemology of a Freighted Term into the Social Sciences.” In Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, edited by Joseph E. Uscinski, 94–108. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2022. “Suspicious Conspiracy Theories.” Synthese 200 (243). doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03602-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. Forthcoming. “The Future of the Philosophy of Conspiracy Theory: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Conspiracy Theory Theory.” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X., and B. L. Keeley. 2018. “The Applied Epistemology of Conspiracy Theories: An Overview.” In The Routledge Handbook of Applied Epistemology, edited by D. Coady and J. Chase, 284–294. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., and R. M. Sutton. 2018. “Why Conspiracy Theories Matter: A Social Psychological Analysis.” European Review of Social Psychology 29 (1): 256–298. doi:10.1080/10463283.2018.1537428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., J. E. Uscinski, R. M. Sutton, A. Cichocka, T. Nefes, C. S. Ang, and F. Deravi. 2019. “Understanding Conspiracy Theories.” Political Psychology 40 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1111/pops.12568.
   Google Scholar
• Duetz, J. 2022. “Conspiracy Theories are Not Beliefs.” Erkenntnis. doi:10.1007/s10670-022-00620-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duetz, J. Forthcoming. “What Does It Mean for a Conspiracy Theory to Be a ‘Theory’” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodnight, G. T., and J. Poulakos. 1981. “Conspiracy Rhetoric: From Pragmatism to Fantasy in Public Discourse.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 45: 299–316. doi:10.1080/10570318109374052.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, K. 2020. “Is Conspiracy Theorizing Really Epistemically Problematic?” Episteme 19 (2): 197–219. doi:10.1017/epi.2020.19.
   Google Scholar
• Harambam, J., and S. Aupers. 2014. “Contesting Epistemic Authority: Conspiracy Theories on the Boundaries of Science.” Public Understanding of Science 24 (4): 466–480. doi:10.1177/0963662514559891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. 2018. “What’s Epistemically Wrong with Conspiracy Theorising?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84: 235–257. doi:10.1017/S1358246118000619.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. 2022. “Conspiracy Theories, Populism, and Epistemic Autonomy.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1–16. doi:10.1017/apa.2021.44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauswald, R. Forthcoming. “‘That’s Just a Conspiracy Theory!’: Relevant Alternatives, Dismissive Conversational Exercitives, and the Problem of Premature Conclusions.” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hookway, C. 2003. “How to Be a Virtue Epistemologist.” In Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology, edited by M. DePaul and L. Zagzebski, 183–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husting, G., and M. Orr. 2007. “Dangerous Machinery: “Conspiracy Theorist” as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion.” Symbolic Interaction 30 (2): 127–150. doi:10.1525/si.2007.30.2.127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. L. 2007. “God as the Ultimate Conspiracy Theory.” Episteme 4 (2): 135–149. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.135.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. L. Forthcoming. “Conspiracy Theory and (Or As) Folk Psychology.” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, N. 2007. “Radically Socialized Knowledge and Conspiracy Theories.” Episteme 4 (2): 181–192. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.181.
   Google Scholar
• Mittendorf, W. Forthcoming. “Conspiracy Theories and Democratic Legitimacy.” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napolitano, M. G. 2021. “Conspiracy Theories and Evidential Self-Insulation.” In The Epistemology of Fake News, edited by S. Bernecker, A. Flowerree, and T. Grundmann, 82–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Napolitano, M. G., and K. Reuter. 2021. “What is a Conspiracy Theory?” Erkenntnis, 1–28. doi:10.1007/s10670-021-00441-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nera, K., S. Leveaux, and P. P. L. E. Klein. 2020. “A ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Conspiracy? A Mixed Methods Investigation of Laypeople’s Rejection (And Acceptance) of a Controversial Label.” International Review of Social Psychology 33 (1): 13. doi:10.5334/irsp.401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelkmans, M., and R. Machold. 2001. “Conspiracy Theories and Their Truth Trajectories.” Focaal - Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 59: 66–80. doi:10.3167/fcl.2011.590105.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, N. Forthcoming. “Towards a Conceptual Framework for Conspiracy Theory Theories.” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. 1995. “Popper Revisited, or What is Wrong with Conspiracy Theories?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1177/004839319502500101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. 2006. “Complots of Mischief.” In Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate, edited by D. Coady, 139–166. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. Forthcoming. “Conspiracy Theory’ as a Tonkish Term—some Runabout Inference-Tickets from Truth to Falsehood.” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räikkä, J. 2009. “On Political Conspiracy Theories.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2): 185–201. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00300.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. G. 2017. “The Hidden Hand: Why Religious Studies Need to Take Conspiracy Theories Seriously.” Religion Compass 11: e12233. doi:10.1111/rec3.12233.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, M. 2022. “Rethinking Conspiracy Theories.” Synthese 200: 331. doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03811-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, M. Forthcoming. “Conceptual Engineering, Conceptual Domination, and the Case of Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, L. 2021. “Rhetorical Denialism: The Melancholic Affect of Conspiracy Rhetoric and Ideological (C)kynicism.” The Southern Communication Journal 86 (5): 447–459. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2021.1972650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, P. 2018a. “Conspiracy Theory and the Perils of Pure Particularism.” In Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously, edited by M R. X. Dentith, 25–37. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, P. 2018b. “On Some Moral Costs of Conspiracy Theory.” In Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously, edited by M R. X. Dentith, 189–202. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, P. Forthcoming. “The Normative Turn in Conspiracy Theory Theory?” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E. 2018. “The Study of Conspiracy Theories.” Argumenta 3 (2): 233–245. doi:10.23811/53.arg2017.usc.
   Google Scholar