Conspiracy Theory and (or as) Folk Psychology

References

• Baker, L. 1999. “Folk Psychology.” In MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, edited by R. A. Wilson and F. C. Keil, 319–320. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergamaschi Ganapini, M. 2023. “The Signaling Function of Sharing Fake Stories.” Mind & Language 38 (1): 64–80. doi:10.1111/mila.12373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchland, P. M. 1979. Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Churchland, P. M. 1981. “Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes.” The Journal of Philosophy 78 (2): 67–90. doi:10.5840/jphil198178268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchland, P. S. 1986. Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind/Brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Churchland, P. M. 1989. A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, D. 2006. Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, D. 2012. What to Believe Now? Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2014. The Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X., ed. 2018. Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2023. “Some Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2173539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X., and B. L. Keeley. 2019. “The Applied Epistemology of Conspiracy Theories: An Overview.” In Routledge Handbook on Applied Epistemology, edited by D. Coady and J. Chase, 284–294. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• deVries, W. A., and T. Triplett. 2000. Knowledge, Mind, and the Given: Reading Wilfrid Sellars’s “Empiricism and the Philosophy of the Mind.” Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Duetz, J. C. M. 2023. “What Does It Mean for a Conspiracy Theory to Be a ‘Theory’?” Social Epistemology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2172697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. K. 1963a. “How to Be a Good Empiricist; A Plea for Tolerance in Matters Epistemological.” In Philosophy of Science: The Delaware Seminar, Volume II, edited by B. Baumrin, 3–39. New York: Interscience Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. K. 1963b. “Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem.” The Review of Metaphysics 17 (1): 49–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. K. 1963c. “Mental Events and the Brain.” The Journal of Philosophy 60 (11): 295–296. doi:10.2307/2023030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funkhouser, E. 2022. “A Tribal Mind: Beliefs That Signal Group Identity or Commitment.” Mind & Language 37 (3): 444–464. doi:10.1111/mila.12326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golson, J. 2015. “The Most Logical (and Craziest) MH370 Conspiracy Theories.” Wired, March 5. https://www.wired.com/2015/03/logical-craziest-mh370-conspiracy-theories/.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. 2002. “The Crippled Epistemology of Extremism.” In Political Extremism and Rationality, edited by A. Breton, G. Galeotti, P. Salmon, and R. Wintrobe, 3–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husting, G., and M. Orr. 2005. “Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion.” Symbolic Interaction 30 (2): 127–150. doi:10.1525/si.2007.30.2.127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. L. 1999. “Of Conspiracy Theories.” The Journal of Philosophy 96 (3): 109–126. doi:10.2307/2564659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. L. 2005. Paul Churchland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. L. 2016. “Natural Mind.” In The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism, edited by K. J. Clark, 196–208. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. L. 2023. “Conspiracy Theories and Public Trust.” In The Moral Psychology of Trust, edited by D. Collins, I. V. Jovanović, and M. Alfano, 197-213. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nachman, G. 2009. Seriously Funny: The Rebel Comedians of the 1950s and 1960s. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Napolitano, M. G., and K. Reuter. 2021. “What is a Conspiracy Theory?” Erkenntnis. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10670-021-00441-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, M., and G. Husting. 2018. “Media Marginalization of Racial Minorities: ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ in U.S. Ghettos and on the ‘Arab Street.” In Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe in Them, edited by J. E. Uscinski, 82–93. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. R. Forthcoming. “‘Conspiracy Theory’ as a Tonkish Term: Some Runabout Inference-Tickets from Truth to Falsehood.” Social Epistemology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenscroft, I., and D. Hutto. 2021. “Folk Psychology as a Theory.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, July 1. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/folkpsych-theory.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, N. L., and R. Muirhead. 2020. A Lot of People are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, W. [1960] 1963. “Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man.” In Science, Perception and Reality, edited by W. Sellars, 1–40. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, M. 2023. “Conceptual Engineering, Conceptual Domination, and the Case of Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2172696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C., and A. Vermeule. 2009. “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2): 202–227. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsapos, M. 2023. “Who is a Conspiracy Theorist?” Social Epistemology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2172695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., ed. 2019. Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., J. Ligthart, R. Sabine, and Y. Xu. 2022. “The Entertainment Value of Conspiracy Theories.” British Journal of Psychology 113 (1): 25–48. doi:10.1111/bjop.12522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. 2015. “What We Mean When We Say ‘Conspiracy Theory’: The Assumptions Baked into a Familiar Phrase.” Reason Magazine, March 15. https://reason.com/2015/03/15/what-we-mean-when-we-say-conspiracy-theo.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. 2018. “What We Mean When We Say ‘Conspiracy Theory.’” In Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, edited by J. E. Uscinski, 53–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0003.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkes, K. V. 1984. “Pragmatics in Science and Theory in Common Sense.” Inquiry 27 (1–4): 339–361. doi:10.1080/00201748408602024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkes, K. V. 1991. “The Relationship Between Scientific Psychology and Common-Sense Psychology.” Synthese 89 (1): 15–39. doi:10.1007/BF00413797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar