‘Conspiracy Theory’ as a Tonkish Term: Some Runabout Inference-Tickets from Truth to Falsehood

References

• Basham, Lee. 2003. “Malevolent Global Conspiracy.” Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1): 91–103. Wiley Online Library. doi:10.1111/1467-9833.00167.
   Google Scholar
• Belnap, Nuel D. 1962. “Tonk, Plonk and Plink.” Analysis 22: 130–134. doi:10.1093/analys/22.6.130.
   Google Scholar
• Bilewicz, Michał. 2022. “Conspiracy Beliefs as an Adaptation to Historical Trauma.” Current Opinion in Psychology 47. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, David, Thomas Piecha, and Peter Schroeder-Heister. 2022. “Popper’s Theory of Deductive Logic.” In The Logical Writings of Karl Popper, 1–79. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, Richard B. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, David. 2003. “Conspiracy Theories and Official Stories.” The International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2): 199–211. doi:10.5840/ijap200317210.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2014. The Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• de Zavala, Agnieszka Golec, Kinga Bierwiaczonek, and Pawel Ciesielski. 2022. “An Interpretation of Meta-Analytical Evidence for the Link Between Collective Narcissism and Conspiracy Theories.” Current Opinion in Psychology 47. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duetz, J. 2023. “What Does It Mean for a Conspiracy Theory to Be a ‘Theory’?” Social Epistemology 37 (4): 438–453. doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2172697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dummett, Michael. 1981. Frege: The Philosophy of Language. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul. 1978. Science in a Free Society. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, Kurtis. 2020. “Should Academics Debunk Conspiracy Theories?” Social Epistemology 34 (5): 423–439. doi:10.1080/02691728.2020.1747118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, Brian L. 1999. “Of Conspiracy Theories.” The Journal of Philosophy 96 (3): 109–126. doi:10.2307/2564659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Joanne, Kyle Saunders, and Christine Farhart. 2015. “Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 824–844. doi:10.1111/ajps.12234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrave, Alan. 1980. “Wittgensteinian Instrumentalism.” Theoria 46 (2–3): 65–105. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1980.tb00691.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pigden, Charles. 1995. “Popper Revisited or What is Wrong with Conspiracy Theories?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1177/004839319502500101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigden, Charles. 2006. “Complots of Mischief.” In Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate, edited by David Coady, 139–166. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Pigden, Charles. 2007. “Conspiracy Theories and the Conventional Wisdom.” Episteme 4 (2): 219–232. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.219.
   Google Scholar
• Pigden, Charles. 2016. “Are Conspiracy Theories Epistemically Vicious?” In The Blackwell Companion to Applied Philosophy, edited by Coady Brownlee and Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, 120–132. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pigden, Charles. 2019. “Conspiracy Theories, Deplorables and Defectibility: A Reply to Patrick Stokes.” In Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously, edited by M. Dentith, 201–213. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Pigden, Charles. 2022. “Conspiracy Theories and the Conventional Wisdom Revisited.” In Secrets and Conspiracies, edited by Olli Loukola, 126–156. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl. 1972a. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl. 1972b. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, Arthur. 1960. “The Runabout Inference Ticket.” Analysis 21: 38–39. doi:10.1093/analys/21.2.38.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, Arthur. 1964. “Conjunction and Contonktion Revisited.” Analysis 24: 191–196. doi:10.1093/analys/24.6.191.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, Arthur. 1976. Papers in Logic and Ethics. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, Gilbert. 1950. “‘If,’ ‘So,’ and ‘Because.” In Philosophical Analysis, edited by M. Black, 323–340. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, Gilbert. 1971. Collected Papers. Vol. 2. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, M. 2023. “Conceptual Engineering, Conceptual Domination, and the Case of Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology 37 (4): 464–480. doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2172696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, David, Brian Rogers, and Gabriel Citron. 2016. Wittgenstein Lectures, Cambridge 1930–1933: From the Notes of G. E. Moore. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F., ed. 1967. Philosophical Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsapos, Melina. 2023. “Who is a ‘Conspiracy Theorist’?” Social Epistemology 37 (4): 454–463. doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2172695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1975. Philosophical Remarks. Translated by Raymond Hargreaves and Roger White and edited by Rush Rhees. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, Rolf A. 2022. “Conspiracy Thinking as Situation Model Construction.” Current Opinion in Psychology 47: 101413. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar