Notes on the diatom collection of the Natural History Museum, London (BM) VIII: the types of Arachnoidiscus in Brown’s monograph (Brown 1933)

References

• Blanco S. & Wetzel C. E. 2016. Replacement names for botanical taxa involving algal genera. Phytotaxa 266: 195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bone E. C. P. 1969. Glyphodiscus stellatus Greville. Note on the dissimilar nature of the component valves of this diatom. Microscope (Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club) 31: 113–114.
   Google Scholar
• Brown N. E. 1914. Some notes on the structure of diatoms. The Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, ser 2(74): 317–338.
   Google Scholar
• Brown N. E. 1919a. Microscopical: Arachnoidiscus ornatus. English Mechanic and World of Science 110: 103.
   Google Scholar
• Brown N. E. 1919b. Microscopical: Arachnoidiscus ornatus. English Mechanic and World of Science 110: 165.
   Google Scholar
• Brown N. E. 1920a. New and old species of Mesembryanthemum, with critical notes. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 45: 53–140.
   Google Scholar
• Brown N. E. 1920b. New and old diatoms from the Antarctic regions. English Mechanic and World of Science 111: 210.
   Google Scholar
• Brown N. E. 1920c. Some new and old Antarctic diatoms. Part II. English Mechanic and World of Science 111(2880): 219–220.
   Google Scholar
• Brown N. E. 1920d. Some new and old Antarctic diatoms. Part III. English Mechanic and World of Science 111(2881): 232–233.
   Google Scholar
• Brown N. E. 1932. The structure of diatoms. Watson’s Microscopical Record 27: 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brown N. E. 1933a. Arachnoidiscus. An account of the genus, comprising its history, distribution, development and growth of the frustule, structure and its examination and purpose in life, and a key to and descriptions of all known species, illustrated. W. Watson & Sons, Ltd., London, 88 pp., 7 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Brown N. E. 1933b. The structure of diatoms (continued). Watson’s Microscopical Record 28: 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Brown N. E. 1934. The structure of diatoms. The Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club 23: 52–65.
   Google Scholar
• Brun J. 1896. Diatomées Miocènes, description des espèces. Le Diatomiste 2(24): 229–247.
   Google Scholar
• Castracane F. 1886. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Botany, volume II, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson B. 2007. Topping slides 1840–50. Quekett Journal of Microscopy 40: 375–388.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson B. & Lynk H. 2010. The papered slides of C.M. Topping. Quekett Journal of Microscopy 41: 311–321.
   Google Scholar
• Desikachary T.V. & Ranjitha Devi K.A. 1986. Marine fossil diatoms from India and Indian Ocean region. In: Atlas of Diatoms (Ed. by T.V. Desikachary), Madras Science Foundation, Madras. fasc. I, pls 1–7 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C. G. 1844. Einige vorläufige Resultate seiner Untersuchungen der ihm von der Südpolreise des Capitain Rofs, so wie von den Herren Schayer und Darwin zugekommenen Materialien über das Verhalten des kleinsten lebens in den Oceanen und den gröfsten bisher zugänglichen Tiefen des Weltmeers. Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1844: 182–207.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C. G. 1848. Über zwei neue Genera kieselschaliger Polygastern aus dem Guano und über die neue Art von Guano aus Patagonien, welche das dänische Schiff Waldemar 1847 gebracht hat. Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1848: 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C. G. 1849. Weitere Mittheilung über Resultate bei Anwendung des chromatisch-polarisirten Lichtes für mikroskopische Verhältnisse. Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1849: 55–76.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C. G. 1854. Mikrogeologie. Einundvierzig Tafeln mit über viertausend grossentheils colorirten Figuren, Gezeichnet vom Verfasser. Leopold Voss, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Frenguelli J. & Orlando H.A. 1958. Diatomeas y Silicoflagelados del Sector Antartico Sudamericano. In: Instituto Antartico Argentino Publicacion, no. 5. Buenos Aires, 191 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Gill S., n.d. The Letters of Samuel Henry Meakin to Charles Leslie Odam (1948–1950). http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/diatomist/SHMletters.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Greville R. K. 1865. Descriptions of new and rare diatoms. Series XVI. Transactions of the Microscopical Society, London, n.s 13: 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hajós M. 1976. Upper Eocene and lower Oligocene Diatomaceae, Archaeomonadaceae, and Silicoflagellatae in southwestern Pacific sediments, DSDP Leg 29. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 35: 817–883.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna G. D., Hendey N. I. & Brigger A. L. 1976. Some Eocene diatoms from South Atlantic Cores, Part 1. New and rare species of Arachnoidiscus. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences 123: 2–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hoban M. A., Fryxell G. A. & Buck K. R. 1980. Biddulphioid diatoms: resting spores in Antarctic Eucampia and Odontella. Journal of Phycology 16: 591–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson J. 1935. Nicholas Edward Brown [obituary]. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew) 1: 58–61.
   Google Scholar
• Janisch C. & Rabenhorst L. 1863. Ueber Meeres-Diatomaceen von Honduras. In: Beiträge zur näheren Kenntniss und Verbreitung der Algen. Herausgegeben von Dr. L. Rabenhorst. Leipzig, Verlag von Eduard Kummer 1: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Karsten G. 1905. Das Phytoplankton des Antarktischen Meeres nach dem Material der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition 1898–1899. Wissenschaftliche ergebnisse der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer Valdivia 1898–1899, von Carl Chun. Frommannsche Buchdruckerei (Hermann Pohle) 2(2): 1–136.
   Google Scholar
• Kitton F. 1875. On the genus Arachnoidiscus. Hardwicke's Science-Gossip 126: 121–123.
   Google Scholar
• Kociolek J. P. B., Coste M. S., Ector L., Liu Y., Karthick B., Kulikovskiy M., Lundholm N., Ludwig T., Potapova M., Rimet F., Sabbe K., Sala S., Sar E., Taylor J., Van de Vijver B., Wetzel C. E., Williams D. M., Witkowski A. & Witkowski J., 2023. DiatomBase. Accessed at https://www.diatombase.org on 2023-04-29.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntze O., 1898. Revisio Generum Plantarum. Part III. Leipzig, 576 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lynk H. 2018. The slides of C.M. Topping - another look. Quekett Journal of Microscopy 43: 181–193.
   Google Scholar
• Lynk H., 2023. ‘A cabinet of curiosities’ (http://www.victorianmicroscopeslides.com/slides.htm).
   Google Scholar
• Lynk H. & Nuttall R. H. 2005. A note on some newly-identified topping slides. Quekett Journal of Microscopy 40: 61–63.
   Google Scholar
• Mann A. 1907. Report on the diatoms of the Albatross Voyages in the Pacific Ocean, 1888–1904. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 10 (5): 221–419.
   Google Scholar
• Mann A. 1937. Diatoms. Australasian Antarctic Expedition, 1911–1914, scientific reports, series C, 1 (1), Zoology and Botany, 82 pp. David Harold Paisley, Government Printer, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Mawson D. 1914. Australasian Antarctic expedition, 1911–1914. The Geographical Journal 44(3): 257–284.
   Google Scholar
• McEwin E. 2018. The many lives of Douglas Mawson. Australian Scholarly Publishing Pty Ltd, North Melbourne. 232 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Mills F. W. 1933. An index to the genera and species of the diatomaceae and their synonyms. 1816–1932. Part 6 (Ch–Co). Wheldon & Wesley, Limited, London, pp. 373–448.
   Google Scholar
• Molinari-Novoa E. & Guiry M. D. 2021. Nomenclatural notes on algae. V. New names for various algal taxa, mostly at the species rank. Notulae Algarum 184: 17. pp.
   Google Scholar
• Natural History Museum, 2023a. Data Portal query on 1 resources created at 2023-04-17 19:38:50.669252 PID https://doi.org/10.5519/qd.mpn60rsw.
   Google Scholar
• Natural History Museum, 2023b. Data Portal query on 1 resources created at 2023-04-17 21:41:41.907633 PID https://doi.org/10.5519/qd.u56d9kwh.
   Google Scholar
• Natural History Museum, 2023c. Data Portal query on 1 resources created at 2023-04-17 21:48:48.303623 PID https://doi.org/10.5519/qd.vxzqls38.
   Google Scholar
• Natural History Museum, 2023d. Data Portal query on 1 resources created at 2023-04-18 11:41:22.007092 PID https://doi.org/10.5519/qd.nzju3sdy.
   Google Scholar
• Natural History Museum, 2023e. Data Portal query on 1 resources created at 2023-04-18 11:43:16.395201 PID https://doi.org/10.5519/qd.jeb6stod.
   Google Scholar
• Natural History Museum, 2023f. Data Portal query on 1 resources created at 2023-04-18 12:11:32.102844 PID https://doi.org/10.5519/qd.won293m5.
   Google Scholar
• Natural History Museum, 2023g. Data Portal query on 1 resources created at 2023-04-18 22:37:05.476003 PID https://doi.org/10.5519/qd.0ipcro8e.
   Google Scholar
• Natural History Museum, 2023h. Data Portal query on 1 resources created at 2023-04-19 11:01:51.090309 PID https://doi.org/10.5519/qd.oy9rwi38.
   Google Scholar
• Palla R. 2016. Valdivia. Die Geschichte der ersten deutschen TiefseeExpedition. Galiani, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Pantocsek J., 1886. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Fossilen Bacillarien Ungarns. Teil I, Marine Bacillarien. Nagy-Tapolcsány, Buchdrucherei von Julius Platzko, 74 pp., 30 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Peragallo M., 1897. Le Catalogue Général des Diatomées. Clermont-Ferrand, 472 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Peragallo M. 1921. Diatomées d’eau douce et Diatomées d’eau salée. In: Deuxième Expédition Antarctique Française (1908-1910) commandée par le Dr. Jean Charcot, Sciences Naturelles: Documents Scientifiques, Botanique. Masson et Cie, Paris. 38 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhold T. 1937 [1938]. Fossil diatoms of the Neogene of Java and their zonal distribution. Verhandelingen van het Geologisch-Mijnbouwkindig Genootschap voor nederland Kolonien, Geol. Serie 12: 43–133.
   Google Scholar
• Romero O. 2011. Morphological study of the genus Cocconeis Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyceae) collected during the 1897–1899 Belgian Antarctic Expedition. Botanica Marina 54: 179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxton T. R. 1919. Microscopical: Arachnoidiscus ornatus. English Mechanic and World of Science 110: 198–199.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A., 1876. Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde. Aschersleben, Commissions-Verlag Von Ludwig Siever’s Buchandlung, series I, heft 9–10, pls 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A., 1881. Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde. Aschersleben, Commissions-Verlag Von Ludwig Siever’s Buchandlung, series II, Heft 17–18, pls 65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A., 1882. Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde. Aschersleben, Commissions-Verlag Von Ludwig Siever’s Buchandlung, series II, Heft 19, pls 73–76.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A., 1890. Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde. Aschersleben, Commissions-Verlag Von Ludwig Siever’s Buchandlung, series IV, Heft 37–38, pls 145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A., 1896. Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde. Aschersleben, Commissions-Verlag Von Ludwig Siever’s Buchandlung, series V, Heft 51, pls 201–204.
   Google Scholar
• Shadbolt G. 1852. On the structure of the siliceous loricae of the genus Arachnoidiscus. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London 3: 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen R. 1982. Note on the genus Charcotia M. Peragallo. Bacillaria 5: 101–116.
   Google Scholar
• Singh P., Vimal K. P. & Nautiyal D. D. 1978. Early Pliocene diatoms and silicoflagellates from Neill Island, South Andaman, India, Part I. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India 21–22: 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson B. & Lynk H., 2019. Charles Morgan Topping, 1799–1874. Micscape 275: http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/indexmag.html [from: Stevenson, B., Historical Makers of Microscopes and Microscope Slides, http://microscopist.net/ToppingCM.html].
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson B., 2023. Historical makers of microscopes and microscope slides. (http://microscopist.net/).
   Google Scholar
• Sundström B.G. 1986. The marine diatom genus Rhizosolenia, a new approach to the taxonomy. Doctoral Thesis (monograph), Lund University, Faculty of Science, 117 pp., 39 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Truan Y., Luard A. & Witt O. N. 1888. Die Diatomaceen der Polycystinenkreide von Jeremie in Hayti, Westindien. Friedlander et Sohn, Berlin. 24 pp., 7 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Van Heurck H. 1896. A Treatise on the Diatomaceae (translated by W.E. Baxter). William Wesley & Son, London. 558 pp. 35 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Van Heurck H. 1909. Expédition Antarctique Belge, Résultats du Voyage du S.Y. Belgica en 1897–1898–1899. Rapports Scientifiques. Botanique Diatomées. Imprim. J.-E. Buschmann, Antwerpen, pp. 1–129, pp, 13 pls.
   Google Scholar
• VanLandingham S. L. 1968. Catalogue of the fossil and recent genera and species of diatoms and their synonyms. Part II. Bacteriastrum through Coscinodiscus. J. Cramer 2: 494–1086.
   Google Scholar
• Walker-Arnott G. 1858a. On Arachnoidiscus. Quarterly Journal of the Microscopical Society 6: 159–165.
   Google Scholar
• Walker-Arnott G. 1858b. On Arachnoidiscus, Pleurosigma, Amphiprora, Eunotia, and Amphora. Quarterly Journal of the Microscopical Society 6: 195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Williams D. M. In press. A preliminary guide to the diatom collection of Norman Ingram Hendey (1903–2004). Bibliotheca Diatomologica 69.
   Google Scholar
• Wolle F. 1890. Diatomaceae of North America, Illustrated with twenty-three hundred figures from the Author's drawings on one hundred and twelve plates. Comenius Press, Bethlehem. Pennsylvania, USA, 112 pls.
   Google Scholar