Assessment of the ecological status of large lowland rivers (Sava and Tisa, Serbia) based on digital microscopic investigation of the diatom communities

References

• Alvarez-Blanco I., Cejudo-Figueiras C., Bécares E. & Blanco S. 2011. Spatiotemporal changes in diatom ecological profiles: implications for biomonitoring. Limnology 12: 157–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson M. J., Ellingsen K. E. & McArdle B. H. 2006. Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecology Letters 9: 683–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrejić J., Krizmanić J. & Cvijan M. 2012. Diatom species composition of the Nišava River and its tributaries Jerma and Temska rivers (southern Serbia). Archives of Biological Sciences 64: 1127–1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babić G., Vuković M., Voza D., Takić L. & Mladenović-Ranisavljević I. 2019. Assessing Surface Water Quality in the Serbian Part of the Tisa River Basin. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 28: 4073–4085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilous O. P., Genkal S. I., Zimmermann J., Kusber W. H. & Jahn R. 2021. Centric diatom diversity in the lower part of the Southern Bug River (Ukraine): the transitional zone at Mykolaiv city. PhytoKeys 178: 31–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borgwardt F., Leitner P., Graf W. & Birk S. 2019. Ex uno plures–defining different types of very large rivers in Europe to foster solid aquatic bio-assessment. Ecological Indicators 107: 105599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormans M. & Condie AS. 1998. Modelling the distribution of Anabaena and Melosira in a stratified river weir pool. Hydrobiologia 364: 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burfeid-Castellanos A. M., Martín-Martín R. P., Kloster M., Angulo-Preckler C., Avila C. & Beszteri B. 2021. Epiphytic diatom community structure and richness is determined by macroalgal host and location in the South Shetland Islands (Antarctica). PLoS ONE 16: e0250629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burfeid-Castellanos A. M., Kloster M., Beszteri S., Postel U., Spyra M., Zurowietz M., Nattkemper T. W. & Beszteri B. 2022. A digital light microscopic method for diatom surveys using embedded acid-cleaned samples. Water 14: 3332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čađo S., Miletić A. & Đurković A., 2008. The composition and biomass of phytoplankton of the Sava River. BALWOIS conference Ohrid, – Republic of Macedonia. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• CEMAGREF, 1982. Etude des méthodes biologiques quantitative d'appréciation de la qualité des eaux. Rapport Division Qualité des Eaux Lyon – Agence financière de Bassin Rhône–Méditerranée–Corse, Pierre-Bénite, 218 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Costa A. P. T. & Schneck F. 2022. Diatoms as indicators in running waters: trends of studies on biological assessment and monitoring. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 194: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jonge M., Van de Vijver B., Blust R. & Bervoets L. 2008. Responses of aquatic organisms to metal pollution in a lowland river in Flanders: a comparison of diatoms and macroinvertebrates. Science of the Total Environment 407: 615–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denić L., Stojanović Z., Dopuđa-Glišić T., Čađo S., Đurković A. & Novaković B. 2023. Rezultati ispitivanja kvaliteta površinskih i podzemnih voda za 2021. Godinu. Ministarstvo poljoprivrede i zaštite životne sredine, Agencija za zaštitu životne sredine, Beograd. 363 pp (in Serbian).
   Google Scholar
• Du Buf H. & Bayer M. 2002. Series in machine perception and artificial intelligence. In: Automatic diatom identification (Ed. Hans du Buf). World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore. 328 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Fore L. S. & Grafe C. 2002. Using diatoms to assess the biological condition of large rivers in Idaho (USA). Freshwater Biology 47: 2015–2037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houk V., Klee R. & Tanaka H. 2010. Atlas of freshwater centric diatoms with a brief key and descriptions, Part III. Stephanodiscaceae A. Cyclotella, Tertiarius, Discostella. Fottea 10: 1–498.
   Google Scholar
• Houk V., Klee R. & Tanaka H. 2014. Atlas of freshwater centric diatoms with a brief key and descriptions. Part IV. Stephanodiscaceae B. Stephanodiscus, Cyclostephanos, Pliocaenicus, Hemistephanos, Stephanocostis. Mesodictyon & Spicaticribra. Fottea (Supplement 14: 1–530.
   Google Scholar
• Kahlert M., Kelly M., Albert R. L., Almeida S. F. P., Bešta T., Blanco S., et al. 2012. Identification versus counting protocols as sources of uncertainty in diatom-based ecological status assessments. Hydrobiologia 695: 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly M. G. & Whitton B. A. 1995. The trophic diatom index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology 7: 433–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly M., Juggins S., Guthrie R., Pritchard S., Jamieson J., Rippey B., Hirst H. & Yallop M. 2008. Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms. Freshwater Biology 53: 403–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly M. G., Chiriac G., Soare-Minea A., Hamchevici C. & Birk S. 2019. Defining ecological status of phytobenthos in very large rivers: A case study in practical implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Romania. Hydrobiologia 828: 353–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly M. G., Free G., Kolada A., Phillips G., Warner S., Wolfram G. & Poikane S. 2023. Warding off freshwater salinization: Do current criteria measure up? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water: e1694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss K., Klee R., Ector L. & Acs E. 2012. Centric diatoms of large rivers and tributaries in Hungary: morphology and biogeographic distribution. Acta Botanica Croatica 71: 311–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloster M., Esper O., Kauer G. & Beszteri B. 2017. Large-Scale Permanent Slide Imaging and Image Analysis for Diatom Morphometrics. Applied Sciences 7: 330.
   Google Scholar
• Kókai Z., Bácsi I., Török P., Buczkó K., Balogh C. & Tóthmérész B. 2015. Halophilic diatom taxa are sensitive indicators of even short-term changes in lowland lotic systems. Acta Botanica Croatica 74: 287–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krammer K. & Lange-Bertalot, H. 1988. Bacillariophyceae 2/2, Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surierellaceae. In: Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Vol. 2, Ed. H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 1–612.
   Google Scholar
• Langenkämper D., Zurowietz M., Schoening T. & Nattkemper T. W. 2017. BIIGLE 2.0 - browsing and annotating large marine image collections. Frontiers in Marine Science 4: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange-Bertalot H. 2001. Navicula sensu stricto, 10 genera separated from Navicula sensu lato, Frustulia. In: Diatoms of Europe Vol. 2: (Ed. H. Lange-Bertalot), A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G, pp. 1–526.
   Google Scholar
• Lange-Bertalot H., Hofmann G., Werum M. & Cantonati M. 2017. Freshwater benthic diatoms of Central Europe: over 800 common species used in ecological assessments. English edition with updated taxonomy and added species. Koeltz Botanical Books, Schmitten-Oberreifenberg. pp. 1–942.
   Google Scholar
• Laušević R., Nikitović J. & Tomašević V. 1998. Phytoplankton in River Sava near Belgrade. Ekologija 33: 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lecointe C., Coste M. & Prygiel J. 1993. “Omnidia”: software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management. Hydrobiologia 269: 509–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecointe C. & Coste M., 2015. Omnidia. Available online: https://omnidia.fr/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Liška I., Wagner F., Sengl M., Deutsch K., Slobodnik J. & Paunović M., 2019-2020. Joint Danube Survey 4. A shared analysis of the Danube River. International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River, Vienna, Austria, 565 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Morin S., Gómez N., Tornés E., Licursi M. & Rosebery J. 2016. Benthic diatom monitoring and assessment of freshwater environments: standard methods and future challenges. Aquatic Biofilms: Ecology, Water Quality and Wastewater Treatment 15: 111–124.
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen J., Simpson G., Blanchet F., Kindt R., Legendre P., Minchin P., O'Hara R., Solymos P., Stevens M., Szoecs E., Wagner H., Barbour M., Bedward M., Bolker B., Borcard D., Carvalho G., Chirico M., De Caceres M., Durand S., Evangelista H., FitzJohn R., Friendly M., Furneaux B., Hannigan G., Hill M., Lahti L., McGlinn D., Ouellette M., Ribeiro Cunha E., Smith T., Stier A., Ter Braak C. & Weedon J. 2022. . vegan: community ecology package. R Package Version 2: 6–4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package = vegan.
   Google Scholar
• Pantelić M. M., Dolinaj D. M., Leščešen I. I., Savić S. M. & Milošević D. D. 2015. Water quality of the Pannonian basin rivers the Danube, the Sava and the Tisa (Serbia) and its correlation with air temperature. Thermal Science 19: 477–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil I. 2021. Visualizations with statistical details: The ‘ggstatsplot’ approach. Journal of Open-Source Software 6: 3167.
   Google Scholar
• Popovic A., Djordjevic D. & Polic P. 2001. Trace and major element pollution originating from coal ash suspension and transport processes. Environment International 26:251–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prygiel J. & Coste M. 2000. Guide méthodologique pour la mise en oeuvre de l’Indice Biologique Diatomées. Agences de L’Eau—Cemagref, Bordeaux. 178 pp.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2023. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Austria. https://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Rott E., Hofmann G., Pall K., Pfister P. & Pipp E., 1997. Indikationslisten für Aufwuchsalgen, Teil 1: Saprobielle Indikation. Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirt-schaft, Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Ržaničanin A. M., Cvijan M. V. & Krizmanić J. 2005. Phytoplankton of the Tisa River. Archives of Biological Sciences 57: 223–235.
   Google Scholar
• Schöll F., Birk S. & Böhmer J., 2012. XGIG Large River Intercalibration Exercise – WFD Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 6 Report, 73 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Simić B.S., Karadžić R.V., Cvijan V.M. & Vasiljević M.B. 2015. Algal communities along the Sava River. In: The handbook of environmental chemistry (ED. R. Milačić, J. Ščančar & M. Paunović), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 229–248 pp.
   Google Scholar
• SRPS ISO 8245 2007. Water quality — guidelines for the determination of total organic carbon (TOC) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Institute for standardization of Serbia, Belgrade. pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• SRPS EN 12260 2008. Water quality – determination of nitrogen – determination of bound nitrogen (TNb), following oxidation to nitrogen oxides. Institute for standardization of Serbia, Belgrade. 14 pp.
   Google Scholar
• SRPS EN ISO 6878, 2008. Water quality - determination of phosphorus - ammonium molybdate spectrometric method (ISO 6878:2004). Institute for Standardization of Serbia, Belgrade. 30 pp.
   Google Scholar
• SRPS EN ISO 14911. 2009. Water quality – determination of dissolved Li+, Na+, NH4+, K+, Mn2+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Sr2+ and Ba2+ using ion chromatography – method for water and waste water. Institute for Standardization of Serbia, Belgrade. 20 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Stenger-Kovács C., Béres V. B., Buczkó K., Tapolczai K., Padisák J., Selmeczy G. B. & Lengyel E. 2023. Diatom community response to inland water salinization: a review. Hydrobiologia 26: 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Szczepocka E., Szulc B., Szulc K., Rakowska B. & Żelazna-Wieczorek J. 2014. Diatom indices in the biological assessment of the water quality based on the example of a small lowland river. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 43: 265–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanos P., Kovács J., Kovács S., Anda A. & Hatvani I. G. 2015. Optimization of the monitoring network on the River Tisza (Central Europe, Hungary) using combined cluster and discriminant analysis, taking seasonality into account. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 187: 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor J. C., Harding W. R. & Archibald C. G. M., 2007. WRC report TT 281/07: A methods manual for the collection, preparation and analysis of diatom samples. Version 1.0. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa. 49 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Tekwani N., Majdi N., Mialet B., Tornès E., Urrea-Clos G., Buffan-Dubau E., Sabater S. & Tackx M. 2013. Contribution of epilithic diatoms to benthic-pelagic coupling in a temperate river. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 69: 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomović G., Sabovljević M. S., Shivarov V. V., Assyov B., Bozok F., Tamas G., Ștefănuț S., Perić R., Knežević J., et al. 2023. New records and noteworthy data of plants, algae and fungi in SE Europe and adjacent regions, 14. Botanica Serbica 47: 347–359.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA, 1997. Method 300.1: Determination of inorganic anions in drinking water by ion chromatography (revision 1.0). U.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dam H., Mertens A. & Sinkeldam J. 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from The Netherlands. Netherland Journal of Aquatic Ecology 28: 117–133.
   Google Scholar
• Vasiljević B., Simić S. B., Paunović M., Zuliani T., Krizmanić J., Marković V. & Tomović J. 2017. Contribution to the improvement of diatom-based assessments of the ecological status of large rivers–The Sava River Case Study. Science of the Total Environment 605: 874–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilbaste S. & Truu J. 2003. Distribution of benthic diatoms in relation to environmental variables in lowland streams. Hydrobiologia 493: 81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham H., Averick M., Bryan J., Chang W., McGowan L. D., François R., Grolemund G., Hayes A., Henry L., Hester J., Kuhn M., Pedersen T. L., Miller E., Bache S. M., Müller K., Ooms J., Robinson D., Seidel D. P., Spinu V., Takahashi K., Vaughan D., Wilke C., Woo K. & Yutani H. 2019. Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software 4: 1686.
   Google Scholar
• Zainab A. & Al-Tameemi J. S. A. H. 2022. Evaluating water quality of Euphrates river within the Karbala governorate by using diatoms algae of aquatic plants. Indian Journal of Ecology 49: 155–160.
   Google Scholar
• Zlatković S., Medić O., Predojević D., Nikolić I., Subakov-Simić G., Onjia A., Berić T. & Stanković S. 2022. Spatio-temporal dynamics in physico-chemical properties, phytoplankton and bacterial diversity as an indication of the Bovan reservoir water quality. Water 14: 931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar