250
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Brain injury rehabilitation: what works for whom and when?

&
Pages 385-395 | Published online: 03 Jul 2009

  • CHESNUT, R. M., CARNEY, N., MAYNARD, H. et al.: Rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. AHCPR. Publ. no. 99-E006, February, 1999.
  • FLEMINGER, S. and POWELL, J.: Editorial. In: S Fleminger and J Powell (editors) Evaluation of Outcomes in Brain Injury Rehabilitation (UK: Psychology Press), pp. 225-230, 1999.
  • ROTH, A. and FONAGY, P.: What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research (New York: Guilford Press), 1996.
  • HIGH, W. M., BOAKE, C. and LEHMKHUL, L. D.: Critical analysis of studies evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilatation after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10: 14-26, 1995.
  • CICERONE, K. D., DAHLBERG, C., KALMAR, K. et al.: Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Ariches of Physical Medical Rehabilitation, 81: 1596-1615, 2000.
  • RATTOK, J., BEN-YISHAY, Y., EZRACHI, O. et al.: Outcome of different treatment mixes in a multidimensional neuropsychological rehabilitation programme. Neuropsychology, 6: 395-416, 1992.
  • ANONYMOUS EDITORIAL: Prediction from RCTs. Bondolier 90, 8(8): 5-7, 2001. http://www. ebandolier.com.
  • KING, M. B.: Brief psychotherapy in general practice: who do we measure outcome? British Journal of General Practice, 47: 136-137, 1997.
  • FRIEDLI, K. and KING, M.: Psychological treatments and their evaluation. International Review of Psychiatry, 10: 123-126, 1998.
  • WILSON, B.A.: Research and evaluation in rehabilitation. In: B.A. Wilson and D.L. McLellan (editors) The handbook of rehabilitation studies (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), pp. 161-187, 1997.
  • CHESNUT, R. M., CARNEY, N., MAYNARD, H. et al.: Summary report: evidence report on rehabilitation of person with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 14: 176-188, 1999.
  • BLACK, N.: Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. British Medical Journal, 312, 1215-1218, 1996.
  • WADE, D. T., CRAWFORD, S., WENDEN, F. J. et al.: Does routine follow up after head injury help? A randomised controlled trail. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 62: 478-484, 1997.
  • WADE, D. T., KING, N. S., WENDEN, F. J. et al.: Routine follow up after head injury: a second randomised controlled trial. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 65: 177-183, 1998.
  • SA AZAR, A. M., WARDEN, D. L., SCHWAB, K. et al.: Cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. A randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283: 3075-3081; Editorial comment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283: 3123-3124, 2000.
  • BRAVERMAN, S. E., SPECTOR, J., WARDEN, D. L. et al.: A multidisciplimary TBI inpatient rehabilitation programme for active duty service members as part of a randomized clinical trial. Brain Injury, 13: 405-415, 1999.
  • PANIAK, C., TOLLER-LOBE, G., DURAND, A. et al.: A randomized trial of two treatments for mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 12: 1011-1023, 1998.
  • TUEL, S. M., PRESTY, S. K., MEYTHALER, J. M. et al.: Functional improvement in severe head injury after readmission for rehabilitation. Brain Injury, 6: 363-372, 1992.
  • RYAN, T. V. and RUFF, R. M.: The efficacy of structured memory retraining in a group comparison of head trauma patients. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3: 165-179, 1988.
  • BENEDICT, R. and WECHSLER, F.: Evaluation of memory retraining in head-injured adults; two single-case experimental designs. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 7: 84-93, 1992.
  • CANCELLIERE, A. E. B., MONCUDA, C. and REID, D. T.: Memory training to support educational reintegration. Archives of Physical Medical Rehabilitation, 72: 148-151, 1991.
  • ZENCIUS, A., WESOLOWSKI, M. D. and BURKE, W. H.: A comparison of four memory strategies with traumatically brain-injured clients. Brain Injury, 4: 33-38, 1990.
  • PENDER, N. and FLEMINGER, S.: Outcome measures on impatient cognitive and behavioural units: an overview. In: S. Fleminger and J. Powell (editors) Evaluation of Outcomes in Brain Injury Rehabilitation (Hove, UK: Psychology Press), pp. 345-361, 1999.
  • EAMES, P. and WOOD, R.: Rehabilitation after severe brain injury: a follow-up study of a behaviour modification approach. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 48: 613-619, 1985.
  • ALDERMAN, N., FRY, R. K. and YOUNGSON, H. A.: Improvement of self-monitoring skills, reduction of behaviour distrubance and the dysexecutive syndrome: comparison of response cost and a new programme of self-monitoring training. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 5: 193-221, 1995.
  • ALDERMAN, N. and KNIGHT, C.: The effectiveness of DRL in the management and treatment of severe behaviour disorders following brain injury. Brain Injury, 11: 79-101, 1997.
  • BAJO, A., HAZAN, J., FLEMINGER, S. et al.: Rehabilitation on a cognitive behavioural unit is associated with chagnes in FAM, not FIM. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 9: 413-419, 1999.
  • WILSON, B. A.: Cognitive rehabilitation: how it is and how it might be. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3: 487-496, 1997.
  • EVANS, J. J., WILSON, B., SCHURI, U. et al.: A comparison of 'errors' and 'trial-and-error' learning methods for teaching individuals with acquired memory deficits. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10: 67-101, 2000.
  • PRIGATANO, G. P.: Learning from our successes and failure: refletions and comment on 'cognitive rehabilitation: how it is and how it might be'. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3: 497-499, 1997.
  • SHALLICE, T.: Cognitive neuropsychology and rehabilitation: is pessmism justified? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10: 209-217, 2000.
  • ALDERMAN, N.: Ecological validity of a simplified version of the multiple errands test: can it be used to drive treatment options and measure outcome in the rehabilitation of executive disorders? Paper presented at Impact 2000. International 3 day brain injury conference. Nottingham University, 2000.
  • WILSON, B. A., EVANS, J. J., EMSLIE, H. et al.: Evaluation of NeuroPage: a new memory aid. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 63: 113-115, 1997.
  • EVANS, J. J., EMSLIE, H. and WILSON, B. A.: External cueing systems in the rehabilitation of executive impairments of action. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4: 399-408, 1998.
  • FRYER, J. and HAFFEY, W.: Cognitive rehabilitation and community readaptation: outcomes from two programme models. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2: 51-63, 1987.
  • ALDERMAN, N.: Central executive deficit and response to operant conditioning. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 6: 161-186, 1996.
  • KELLY, M. P., JOHNSON, C. T., KNOLLER, N. et al.: Substance abuse, traumatic brain injury and newropsychological outcome. Brain Injury, 11: 391-402, 1997.
  • WENDEN, F. J., CRAWFORD, S., WADE, D. T. et al.: Assault, post-traumatic amnesia and other variables related to outcome following head injury. Clinical Rehabilitation, 12: 53-63, 1998.
  • GREENWOOD, R. J.: Models of rehabilitation programmes for the brain-injured adult. I: current provision, efficacy and good pratice. Clinical Rehabilitation, 7: 248-255, 1993.
  • NOVACK, T. A. and JOHNSTONE, B.: Addressing a continuum of recovery after acquired brain injury. Journal of the international Neuropsychological Society, 4: 409, 1998.
  • MAZAUX, J. M. and RICHER, E.: Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury in adults. Disability and Rehabilitation, 20: 435-447, 1998.
  • COPE, D. N. and HALL, K.: Head injury rehabilitation: benefit of early intervention. Archives of Physical Medical Rehabilitation, 63: 433-437, 1982.
  • WOOD, R. LI., MCCREA, J. D., WOOD, L. M. et al.: Clinical and cost effectiveness of post-acute neurobehavioural rehabilitation. Brain Injury, 13: 69-88, 1999.
  • MALIA, K. and BRANNAGAN, A.: Insight Workshop course summary. Braintree Training, Cognitive Rehabilitation, Headley Court, Epsom, Surrey KT18 6JN, 1988.
  • GOGSTAD, A. C. and MALMER KJELLMAN, A.: Rehabilitation prognosis related to clinical and social factors in brain injured of different etiology. Social Science & Medicine, 10: 283-288, 1976.
  • BLACKMER, J. and MARSHALL, S. C.: A comparison of traumatic brain injury in the Saskatchewan native North American and non-native North American populations. Brain Injury. 13: 627-635, 1995.
  • PARADIS, M.: Aspects of Bilingual Aphasia (Oxford: Pergamon/Elsevier Press), 1995.
  • AGLIOTI, S. BELTRAMELLO, A., GIRARDI, F. et al.: Neurolinguistic and follow-up study of an unusual pattern of recovery from bilingual subcrotical aphasia. Brain, 119: 1551-1564, 1996.
  • BAERY, P. and CLARK, D.: Effects of intact versus non-intact families on adolescent head injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury, 6: 229-232, 1992.
  • PACE, G. M., SCHLUND, M. W., HAZARD-HAUPT, T. et al.: Characteristics and outcomes of a home and community-based neurohabilitation programme. Brain Injury, 13: 535-546, 1999.
  • GENTLEMAN, D.: The inverse square law in brain injury rehabilation: does distance matter? Poster presented at the Second World Congress on Brain Injury, Seville, 1997.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.