22
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Conceptual dilemmas in evaluating individuals with severely impaired consciousness

Pages 639-643 | Published online: 03 Jul 2009

REFERENCES

  • TEASDALE G. andJENNET B.: Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet, 2: 81–84, 1974.
  • ASPEN CONSENSUS GONFERENCEWORKGROUP ON VEGETATIVE AND MINIMALLY CONSCIOUS STATE Draft Consensus Statement (Aspen, CO: Given Biomedical Institute), 19–23 March, 1997.
  • GIACINO, J. T., KEZMARSKY, M. A., DELucA, J. et al.: Monitoring rate of recovery to predict outcome in minimally responsive patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72: 897–901, 1991.
  • HAMILTON, B., GRANGER, G. V., SHERWIN, F. S. et al.: A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: M. J. Fuhrer (ed.) Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement (Baltimore, MD: Brookes), 1987.
  • RAPPAPORT, M., HALL, K. M., HOPKINS, K. et al.: Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63: 118–123, 1982.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.