Spatial-temporal characteristics of perceptual organization following acquired brain injury

References

• Uttal W-R. On seeing forms. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J. 1988
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey DG, Kramer AF. Age-related differences in perceptual organization and selective attention: implications for display segmentation and recall performance. Experimental Aging Research 1999; 25: 1–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansdell H. Effect of extent of temporal lobe ablations on two lateralized deficits. Physiology and Behavior 1968; 3: 271–273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe F, Russell WR. Dissociated visual perceptual and spatial deficits in focal lesions of the right hemisphere. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1969; 32: 73–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layman S, Greene E. The effects of stroke on object recognition. Brain and Cognition 1988; 7: 87–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark ME, Grafman J, Fertig E. A restricted ‘spotlight’ of attention in visual object recognition. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35: 1233–1249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurylo DD, Allan WC, Collins TE, Barron J. Perceptual organization based upon spatial relationships in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Behavioural Neurology 2003; 14: 19–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore GC, Tobias TR, Royer FL. Aging and similarity grouping in visual search. Journal of Gerontology 1985; 40: 586–592
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farkas MS, Hoyer WJ. Processing consequences of perceptual grouping in selective attention. Journal of Gerontology 1980; 35: 207–216
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zahn TP, Mirsky AF. Reaction time indicators of attention deficits in closed head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1999; 21: 352–367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tromp E, Mulder T. Slowness of information processing after traumatic head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1991; 13: 821–830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1971; 49: 467–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurylo DD. Time course of perceptual grouping, Perception and Psychophysics 1997; 59: 142–147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsten G, Wasserman GS. Visual masking: mechanisms and theories. Psychological Review 1980; 88: 329–354
   Google Scholar
• Fisher DC, Ledbetter MF, Cohen NJ, Marmor D, Tulsky DS. WAIS-III and WMS-III profiles of mildly to severely brain-injured patients. Applied Neuropsychology 2000; 7: 126–132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madigan NK, Deluca J, Diamond BJ, Tramontano G, Averill A. Speed of information processing in traumatic brain injury: modality-specific factors. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2000; 15: 943–956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis DC, Kiefner MG, Fridlund AJ. Visuospatial dysfunction following unilateral brain damage: dissociations in hierarchical and hemispatial analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1991; 10: 421–431
   Google Scholar
• Lamb MR, Robertson LC, Knight RT. Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: interferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1990; 16: 471–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton VL, Donders J, Hoffman NM. Rey Complex Figure Test performance after traumatic head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2005; 27: 55–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitz AG, Conrad PM, Horn DL, Sarff PL, Majovski LV. Hooper Visual Organization Test performance in lateralized brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1992; 7: 243–250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler JD, Grace J, White DA, Butters MA, Malloy PF. Laterality differences in quantitative and qualitative Hooper Performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1996; 11: 223–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Blusewicz MJ, Preston KA. Visual hierarchical analysis of Block Design configural errors. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1991; 13: 455–465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilds MC, Boake C, Sherer M. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised Block Design broken configuration errors in nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury. Applied Neuropsychology 2000; 7: 208–214
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bringuier V, Chavane F, Glaeser L, Fregnac Y. Horizontal propagation of visual activity in the synaptic integration field of area 17 neurons. Science 1990; 283: 695–699
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert CD, Wiesel TN. Intrinsic connectivity and receptive field properties in visual cortex. Vision Research 1985; 25: 365–374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauschecker JP, von Grünau MW, Poulin C. Thalamo-cortical connections and their correlation with receptive field properties in the cat's lateral suprasylvian visual cortex. Experimental Brain Research 1987; 67: 100–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat U. Functional architecture of long-range perceptual interactions. Spatial Vision 1999; 12: 143–162
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamme VA, Supèr H, Spekreijse H. Feedforward, horizontal, and feedback processing in the visual cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1998; 8: 529–535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maylor EA, Lavie N. The influence of perceptual load on age differences in selective attention. Psychology and Aging 1998; 13: 563–573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar