Protein S-100 and neuropsychological functioning following severe traumatic brain injury

References

• Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B. Biochemical serum markers for brain damage: A short review with emphasis on clinical utility in mild head injury. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2003; 21: 171–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B, Trumpy JH. Management of minor head injury: The value of early computed tomography and serum protein measurements. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 1997; 4: 29–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B. Biochemical serum markers of traumatic brain injury. Journal of Trauma 2002; 52: 798–808
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marchi N, Fazio V, Cucullo L, Kight K, Masary KT, Barnett G, Volgelbawm M, Kinter M, Rasmussen P, Mayberg MR, Janigro D. Serum transthyretin monomer as a possible marker of blood-to-CSF barrier disruption. The Journal of Neuroscience 2003; 23: 1949–1955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fano G, Mariggio M, Angelella P, Antonica N, Fulle S, Calissano P. The S100 protein causes an increase of intracellular calcium and death of PC12 cells. Neuroscience 1993; 53: 919–925
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haglid K, Yang Q, Hamberger A, Bergman S, Widerberg A, Danielson N. S100β stimulates neurite outgrowth in the rat sciatic nerve grafted with cellular muscle transplants. Brain Research 1997; 753: 196–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selinfreund R, Bargar S, Pledger W, Van Eldik L. Neurotrophic protein S100 β stimulates glial cell proliferation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 1991; 88: 3554–3558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer DB, Cornwall EH, Landar A, Song W. The S100 protein family: History, function, and expression. Brain Research Bulletin 1995; 37: 417–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardemark HG, Persson L, Gustavsson J, Rundstrom G, Mendel Hartvig I, Esscher T, Pahlman S. S-100 protein and neuron-specific enolase: CSF markers of cell damage in the central nervous system. Upsala Journal of Medical Science 1986; 43(Suppl)29
   Google Scholar
• Raabe A, Grolms C, Keller M, Dohnert J, Sorge O, Seifert V. Correlations of computed tomography findings and serum brain damage markers following severe head injury. Acta Neurochirgia (Wien) 1998; 140: 787–792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townend WJ, Guy MJ, Pani MA, Martin B, Yates DW. Head injury outcome prediction in the emergency department: A role for protein S-100B? Journal of Neurology. Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry 2002; 73: 542–546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterloo K, Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B. Neuropsychological function in patients with increased serum levels of protein S-100 after minor head injury. Acta Neurochirgia (Wien) 1997; 139: 26–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann M, Curio N, Jost S, Grubich C, Ebert AD, Fork ML, Synowitz H. Release of biochemical markers of damage to neuronal and glial brain tissue is associated with short and long term neuropsychological outcome after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2001; 70: 95–100
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green P, Iverson GL, Allen L. Detecting malingering in head injury litigation with the Word Memory Test. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 813–819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millis SR, Volinsky CT. Assessment of response bias in mild head injury: Beyond malingering tests. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2001; 23: 809–828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittenberg W, DiGiulio DV, Perrin S, Bass AE. Symptoms following mild head injury: Expectation as aetiology. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1992; 55: 2000–2004
   Google Scholar
• Mittenberg W, Strauman S. Diagnosis of mild head injury and the postconcussion syndrome. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2000; 15: 783–791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paniak C, Reynolds S, Toller-Lobe G, Melnyk A, Nagy J, Schmidt D. A longitudinal study of the relationship between financial compensation and symptoms after treated mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2002; 24: 187–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder LM. A review of mild head trauma. Part 2: Clinical implications. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1997; 19: 432–457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uomoto JM, Fann JR. Explanatory style and perception of recovery in symptomatic mild traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 2004; 49: 334–337
   Google Scholar
• Zakzanis KK, Leach L, Kaplan E. Neuropsychological differential diagnosis. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands 1999
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale GM. Head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1995; 58: 526–539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shores EA, Marosszeky JE, Sandanam J, Batchelor J. Preliminary validation of a clinical scale for measuring the duration of post-traumatic amnesia. The Medical Journal of Australia 1986; 144: 569–572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marosszecky NEV, Ryan L, Shores EA, Batchelor J, Marosszeky JE. The PTA protocol: Guidelines for using the westmead post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) scale. Wild & Woolley, Sydney 1998
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale – revised manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio 1981
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler memory scale – revised manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio 1987
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, New York 1996
   Google Scholar
• Choca J, Laatsch L, Garside D, Arnemann C. CAT: The computer category test (Version 6.0). Multi-Health System, Toronto 1994
   Google Scholar
• Shores EA, Carstairs JR, Crawford JR. Excluded Letter Fluency Test (ELF): Norms and test–retest reliability data for healthy young adults. Brain Impairment 2006; 7: 26–32
   Google Scholar
• Miller EN. California computerized assessment package manual. Author, Los Angeles 1996
   Google Scholar
• Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression, anxiety, stress scales. 2nd ed. Psychological Foundation, Sydney 1995
   Google Scholar
• Hutcheson G, Sofroniou N. The multivariate social scientist. Sage, London 1999
   Google Scholar
• Stevens J. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 3rd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Mahwah, NJ 1996
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, 4th ed. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 2001
   Google Scholar
• Carstairs JR, Shores EA. The Macquarie University Neuropsychological Normative Study (MUNNS): Rationale and methodology. Australian Psychologist 2000; 35: 36–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakzanis KK. Statistics to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: Formulae, illustrative numerical examples, and heuristic interpretation of effect size analyses for neuropsychological researchers. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2001; 16: 653–657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanks RA, Ricker JH, Millis SR. Empirical evidence regarding the neuropsychological assessment of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. Differential diagnosis in adult neuropsychological assessment, JH Ricker. Springer, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Hermann M, Curio N, Jost S, Wunderlich MT, Synowitz H, Wallesch CW. Protein S-100B and neuron specific enolase as early neurobiochemical markers of severity of traumatic brain injury. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1999; 14: 109–114
   Google Scholar
• Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B, Marup-Jensen S, et al. The clinical value of serum S-100 protein measurements in minor head injury: A Scandinavian multicentre study. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 1047–1055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raabe A, Grolms C, Seifert V. Serum markers of brain damage and outcome prediction in patients after severe head injury. British Journal of Neurosurgery 1999; 13: 56–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan J, Burgess P, Emslie H. Fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia 1995; 33: 261–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson JTE. Clinical and neuropsychological aspects of closed head injury. Taylor & Francis, London 1990
   Google Scholar
• Swan N. New imaging technology confirms earlier PET scan evidence: Methamphetamine abuse linked to human brain damage. National Institute on Drug Abuse 2003; 18: 1–4
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez R, Heaton RK, Moore DJ, Letendre S, Ellis RJ, Wolfson T, Marcolte T, Cherner M, Rippeth J, Grant I, the HNRC Group. Computerized reaction time battery versus a traditional neuropsychological battery: Detecting HIV-related impairments. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2003; 9: 64–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella G. Assessment of attention following traumatic brain injury: A review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1998; 8: 351–375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Kinsella G. Attentional deficits following closed-head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1992; 14: 822–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan F, Baguley IJ, Cameron ID. Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. The Medical Journal of Australia 2003; 178: 290–295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felmingham KL, Baguley IJ, Green AM. Effects of diffuse axonal injury on speed of information processing following severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 2004; 18: 564–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias JL, Bigler ED, Jones NR, Bowden SC, Barrett-Woodbridge M, Brown GC, Taylor DJ. Neuropsychological and information processing performance and its relationship to white matter changes following moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study. Applied Neuropsychology 2004; 11: 134–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiscock M, Inch R, Gleason A. Raven's Progressive Matrices performance in adults with traumatic brain injury. Applied Neuropsychology 2002; 9: 129–138
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Boussard CN, Fredman P, Lundin A, Andersson K, Edman G, Borg J. S100 in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 671–683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar