The effect of context on communication: A study of the language and communication skills of adults with acquired brain injury

References

• Jordan F, Ozanne A, Murdoch B. Long-term speech and language disorders subsequent to closed head injury in children. Brain Injury 1988; 2: 179–185
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galski T, Tompkins C, Johnston MV. Competence in discourse as a measure of social integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 769–782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Cognitive rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach. The Guilford Press, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Sarno MT. The nature of verbal impairment after closed head injury. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1980; 168: 685–692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MRT, Deruyter F. Cognitive and language bases for communication disorders. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury: Management of cognitive, language and motor impairments, FR Beukelman, KM Yorkson. Pro-Ed, Austin 1991; 124–190
   Google Scholar
• McDonald S. Communication disorders following closed head injury: New approaches to assessment and rehabilitation. Brain Injury 1992; 6: 283–292
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ylvisaker M. Communication outcome in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1993; 3: 367–387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho C, Deruyter F, Stein M. Treatment efficacy: Cognitive-communicative disorders resulting from traumatic brain injury in adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1996; 35: S5–S17
   Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: A follow-up study. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 911–935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland D, Miller N. Conversation analysis of communication break-down after closed brain injury. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 1–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGann W, Werven G. Social competence and head injury: A new emphasis. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 93–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S. Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain and Language 1993; 44: 28–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riches V. Everyday social interaction: A program for people with disabilities, 2nd. Maclennan and Petty Pty Ltd, Sydney 1996
   Google Scholar
• Lund NJ, Duchan JF. Assessing children's language in naturalistic contexts, 3rd. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1993
   Google Scholar
• Rees RJ. Interrupted lives: Rehabilitation and learning following brain injury. IP Communications, Melbourne 2005
   Google Scholar
• Siegel-Causey E, Guess D. Enhancing nonsymbolic communication interactions among learners with severe disabilities. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1989
   Google Scholar
• Downing JE, Demchak MA. Determining individuals’ abilities and how to support students. Including students with severe and multiple disabilities in typical classrooms: Practical strategies for teachers, JE Downing. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore 1996; 35–61
   Google Scholar
• Devito JA. The interpersonal communication book, 10th. Pearson Education Inc., Sydney 2004
   Google Scholar
• Lezak M, O’Brien K. Chronic emotional, social and physical changes after traumatic brain injury. Traumatic brain injury: Mechanisms of damage, assessment, intervention and outcome, E Bigler. Pro-Ed, Austin 1990; 635–680
   Google Scholar
• Zenicus AH, Wesolowski MD. Is the social network analysis necessary in the rehabilitation of individuals with head injury?. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 723–727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellon ML. Management of posttraumatic epilepsy in people with brain injury: A psychoeducational perspective. Flinders University, Doctoral Dissertation 2005
   Google Scholar
• Johansen RK. Listening in the silence, seeing in the dark: Reconstructing life after brain injury. University of California Press, Berkeley 2002
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone T, Scherer KR. Vocal communication of emotion. Handbook of emotions, 2nd, M Lewis, JM Haviland-Jones. The Guilford Press, New York 2000; 220–235
   Google Scholar
• Eslinger PJ, Geder L. Behavioural and emotional changes after focal frontal lobe damage. Behavior and mood disorders in focal brain lesions, J Bogousslavsky, JL Cummings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000; 217–260
   Google Scholar
• Scherer KR. Vocal affect signalling: A comparative approach. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 1985; 15: 189–238
   Google Scholar
• Scherer KR. Universality of emotional expression. Encyclopedia of human emotions, D Levinson, J Ponzetti, P Jorgenson. Macmillan, New York 1999; 669–674
   Google Scholar
• Chittum W, Johnson K, Chittum J, Guercio J, McMorrow M. Road to awareness: An individualized training package for increasing knowledge and comprehension of personal deficits in persons with acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 763–776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy M, Garner J. Neuropsychological rehabilitation: Recovery from head injury. Spectrum Publications Pty Ltd., Melbourne 1988
   Google Scholar
• Yates PJ. Psychological adjustment, social enablement and community integration following acquired brain injury. Neurophysical Rehabilitation 2003; 12: 291–302
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Dahlberg MA, Malec JF. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005; 86: 1681–1692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan D. Language and the brain. Handbook of psycholinguistics, MA Gernsbacker. Academic Press, San Diego 1994; 1023–1053
   Google Scholar
• Chambles DL, Hollon SD. Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1998; 66: 7–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziiano AM, Raulin ML. Research methods: A process of inquiry, 5th. Pearson Education Group Inc., Sydney 2004
   Google Scholar
• Crawford JK, Allen KM. National adult reading test—revised (NART-R). Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St. Edmunds, UK 1993
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale—revised (WAIS-R). They Psychological Corporation, New York 1981
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs HE. Yes, behaviour analysis can help, but do you know how to harness it?. Brain Injury 1988; 2: 339–346
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Praag H, Kemperman G, Gage FH. Neural consequences of environmental enrichment. National Review of Neuroscience 2000; 1: 191–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans JJ, Wilson BA, Schuwi U, Andrade J, Baddeley A, Bruna O, Canavan T, Della Sala S, Green R, Laaksonen R, Lorenzi L, Taussik I. A comparison of ‘errorless’ and ‘trial-and-error’ learning methods for teaching individuals with acquired memory deficits. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2000; 10: 67–101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin G, Pear J. Behaviour modification: What it is and how to do it, 7th. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 2002
   Google Scholar
• Tailby R, Haslam C. An investigation of errorless learning in memory-impaired patients: Improving the technique and clarifying theory. Neuropsychologia 2003; 41: 1230–1240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James S. Assessing children with language disorders. Language and communication disorders in children, 3rd, DK Bernstein, E Tiegerman. Macmillan, New York 1993; 185–228
   Google Scholar
• Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Alta Mira Press, London 1994
   Google Scholar
• Orford J. Community psychology: Theory and practice. John Wiley, Chichester 1996
   Google Scholar
• Rees RJ. Rewriting the script: Demonstrating skills and talents of people with brain injury. Institute for the Study of Learning Difficulties, Adelaide 1999
   Google Scholar
• Moore A, Stanbrook M. Cognitive moderators of outcome following traumatic brain injury: A conceptual model and implications for rehabilitation. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 109–130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford S. Resilience in older age. InPsych 2005; 27: 16–19
   Google Scholar
• Pence AR. Ecological research with children and families: From concepts to methodology. Teachers College Press, New York 1988
   Google Scholar
• Masten A, Best K. Garmezy N. Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. evelopment and Psychopathology 1990; 2: 425–444
   Google Scholar
• Gore S, Eckenrode J. Context and process in research on risk and resilience. Stress, risk and resilience in children and adolescents: Processes, mechanisms and interventions, R Haggerty, L Sherrod, N Garmezy, M Rutter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996; 19–63
   Google Scholar
• Tyerman A. Social bases of community rehabilitation: A review. Community Rehabilitation Following Acquired Brain Injury 1997; 1: 29––46
   Google Scholar
• Schumaker J, Ellis E. Social skills training of learning disabled adults: A generalization study. Learning Disability Quarterly 1982; 5: 409––414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar