Does intensive rehabilitation improve the functional outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI)? A randomized controlled trial

References

• Aronow HU. Rehabilitation effectiveness with severe brain injury: translating research into policy. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1987; 2: 24–36
   Google Scholar
• Cope DN. The effectiveness of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A review. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 649–670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes M, Eames P, Evans C, Iannotti F, Jessop E, McLellan L, Pentland B, Wilson B. Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury (A working party report of the British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine). London 1998, July (Further information and copies of this report can be obtained from: The British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine, c/o The Royal College of Physicians, 11st Andrews Place, Regents Park, London NWI 4LE)
   Google Scholar
• NIH consensus development panel on rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury: Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. JAMA 1999; 282: 974–981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice-Oxley M, Turner-Stokes L. Effectiveness of brain injury rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 1999; 13: 7–24, (suppl 1)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesnut RM, Carney N, Maynard H, Mann NC, Patterson P, Helfand M. Summary report: Evidence for the effectiveness of rehabilitation for persons with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1999; 14: 176–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope DN, Hall K. Head injury rehabilitation: Benefit of early intervention. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1982; 63: 433–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP. Rehabilitation intervention after traumatic brain injury. BNI Quarterly 1988; 4: 30–37
   Google Scholar
• Blackerby WF. Intensity of rehabilitation and length of stay. Brain Injury 1990; 4: 167–173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spivack G, Spettell CM, Ellis DW, Ross SE. Effect of intensive treatment and length of stay on rehabilitation outcome. Brain Injury 1992; 6: 419–434
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans CD. Rehabilitation of traumatic brain injury. Neurological rehabilitation2nd, LS Illis. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford 1994
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington H, Earlam RJ. Rehabilitation after injury and the need for coordination. Injury 1994; 25: 527–531
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heinemann A, Hamilton B, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Granger C. Functional status and therapeutic intensity during inpatient rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1995; 74: 315–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cifu DX, Kreutzer JS, Kolakowsky-Hayne SA, Marwitz JH, Englander J. The relationship between therapy intensity and rehabilitation outcome after traumatic brain injury: A multicenter analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 1441–1448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiel A, Burn JPS, Henry D, Clark J, McClellan DL, Wilson BA, Burnett ME. The effect of increased rehabilitation therapy after brain injury: Results of a prospective controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 2001; 15: 501–514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade A, Tennant A, Chamberlain MA. A randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of intensity of therapy upon length of stay in a neurological rehabilitation setting. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002; 34: 260–266
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Disler PB, Nair A, Wade DT. Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD004170
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagemaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effect of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke: A research synthesis. Stroke 1997; 28: 1550–1556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Dauphine SW, Richards C, Ashburn A, Miller K, Lincoln N, Partridge C, Wellwood I, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: A meta-analysis. Stroke 2004; 35: 2529–2536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Peppen R, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, Van der Wees PJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: What's the evidence?. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004; 18: 833–862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu XL, Poon WS, Chan C, Chan S. Does intensive rehabilitation improve the functional outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI)? Interim result of a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Neurosurgery 2001; 15: 464–473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielezny M, Tashman JS. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. Rehabilitation outcomes: Analysis and measurement, JM Fuhrer. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co, Baltimore, MD 1987; 137–147
   Google Scholar
• Jennett B. Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: A practical scale. The Lancet 1975; 1: 480–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Northern California Neurobehavioral Group. Manual for Cognsitat (The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination). The Northern California Neurobehavioral Group, Inc., Fairfax, CA 1995
   Google Scholar
• Chan CCH, Lee TMC, Wong V, Fong K, Lee C. Validation of Chinese version Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (NCSE). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1999; 14: 71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong KNK, Chan CCH, Au DKS. Relationship of motor and cognitive abilities to functional performance in stroke rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 443–453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan CCH, Lee TMC, Fong KK, Lee C, Wong V. Cognistat profile for Chinese patient with stroke. Brain Injury 2002; 16: 873–884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennett B, Teasdale G, Braakman R, Minderhoud J, Heiden J, Kurze T. Prognosis of patients with severe brain injury. Neurosurgery 1979; 4: 283–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garraway WM, Akhtar AJ, Hockey L, Prescott RJ. Management of acute stroke in the elderly: Follow-up of a controlled trial. BMJ 1980; 281: 827–829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garraway WM, Akhtar AJ, Prescott RJ, Hockey L. Management of acute stroke in the elderly: Preliminary result of a controlled trial. BMJ 1980; 280: 1040–1043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau AEC. Prediction of discharge status of the brain injury persons in Hong Kong (Abstract of Theses and Dissertations). Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy 1998; 9: 52
   Google Scholar
• Lee CMS. Program evaluation of sub-acute stroke rehabilitation program (Abstract of Theses and Dissertations). Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy 1998; 9: 52
   Google Scholar
• Hall KM, Johnston MV. Outcomes evaluation in TBI rehabilitation. Part II: Measurement tools for a nationwide data system. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 75: SC10–SC18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley CA, Taylor R, Hellawell DJ, Pentland B. Use of the functional assessment measure (FIM+FAM) in head injury rehabilitation: A psychometric analysis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 1999; 67: 749–754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Nyein K, Turner-Stokes T, Gatehouse C. The UK FIM+FAM: Development and evaluation. Clinical Rehabilitation 1999; 13: 277–287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurka JA, Felmingham KL, Baguley IJ, Schotte DE, Crooks J, Marosszeky JE. Utility of the functional assessment measure after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1999; 14: 247–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doninger NA, Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Ambrose C. Rating scale analysis of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2000; 15: 683–695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oehlert ME, Hass SD, Freeman MR, Williams MD, Ryan JJ, Sumerall SW. The neurobehavioral cognitive status examination: Accuracy of the ‘screen-metric’ approach in a clinical sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1997; 53: 733–737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrushina M, Abara J, Blumenfeld A. The neurobehavioral cognitive status examination as a screening tool for organicity in psychiatric patients. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1994; 45: 252–256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morton MV, Wehman P. Psychosocial and emotional sequelae of individuals with traumatic brain injury: A literature review and recommendations. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 81–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cifu DX, Keyser-Marcus L, Lopez E, Wehman P, Kreutzer JS, Englander J, High W. Acute predicators of successful return to work 1 year after traumatic brain injury: A multicenter analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1997; 78: 125–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• William HB, Wesolowski MD, Guth ML. Comprehensive head injury rehabilitation: An outcome evaluation. Brain Injury 1988; 2: 313–322
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mooney GF. Relative contributions of neurophysical, cognitive, and personality changes to disability after brain injury. Cognitive Rehabilitation 1988; 6: 14–20
   Google Scholar
• Kunishio K, Matsumoto Y, Kawada S, Miyoshi Y, Matsuhisa T, Moriyama E, Norikane H, Tanaka R. Neuropsychological outcome and social recovery of head injury patients. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica 1993; 33: 824–829
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marshall LF, Marshell SB, Clauber MR, van Berkum-Clark M, Eisenberg HM, Luerssen TG, Marmarou A, Foulkes MA. A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. Journal of Neurosurgery 1991; 75: S14–S20, Suppl
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar