Attributions for behaviours of persons with brain injury: The role of perceived severity and time since injury

References

• Gerstenbrand F, Stepan CH. Mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 95–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift TL, Wilson SL. Misconceptions about brain injury among the general public and non-expert health professionals: An exploratory study. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 149–165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagnan D, Cairns M. Staff attributions of responsibility for challenging behaviour of adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2005; 49: 95–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure J, Devlin ME, McDowall J, Wade K. Visible markers of brain injury influence attributions for adolescents’ behaviour. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 1029–1035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouvier WD, Prestholdt PH, Warner MS. A survey of common misconceptions about head injury and recovery. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1988; 3: 331–343
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guilmette TJ, Paglia MF. The public's misconceptions about traumatic brain injury: A follow up survey. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2004; 19: 183–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer B, Johnson WE, Rempal RG, Linn RA. A note concerning misconceptions of the general public about brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1993; 8: 461–465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer JE, Johnson-Gerard M. Misconceptions about traumatic brain injury among educators and rehabilitation staff: A comparative study. Rehabilitation Psychology 1997; 42: 273–286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn CL. Over my head: A doctor's own story of head injury from the inside looking out. Andrews McMeel Publishing, Kansas City, Missouri 1998
   Google Scholar
• Frable DES. Dimensions of marginality: Distinctions among those who are different. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1993; 19: 370–380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan JR, Barry JR. Personality determinants in attitudes toward visible disability. Journal of Personality 1970; 38: 1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouvier WD, Steiner DD, Jackson WT, Schlater D, Rain JS. Employment discrimination against handicapped job candidates: An analog study of the effects of neurological causation, visibility of handicap, and public contact. Rehabilitation Psychology 1991; 36: 121–182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martz E. Invisibility of disability and work experience as predictors of employment among community college students with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 2003; 18: 153–161
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg RT. Adjustment of children with invisible and visible handicaps: Congenital heart disease and facial burns. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1974; 21: 428–432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam SF, Chan MH, Lam HW, Lam LH. Comparing the self-concepts of Hong Kong Chinese adults with visible and not visible physical disability. The Journal of Psychology 2003; 137: 363–372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livneh H, Martz E, Wilson LM. Denial and perceived visibility as predictors of adaptation to disability among college students. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 2001; 16: 227–234
   Google Scholar
• Matthews CK, Harrington NG. Invisible disability. Handbook of communication and people with disabilities: Research and application, DO Braithwaite, TL Thompson. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 2000; 405–421
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee D, Reis JP, Heller W. Women living with traumatic brain injury: Social isolation, emotional functioning and implications for psychotherapy. Women with visible and invisible disabilities, ME Banks, E Kaschak. The Haworth Press, New York 2003; 3–26
   Google Scholar
• McClure J. Social psychological factors affecting persons with brain injury: A conceptual review. University of Wellington, Victoria 2005
   Google Scholar
• Summerfield C. I was assaulted by a complete stranger while I was talking to a friend in the street. The Everest within: Life with brain injury, J Phillips. Clarity Publishing, Auckland 2000; 11–14
   Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and bias. Science 1974; 185: 1124–1131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Kenny DA, Taylor SE. Structural models for the mediation of salience effects on attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1982; 18: 105–127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins RW, Mendelsohn GA, Connell JB, Kwan VSY. Do people agree about the causes of behaviour? A social relations analysis of behavior, ratings, and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004; 86: 334–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks G, Miller N. Ten years of research on the false consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 1987; 102: 72–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure J. Discounting the causes of behavior: Are two reasons better than one?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998; 74: 7–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings RP, Remington B, Hopper GM. Experienced and inexperienced health care workers’ beliefs about challenging behaviours. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 1995; 39: 474–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose D, Rose J. Staff in services for people with intellectual disabilities: The impact of stress on attributions of challenging behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2005; 49: 827–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigel L, Langdon PE, Collins S, O’Brien Y. Challenging behaviour and learning disabilities: The relationship between expressed emotion and staff attributions. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 2006; 45: 205–216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley B, Standen PJ. Carers’ attributions for challenging behaviour. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 2000; 39: 157–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilmette TJ, Temple RO, Kennedy ML, Weiler MD, Ruffolo LF, Dufresne E. The influence of victim characteristics on potential jurors’ perceptions of brain damage in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 1027–1030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott J, McClure J. How normality information shapes attributions for the actions of persons with traumatic brain injury. University of Wellington, Victoria 2007, manuscript under review
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse R, Chamberlain P. Dementia in people with learning disability: A preliminary study into care staff knowledge and attributions. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 2000; 28: 148–153
   Google Scholar
• Howes H, Edwards S, Benton D. Male body image following acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 135–147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes H, Edwards S, Benton D. Female body image following acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 403–415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hux K, Schram CD, Goeken T. Misconceptions about brain injury: A survey replication. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 547–553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnhall O, Smith KA. Reactions to persons with disabilities: Personal contact versus viewing of specific media portrayals. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 1999; 76: 659–672
   Google Scholar
• Caspermayer JJ, Sylvester EJ, Drazkjoowski JF, Watson GL, Sirven JI. Evaluation of stigmatizing language and medical errors to neurology coverage by US Newspapers. 2006; 81: 300–306, Mayo Clinic Proceedings
   Google Scholar
• Owen AM, Coleman MR, Boly M, Davis MH, Laureys S, Pickard JD. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science 2006; 313: 1402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ian Sample. For first time, doctors communicate with patients in persistent vegetative state. The Guardian. 8 September, 2006
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Hanks R, Johnson-Greene D. Perspectives on rehabilitation of individuals with cognitive impairment after brain injury: Rationale for reconsideration of theoretical paradigms. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2002; 17: 191–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart K, Faust D. Prediction of the effects of mild head injury: A message about the Kennard principle. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1988; 44: 780–782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar