Transcranial direct current stimulation and suppression of contralesional primary motor cortex post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, De Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e146–e603. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilbert JJ. The world health report 2002 – reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2003;16:230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feigin VL, Lawes CMM, Bennett DA, Anderson CS. Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:43–53. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00266-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris JE, Eng JJ. Individuals with the dominant hand affected following stroke demonstrate less impairment than those with the nondominant hand affected. Neurorehabil Neural Re. 2006;20:380–89. doi:10.1177/1545968305284528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak DA, Grefkes C, Ameli M, Fink GR. Interhemispheric competition after stroke: brain stimulation to enhance recovery of function of the affected hand. Neurorehabil Neural Re. 2009;23:641–56. doi:10.1177/1545968309336661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Suresh AK, Li X, Rymer WZ, Suresh NL. Impaired motor unit control in paretic muscle post stroke assessed using surface electromyography: a preliminary report. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:4116–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suresh N, Li X, Zhou P, Rymer WZ. Examination of motor unit control properties in stroke survivors using surface EMG decomposition: a preliminary report. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:8243–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carey JR, Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, Dorsey L, Rundquist P, Ugurbil K. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain. 2002;125:773–88. doi:10.1093/brain/awf091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers JJ, Kang N, Cauraugh JH. Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance cognitive and motor functions in the ageing brain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;25:42–54. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2015.11.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Berker AO, Bikson M, Bestmann S. Predicting the behavioral impact of transcranial direct current stimulation: issues and limitations. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:613. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang N, Summers JJ, Cauraugh JH. Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:345–55. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2015-311242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Fregni F. Transcranial direct current stimulation - an adjuvant tool for the treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases? Curr Psychiatry Rev. 2007;3:222–32. doi:10.2174/157340007781369649.
   Google Scholar
• Bindman LJ, Lippold OC, Redfearn JW. The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long-lasting after-effects. J Physiol. 1964;172:369–82. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartside IB. Mechanisms of sustained increases of firing rate of neurons in the rat cerebral cortex after polarization: reverberating circuits or modification of synaptic conductance? Nature. 1968;220:382–83. doi:10.1038/220382a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527:633–39. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001;57:1899–901. doi:10.1212/WNL.57.10.1899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:400–09. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1531-8249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buetefisch CM. Role of the contralesional hemisphere in post-stroke recovery of upper extremity motor function. Front Neurol. 2015;6:214. doi:10.3389/fneur.2015.00214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradnam LV, Stinear CM, Barber PA, Byblow WD. Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22:2662–71. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Pino G, Pellegrino G, Assenza G, Capone F, Ferreri F, Formica D, Ranieri F, Tombini M, Ziemann U, Rothwell JC, et al. Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10:597–608. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu DY, Qian L, Zorowitz RD, Zhang L, Qu YP, Yuan Y. Effects on decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomized sham-controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.07.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehme AK, Eickhoff SB, Rottschy C, Fink GR, Grefkes C. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of motor-related neural activity after stroke. Neuroimage. 2012;59:2771–82. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaillard A, Martin CD, Garambois K, Lebas JF, Hommel M. Vicarious function within the human primary motor cortex? Brain. 2005;128:1122–38. doi:10.1093/brain/awh456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au-Yeung SS, Wang J, Chen Y, Chua E. Transcranial direct current stimulation to primary motor area improves hand dexterity and selective attention in chronic stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93:1057–64. doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000000127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neuros. 2007;25:123–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming MK, Rothwell JC, Sztriha L, Teo JT, Newham DJ. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor sequence learning and upper limb function after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128:1389–98. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.03.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, Wagner T, Ferreira MJL, Lima MC, Rigonatti SP, Marcolin MA, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport. 2005;16:1551–55. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000177010.44602.5e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusco A, De Angelis D, Morone G, Maglione L, Paolucci T, Bragoni M, Venturiero V. The ABC of tDCS: effects of anodal, bilateral and cathodal montages of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with stroke-a pilot study. Stroke Res Treat. 2013;2013:837595.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fusco A, Assenza F, Iosa M, Izzo S, Altavilla R, Paolucci S, Vernieri F. The ineffective role of cathodal tDCS in enhancing the functional motor outcomes in early phase of stroke rehabilitation: an experimental trial. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–9. doi:10.1155/2014/547290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Waldner A, Mehrholz J, Tomelleri C, Pohl M, Werner C. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: an exploratory, randomized multicenter trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:838–46. doi:10.1177/1545968311413906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedr EM, Shawky OA, El-Hammady DH, Rothwell JC, Darwish ES, Mostafa OM, Tohamy AM. Effect of anodal versus cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27:592–601. doi:10.1177/1545968313484808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DY, Lim JY, Kang EK, You DS, Oh MK, Oh BM, Paik NJ. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89:879–86. doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181f70aa7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquez JL, Conley AC, Karayanidis F, Miller J, Lagopoulos J, Parsons MW. Determining the benefits of transcranial direct current stimulation on functional upper limb movement in chronic stroke. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017;40:138–45. doi:10.1097/MRR.0000000000000220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair DG, Renga V, Lindenberg R, Zhu L, Schlaug G. Optimizing recovery potential through simultaneous occupational therapy and non-invasive brain-stimulation using tDCS. Restor Neurol Neuros. 2011;29:411–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha S, Silva E, Foerster A, Wiesiolek C, Chagas AP, Machado G, Baltar A, Monte-Silva K. The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper limb function in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:653–60. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1055382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg CJ, Bachtiar V, O’Shea J, Allman C, Bosnell RA, Kischka U, Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H. Cortical activation changes underlying stimulation-induced behavioural gains in chronic stroke. Brain. 2012;135:276–84. doi:10.1093/brain/awr313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao J, Drogos J, Veltink F, Anderson C, Zaa JCU, Hanson LI, Dewald JPA. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the expression of the flexor synergy in the paretic arm in chronic stroke is dependent on shoulder abduction loading. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimerman M, Heise KF, Hoppe J, Cohen LG, Gerloff C, Hummel FC. Modulation of training by single-session transcranial direct current stimulation to the intact motor cortex enhances motor skill acquisition of the paretic hand. Stroke. 2012;43:2185–91. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blobaum P. Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94:477–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–101. doi:10.2307/2533446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein M, Higgins JP. Meta-analysis and subgroups. Prev Sci. 2013;14:134–43. doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0377-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. New York (NY): Wiley; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Foley NC, Teasell RW, Bhogal SK, Speechley MR. Stroke rehabilitation evidence-based review: methodology. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bastani A, Jaberzadeh S. Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhance excitability of the motor cortex and motor function in healthy individuals and subjects with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123:644–57. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2011.08.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58. doi:10.1002/sim.1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel FC, Ceinik P, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F, Byblow WD, Buetefisch CM, Rothwell J, Cohen LG, Gertoff C. Controversy: noninvasive and invasive cortical stimulation show efficacy in treating stroke patients. Brain Stimul. 2008;1:370–82. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butefisch CM, Netz J, Wessling M, Seitz RJ, Homberg V. Remote changes in cortical excitability after stroke. Brain. 2003;126:470–81. doi:10.1093/brain/awg044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar