The Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire score is associated with disability and self-reported recovery six months after mild traumatic brain injury in older adults

References

• Bazarian JJ, McClung J, Cheng YT, Flesher W, Schneider SM. Emergency department management of mild traumatic brain injury in the USA. Emerg Med J. 2005;22(7):473–77. doi:10.1136/emj.2004.019273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belanger HG, Curtiss G, Demery JA, Lebowitz BK, Vanderploeg RD. Factors moderating neuropsychological outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005 May 1;11(3):215–27. doi: 10.1017/S1355617705050277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla D, Devi BI. Mild traumatic brain injuries in adults. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2010 Jul;1(2):82. doi:10.4103/0976-3147.71723.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Peloso P, Borg J, Von Holst H, Holm L, Kraus J, Coronado V. Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004 Feb 1;36:28–60. doi: 10.1080/16501960410023732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll L, Cassidy JD, Peloso P, Borg J, Von Holst H, Holm L, Paniak C, Pépin M. Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004 Feb 1;36:84–105. doi: 10.1080/16501960410023859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancelliere C, Cassidy JD, Côté P, Hincapié CA, Hartvigsen J, Carroll LJ, Marras C, Boyle E, Kristman V, Hung R, et al. Protocol for a systematic review of prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury: an update of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force findings. Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 23;1(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Author 1, Borg J, AK G, LR S, Cancelliere C, Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Nygren-de BC, Hartvigsen J, Abara U, et al. Methodological issues and research recommendations for prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar 31;95(3):S265–77. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.026.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldstein FC, Levin HS, Goldman WP, Clark AN, Altonen TK. Cognitive and neurobehavioral functioning after mild versus moderate traumatic brain injury in older adults. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001 Mar 1;7(3):373–83. doi: 10.1017/S1355617701733115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan J, Cancelliere C, Cassidy JD. Summary of the findings of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis. Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 Nov 4;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12998-014-0038-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eyres S, Carey A, Gilworth G, Neumann V, Tennant A. Construct validity and reliability of the Rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire. Clin Rehabil. 2005 Aug 1;19(8):878–87. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr905oa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Custer A, Sufrinko A, Elbin RJ, Covassin T, Collins M, Kontos A. High baseline postconcussion symptom scores and concussion outcomes in athletes. J Athl Train. 2016 Feb;51(2):136–41. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-51.2.12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson LD, Tarima S, LaRoche AA, Hammeke TA, Barr WB, Guskiewicz K, Randolph C, McCrea MA. Preinjury somatization symptoms contribute to clinical recovery after sport-related concussion. Neurology. 2016 May 17;86(20):1856–63. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papa L, Mendes ME, Braga CF. Mild traumatic brain injury among the geriatric population. Curr Transl Geriatr Exp Gerontol Rep. 2012 Sep 1;1(3):135–42. doi: 10.1007/s13670-012-0019-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Holm L, Cancelliere C, Côté P, Borg J. Introduction to the findings of the international collaboration on mild traumatic brain injury prognosis: what is a prognostic study? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar 31;95(3):S95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.026.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kristman VL, Brison M, Bédard FJ, Reguly P, Chisholm S. Prognostic markers for poor recovery after mild traumatic brain injury in older adults: A pilot cohort study. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2016 Mar.
   Google Scholar
• King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NE, Wade DT. The Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol. 1995 Sep 1;242(9):587–92. doi: 10.1007/BF00868811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lannsjö M, Borg J, Björklund G, Af Geijerstam JL, Lundgren-Nilsson Å. Internal construct validity of the rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Nov 5;43(11):997–1002. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Seemiller L, Fow NR, Kant R, Franzen MD. Presence of post-concussion syndrome symptoms in patients with chronic pain vs mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2003 Jan 1;17(3):199–206. doi: 10.1080/0269905021000030823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter S, Leigh E, Wade D, Fleminger S. The rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire. J Neurol. 2006 Dec 1;253(12):1603–14. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0275-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lannsjö M, Backheden M, Johansson U, Af Geijerstam JL, Borg J. Does head CT scan pathology predict outcome after mild traumatic brain injury? Eur J Neurol. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):124–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03813.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MR, Brooks N. Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Res. 1981 Apr 1;44(4):285–93. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.44.4.285.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson JL, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended glasgow outcome scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998 Aug;15(8):573–85. doi:10.1089/neu.1998.15.573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Res. 2000 Aug 1;69(2):204–09. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.69.2.204.
   Google Scholar
• Maas AI, Braakman R, Schouten HJ, Minderhoud JM, van Zomeren AH. Agreement between physicians on assessment of outcome following severe head injury. J Neurosurg. 1983 Mar;58(3):321–25. doi:10.3171/jns.1983.58.3.0321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks DN, Hosie J, Bond MR, Jennett B, Aughton M. Cognitive sequelae of severe head injury in relation to the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Res. 1986 May 1;49(5):549–53. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.49.5.549.
   Google Scholar
• Levin HS, Boake C, Song J, McCauley S, Contant C, Diaz-Marchan P, Brundage S, Goodman H, Kotrla KJ. Validity and sensitivity to change of the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2001 Jun 1;18(6):575–84. doi: 10.1089/089771501750291819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT, King NS, Wenden FJ, Crawford S, Caldwell FE. Routine follow up after head injury: a second randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Res. 1998 Aug 1;65(2):177–83.
   Google Scholar
• Jr JE W, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar 1;34(3):220–33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, Brazier JE, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov 30;51(11):1171–78. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00109-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit T, Livingston G, Manela M, Kitchen G, Katona C, Bowling A. Validation and normative data of health status measures in older people: the Islington study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001 Nov 1;16(11):1061–70. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer D, Stewart AL, Bloch DA, Lorig K, Laurent D, Holman H. Capturing the patient’s view of change as a clinical outcome measure. Jama. 1999 Sep 22;282(12):1157–62. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.12.1157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umegaki Y, Todo N. Psychometric properties of the Japanese CES–D, SDS, and PHQ–9 depression scales in university students. Psychol Assess. 2017 Mar;29(3):354. doi:10.1037/pas0000351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zich JM, Attkisson CC, Greenfield TK. Screening for depression in primary care clinics: the CES-D and the BDI. Int J Psych Med. 1990;20(3):259–77. doi:10.2190/LYKR-7VHP-YJEM-MKM2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton WW, Smith C, Ybarra M, Muntaner C, Tien A. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: review and revision (CESD and CESD-R). In: Maruish ME, editor. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment. Vol. 3. 3rd ed. Instruments for Adults. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 2004. p. 363–77.
   Google Scholar
• Orme JG, Reis J, Herz EJ. Factorial and discriminant validity of the center for epidemiological studies depression (CES? D) scale. J Clin Psychol. 1986 Jan 1;42(1):28–33. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198601)42:1<28::AID-JCLP2270420104>3.0.CO;2-T.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman MM, Sholomskas D, Pottenger M, Prusoff BA, Locke BZ. Assessing depressive symptoms in five psychiatric populations: a validation study. Am J Epidemiol. 1977 Sep 1;106(3):203–14. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Localio AR, Margolis DJ, Berlin JA. Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Sep 1;60(9):874–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplain S, Blancho S, Marque S, Montreuil M, Aghakhani N. Early detection of poor outcome after mild traumatic brain injury: predictive factors using a multidimensional approach a pilot study. Front Neurol. 2017 12;Dec(8):666. doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mood Disorders Society of Canada. 2010. [accessed 2018 Aug 27]. https://mdsc.ca/documents/Consumer%20and%20Family%20Support/Depression%20in%20Elderly%20edited%20Dec16%202010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wijenberg ML, Stapert SZ, Verbunt JA, Ponsford JL, Van Heugten CM. Does the fear avoidance model explain persistent symptoms after traumatic brain injury? Brain Inj. 2017 Oct 15;31(12):1597–604. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2017.1366551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar