914
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Cognitive-communication skills and acute outcome following mild traumatic brain injury

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1472-1479 | Received 04 Nov 2019, Accepted 25 Jul 2020, Published online: 28 Aug 2020

References

  • Arciniegas DB, Wortzel HS.Emotional and behavioral dyscontrol after traumatic brain injury. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2014;37(1):31–53. doi:10.1016/j.psc.2013.12.001.
  • Ponsford JL, Downing MG, Olve J, Ponsford M, Acher R, Carty M, Spit G.Longitudinal follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury: outcome at two, five, and ten years post-injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(1):64–77. doi:10.1089/neu.2013.2997.
  • Steel J, Ferguson A, Spencer E, Togher L.Language and cognitive communication during post-traumatic amnesia: A critical synthesis. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37(2):221–34. doi:10.3233/NRE-151255.
  • Ylvisaker M, Szekeres SF, Feeney T. Communication disorders associated with traumatic brain injury. In: Chapey R editor. Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia 5th ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins; 2008. p. 879–962.
  • Hammond FM, Grattan KD, Sasser H, Corrigan JD, Rosenthal M, Bushnik T, Shull W. Five years after traumatic brain injury: A study of individual outcomes and predictors of change in function. NeuroRehabilitation. 2004;19:25–35. doi:10.3233/NRE-2004-19104.
  • Lange RT, Iverson GL, Franzen MD.Neuropsychological functioning following complicated vs. uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2009;23(2):83–91. doi:10.1080/02699050802635281.
  • Elbourn E, Toghe L, Kenny B, Power E.Strengthening the quality of longitudinal research into cognitive-communication recovery after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016;19(1):1–16. doi:10.1080/17549507.2016.1193896.
  • Isaki E, Turkstra L. Communication abilities and work re-entry following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2000;14:441–53. doi:10.1080/026990500120547.
  • Struchen MA, Papadis MR, Sander AM, Burrows CS, Myszka KA. Examining the contribution of social communication abilities and affective/behavioral functioning to social integration outcomes for adults with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011;26:30–42. doi:30-42.doi.10.1097/HTR.0b013e2048f7c.
  • Snow M, Douglas J, Ponsford J.Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: a follow-up study. Brain Inj. 1998;12(11):911–35. doi:10.1080/026990598121981.
  • Byom L, Turkstra LS.Cognitive task demands and discourse performance after traumatic brain injury. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017;52(4):501–13. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12289.
  • Tran S, Kenny B, Power E, Tate R, McDonald S, Heard R, Togher L. Cognitive-communication and social functioning 12 months after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2018;32(13–14):1700–11. doi:10.1080/02699052.2018.1537006.
  • Rabinowitz AR, Levin HS.Cognitive sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2014;37(1):1–11. doi:10.1016/j.psc.2013.11.004.
  • Dikmen S, Machamer J, Temkin N. Mild traumatic brain injury: longitudinal study of cognition, functional status, and post-traumatic symptoms. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34(8):1524–30. doi:10.1089/neu.2016.4618.
  • Tucker FM, Hanlon RE. Effects of mild traumatic brain injury on narrative discourse production. Brain Inj. 1998;12:783–92. doi:10.1080/026990598122179.
  • Stout CE, Yorkston KM, Pimentel JI.Discourse production following mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury: a comparison of two tasks. J Med Speech-Lang Pathol. 2000;8(1):15–25.
  • King KA, Hough MS, Walker MM, Rastatter M, Hobert D. Mild traumatic brain injury: effects of naming on word retrieval and discourse. Brain Inj. 2006;20:725–32. doi:10.1080/02699050600743824.
  • Barrow IM, Hough M, Rastatter MP, Walker M, Holbert D, Rotondo MF. Can within-category naming identify subtle cognitive deficits in the mild traumatic brain-injured patient? J Trauma. 2003;54:888–97. doi:10.1097/01.TA.0000057150.60668.7C.
  • Brown J, Knollman-Porter K. Evaluating cognitive-linguistic deficits post concussion in adults. Contributions of self-report and standardized measures. Top Lang Disorders. 2019;39(3):239–56. doi:10.1097/TLD.0000000000000186.
  • Kwok FY, Lee TM, Leung CH, Poon WS. Changes of cognitive functioning over a 3-month period. Brain Inj. 2008;22(10):740–51. doi:10.1080/02699050802336989.
  • McHugh T, RJr L, Gallagher P, Quinn S, Diggle P, Buchanan L.Natural history of the long-term effect of the cognitive, affective and physical sequelae of mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Cogn. 2006;60(2):193–217. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.09.018.
  • Stockbridge MD, Newman R. Enduring cognitive and linguistic deficits in individuals with a history of concussion. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;28:1554–70. doi:10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0196.
  • Williams DH, Levin HS, Eisenberg HM.Mild head injury classification. Neurosurgery. 1990;27(3):422–28. doi:10.1227/00006123-199009000-00014.
  • Yue JK, Winkler EA, Sharma S, Vassar MJ, Ratcliff JJ, Korley KF, Seabury SA, Ferguson AR, Lingsma HF, Deng H, et al. Temporal profile of care following mild brain injury: predictors of hospital admission, follow-up referral and 6-month outcome. Brain Inj. 2017;31(13–14):1820–29.
  • Kumar S, Rao SL, Chandramouli BA, Pillai S. Reduced contribution of executive functions in impaired working memory performance in mild traumatic brain injury patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115(8):1326–32. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.12.038.
  • Borgaro SR, Prigatano GP, Kwasnica C, Rexer JL.Cognitive and affective sequelae in complicated and uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2003;17(3):189–98. doi:10.1080/0269905021000013183.
  • Prigatano GP, Amin K, Rosenstein L. Validity studies on the BNI screen for higher cerebral functions. BNI Quarterly. 1995;9:2–9.
  • LeBlanc J, de Guise E, Champoux M-C, Couturier C, Lamoureux J, Marcoux J, Maleki M, Feyz M. Early conversational discourse abilities following traumatic brain injury: an acute predictive study. Brain Inj. 2014;28(7):951–58. doi:doi.10.3109/02699052.2014.888760.
  • Gauthier S, LeBlanc J, Seresova A, Laberge-Poirier A, Correa JA, Alturkie AY, Marcoux J, Maleki M, Feyz M, de Guise E. Acute prediction of outcome and cognitive-communication impairments following traumatic brain injury: the influence of age, education and site of lesion. J Commun Disord. 2018;73:77–90. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.04.003.
  • Galski T, Tompkins C, Johnston M. Competence in discourse as a measure of social; integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 1998;12:769–82. doi:10.1080/026990598122160.
  • Levin HS, Boake C, Song J, McCauley S, Contant C, Diaz-Marchan P, Brundage S, Goodman H, Kotria KJ. Validity and sensitivity to change of the extended Glasgow outcome scale in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2001;18(6):575–84. doi:doi.10.1089/089771501750291819.
  • Rappaport M, Hal KM, Hopkins HK, Belleza T, Cope DN. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63:118–23.
  • Goodglass H, Kaplan E. Boston diagnostic aphasia examination. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lea and Febiger; 1983.
  • Baker HJ, Leland B. Detroit test of learning aptitude. Indianapolis (IN): Bobbs-Merrill; 1965.
  • Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston naming test. 2nd ed. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Willliams and Wilkins; 2001
  • Joanette Y, Ska B, Côté H. Protocole Montréal d’évaluation de la communication. Isbergues: Ortho Édition; 2004.
  • Benton AL, Hamsher K. Multilingual aphasia examination manual. Rev.ed. Iowa City: University of Iowa; 1976.
  • Canadian adult achievement test. Toronto (ON): The Psychological Corporation, and Harcourt Brace & Company; 1988.
  • Test de rendement pour francophones. Toronto (ON): Harcourt Brace & Company and The Psychological Corporation; 1995.
  • Côté H, Moix V, Giroux F. Évaluation des troubles de la communication des cérébrolésés droits. Rééducation orthophonique. 2004;219:107–22.
  • Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D. Neuropsychological assessment. 5th ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2012.
  • Fonseca RP, Joanette Y, Côté H, Ska B, Giroux F, Fachel JMG, Ferreira GD, Parente MAMP.Brazilian version of the protocole montréal d’évaluation de la communication (Protocole MEC): normative and reliability data. Span J Psychol. 2008;11(2):678–88. doi:10.1017/S1138741600004686.
  • McMillan T, Wilson L, Ponsford J, Levin H, Teasdale G, Bond M. The Glasgow outcome scale- 40 years of application and refinement. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12:477–85. doi:10.1038/nmeurol.2016.89.
  • McMillan T, Weir CJ, Ireland A, Steward E. The Glasgow outcome at discharge scale: an inpatient assessment of disability after brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30:970–74. doi:10.1089/neu.2012.2703.
  • Dams-O’Connor K, Spielman L, Singh A, Gordon WA, Lingma HF, Maas AI, Manley GT, Mukherjee D, Okonkwo DO, Puccio AM, et al. The impact of previous brain injury on health and functioning: a TRACK-TBI study. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30(24):2014–220. doi:10.1089/neu.2013.3049.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.