Sex-based differences in expectations for social communication after TBI

References

• Dahlberg CA, Cusick CP, Hawley LA, Newman JK, Morey CE, Harrison-Felix CL, Whiteneck GG. Treatment efficacy of social communication skills training after traumatic brain injury: a randomized treatment and deferred treatment controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2007;88:1561–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Body R, Perkins MR.Ecological validity in assessment of discourse in traumatic brain injury: ratings by clinicians and non-clinicians. Brain Inj. 1998;12(11):963–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg C, Hawley L, Morey C, Newman J, Cusick CP, Harrison-Felix C.Social communication skills in persons with post-acute traumatic brain injury: three perspectives. Brain Inj. 2006;20(4):425–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J.Using the La Trobe communication questionnaire to measure perceived social communication ability in adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Brain Imp. 2010;11(2):171–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC.The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabil. 2007;22(5):341–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. ASHA counts for year end 2013. Membership and Affiliation Profile [Internet]. 2013 Accessed July 25, 2014. http://www.asha.org/research/memberdata/.
   Google Scholar
• Doser K, Norup A. Family needs in the chronic phase after severe brain injury in Denmark. Brain Inj. 2014;28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bayen E, Pradat-Diehl P, Jourdan C, Ghout I, Bosserelle V, Azerad S, Weiss JJ, Joël ME, Aegerter P, Azouvi P; Steering Committee of the PariS-TBI study. Predictors of informal care burden 1 year after a severe traumatic brain injury: results from the PariS-TBI study. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2013;28:408–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boycott N, Yeoman P, Vesey P.Factors associated with strain in carers of people with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013;28(2):106–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulin SL, Perrin PB, Stevens LF, Villasenor-Cabrera TJ, Jimenez-Maldonado M, Martinez-Cortes ML, Arango-Lasprilla JC. Health-related quality of life and mental health outcomes in Mexican TBI caregivers. Fam Syst Health 2014;32:53–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem SL.The measurement of psychological androgyny. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974;42(2):155–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem SL. Gender schema theory. A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychol Rev. 1981;88:354–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seem RS, Clark MD. Healthy women, healthy men, and healthy adults: an evaluation of gender role stereotypes in the twenty-first century. Sex Roles. 2006;55:247–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auster CJ, Ohm SC. Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: A reevaluation using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles. 2000;43:499–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosacki S, Astington JW.Theory of mind in preadolescence: relations between social understanding and social competence. Social Dev. 1999;8(2):237–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier RA, Lavrakas PJ, Bentley B, Parrella G.Role of sex identification in perception of a social blunder. Percept Mot Skills. 1977;45(3 Pt 1):933–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J, O’Flaherty C, Snow P. Measuring perception of communication ability: the development and evaluation of the La Trobe communication questionnaire. Aphasiol. 2000;14:251–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice HP. Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL, editors. Syntax and Semantics. New York: Academic Press; 1975. p. 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Damico JS. Clinical Discoure Analysis. In: Simon CS, editor. Communication skills and classroom success. London: Taylor & Francis; 1985. p. 165–203.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas JM, Bracy CA, Snow PC.Exploring the factor structure of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire: insights into the nature of communication deficits following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiol. 2007;21(12):1181–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM.Relation of executive functioning to pragmatic outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(2):365–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracy C, Douglas J. Marital dyad perceptions of injured partners’ communication following traumatic brain injury. Brain Imp. 2005;6:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Watts AJ, Douglas JM.Interpreting facial expression and communication competence following severe traumatic brain injury. Aphasiol. 2006;20(8):707–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietdijk R, Simpson G, Togher L, Power E, Gillett L.An exploratory prospective study of the association between communication skills and employment outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013;27(7–8):812–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struchen MA, Clark AN, Sander AM, Mills MR, Evans G, Kurtz D.Relation of executive functioning and social communication measures to functional outcomes following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabil. 2008;23(2):185–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow PC, Douglas JM.Conceptual and methodological challenges in discourse assessment with TBI speakers: towards an understanding. Brain Inj. 2000;10(5):397–415.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice DA, Carranza E.What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: the contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychol Women. 2002;26(4):269–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, Youse KM, Le KN. Conversational discourse in closed-head-injured and non-brain-injured adults. Aphasiol. 2002;16:659–72.
   Google Scholar
• Bond F, Godfrey HPD.Conversation with traumatically brain-injured individuals: a controlled study of behavioural changes and their impact. Brain Inj. 1997;11(5):319–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shatz M, Gelman R.The development of communication skills: modifications in the speech of young children as a function of listener. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1973;38(5):1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre-Pinard M, Vézina L, Bouffard-Bouchard T, Strayer FF.Social cognition and dyadic communication among preschool children. Int Journal Psycholing. 1980;7(1–2):59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Despins EH, Turkstra LS, Struchen MA, Clark AN.Sex-based differences in perceived pragmatic communication ability of adults with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(2 Suppl):S26–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald PA.An examination of the current usefulness of the Bem sex-role inventory. Psychol Rep. 2004;94(3,Pt2):1331–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde JS. Gender similarities and differences. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:373–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiler AP, Epstein M. Measuring gender: options and issues. In: Chrisler JC, McCreary DR, editors. Handbook of gender research in psychology, Vol 1: gender research in general and experimental psychology. New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media; 2010. p. 133–57.
   Google Scholar
• Boker SM, Cohn JF, Theobald BJ, Matthews I, Mangini M, Spies JR, Ambadar Z, Brick TR. Something in the way we move: motion dynamics, not perceived sex, influence head movements in conversation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2011;37:874–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindia K. Men are from North Dakota, Women are From South Dakota. In: Dindia K, Canary DJ, editors. Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication. Mahwah, New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates; 2006. p. 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Rigon A, Turkstra L, Mutlu B, Duff M.The female advantage: sex as a possible protective factor against emotion recognition impairment following traumatic brain injury. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016;16(5):866–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkstra LS, Norman RS, Mutlu B, Duff MC. Impaired theory of mind in adults with traumatic brain injury: A replication and extension of findings. Neuropsychologia. 2018;111:117–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbage DR, Zupan B, Neumann D, Willer B.Sex differences in response to emotion recognition training after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2018;32(12):1492–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupan B, Neumann D, Babbage D, Willer B.Sex-based differences in affective and cognitive empathy following severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2018;32(5):554–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresham FM, Elliott SN. Social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Angeleri R, Bosco FM, Zettin M, Sacco K, Colle L, Bara BG.Communicative impairment in traumatic brain injury: a complete pragmatic assessment. Brain Lang. 2008;107(3):229–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGann W, Werven G, Douglas MM.Social competence and head injury: a practical approach. Brain Inj. 1997;11(9):621–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linscott RJ, Knight RG, Godfrey HP.The profile of functional impairment in communication (PFIC): a measure of communication impairment for clinical use. Brain Inj. 1996;10(6):397–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Issues in ethics: cultural and linguistic competence. [Internet]. 2017. www.asha.org/Practice/ethics/Cultural-and-Linguistic-Competence/.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. What do we mean by ‘sex’ and ‘gender’? 2011. http://www.who.int/gender/whatisgender/en/.
   Google Scholar