Body representation in people with apraxia post Stroke– an observational study

References

• Park JE. Apraxia: review and update. J Clin Neurol. 2017;13(4):317–24. doi:10.3988/jcn.2017.13.4.317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Kammersgaard LP, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Manual and oral apraxia in acute stroke, frequency and influence on functional outcome: the copenhagen stroke study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(9):685–92. doi:10.1097/00002060-200109000-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donkervoort M, Dekker J, van den Ende E, Stehmann-Saris JC, Deelman BG. Prevalence of apraxia among patients with a first left hemisphere stroke in rehabilitation centres and nursing homes. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(2):130–36. doi:10.1191/026921500668935800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foundas AL, Macauley BL, Raymer AM, Maher LM, Heilman KM, Gonzalez Rothi LJ. Ecological implications of limb apraxia: evidence from mealtime behavior. J Int Neuropsychol Soc: JINS. 1995;1(1):62–66. doi:10.1017/s1355617700000114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanna-Pladdy B, Heilman KM, Foundas AL. Ecological implications of ideomotor apraxia: evidence from physical activities of daily living. Neurology. 2003;60(3):487–90. doi:10.1212/WNL.60.3.487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arntzen C, Elstad I. The bodily experience of apraxia in everyday activities: a phenomenological study. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(1):63–72. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.687032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blijlevens H, Hocking C, Paddy A. Rehabilitation of adults with dyspraxia: health professionals learning from patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(6):466–75. doi:10.1080/09638280802131093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland A, Shinner C. Ideomotor apraxia and functional ability. Cortex. 2002;43:359–67. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70461-1.
   Google Scholar
• Sundet K, Finset A, Reinvang I. Neuropsychological predictors in stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1988;10(4):363–79. doi:10.1080/01688638808408245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civelek GM, Atalay A, Turhan N. Association of ideomotor apraxia with lesion site, etiology, neglect, and functional independence in patients with first ever stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015;22(2):94–101. doi:10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YC, Kapellusch J, Garg A. Important factors influencing the return to work after stroke. Work (Reading, Mass). 2014;47(4):553–59. doi:10.3233/WOR-131627.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saeki S, Ogata H, Okubo T, Takahashi K, Hoshuyama T. Return to work after stroke. A follow-up study. Stroke. 1995;26(3):399–401. doi:10.1161/01.STR.26.3.399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiguarda RC, Marsden CD. Limb apraxias: higher-order disorders of sensorimotor integration. Brain. 2000;123:860–79. doi:10.1093/brain/123.5.860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Renzi E, Motti F, Nichelli P. Imitating gestures. A quantitative approach to ideomotor apraxia. Arch Neurol. 1980;37(1):6–10. doi:10.1001/archneur.1980.00500500036003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum LJ, Randerath J. Limb apraxia and the left parietal lobe. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;151:349–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldenberg G. Apraxia and the parietal lobes. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47(6):1449–59. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg G. Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience neglecting apraxia? Trends Cogn Sci. 2006;10(3):94–95. author reply 95–96. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg G. Imitating gestures and manipulating a mannikin–the representation of the human body in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia. 1995;33(1):63–72. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(94)00104-W.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessari A, Tsakiris M, Borghi AM, Serino A. The sense of body: a multidisciplinary approach to body representation. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(3):643–44. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina J, Coslett HB. From maps to form to space: touch and the body schema. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(3):645–54. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard PW, M D. Disorders of body scheme. In: Freund H, Jeannerod M, Hallett M, Leiguarda R, editors. Higher-order motor disorders from neuroanatomy and neurobiology to clinical neurology. USA: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 261–71.
   Google Scholar
• Sirigu A, Grafman J, Bressler K, Sunderland T. Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing. Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia. Brain:j Neurol. 1991;114(Pt 1B):629–42. doi:10.1093/brain/114.1.629.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries S, Tepper M, Feenstra W, Oosterveld H, Boonstra AM, Otten B. Motor imagery ability in stroke patients: the relationship between implicit and explicit motor imagery measures. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:790. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons LM. Imagined spatial transformations of one’s hands and feet. Cogn Psychol. 1987;19(2):178–241. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90011-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anema HA, van Zandvoort MJ, de Haan EH, Kappelle LJ, de Kort PL, Jansen BP, Dijkerman HC. A double dissociation between somatosensory processing for perception and action. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47(6):1615–20. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenza C, Goodglass H. Localization of body parts in brain injured subjects. Neuropsychologia. 1985;23(2):161–75. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(85)90101-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vignemont F. Body schema and body image–pros and cons. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(3):669–80. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo MR, Azanon E, Haggard P. More than skin deep: body representation beyond primary somatosensory cortex. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(3):655–68. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB. Specialised structural descriptions for human body parts: evidence from autotopagnosia. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001;18(4):289–306. doi:10.1080/02643290126172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessari A, Ottoboni G, Symes E, Cubelli R. Hand processing depends on the implicit access to a spatially and bio-mechanically organized structural description of the body. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(3):681–88. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon JR, Rudell AP. Auditory s-r compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol. 1967;51(3):300–04. doi:10.1037/h0020586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottoboni G, Tessari A, Cubelli R, Umilta C. Is handedness recognition automatic? A study using a simon-like paradigm. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005;31(4):778–89. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessari A, Ottoboni G, Baroni G, Symes E, Nicoletti R. Is access to the body structural description sensitive to a body part’s significance for action and cognition? A study of the sidedness effect using feet. Exp Brain Res. 2012;218(4):515–25. Epub 02012 Mar 00229. 10.1007/s00221-00012-03045-00224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasino B, Rumiati RI, Umiltá CA. Selective deficit of motor imagery as tapped by a left-right decision of visually presented hands. Brain Cogn. 2003;53(2):376–80. doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00147-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amesz S, Tessari A, Ottoboni G, Marsden J. An observational study of implicit motor imagery using laterality recognition of the hand after stroke. Brain Inj. 2016;30(8):999–1004. doi:10.3109/02699052.2016.1147600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum LJ, Saffran EM. Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain Lang. 2002;82(2):179–99. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00014-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg G. Matching and imitation of hand and finger postures in patients with damage in the left or right hemispheres. Neuropsychologia. 1999;37(5):559–66. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00111-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg G, Hagmann S. The meaning of meaningless gestures: a study of visuo-imitative apraxia. Neuropsychologia. 1997;35(3):333–41. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00085-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessari A, Mengotti G, Faccioli L, Tuozzi G, Boscararto S, Taricco M, Rumiati RI. Effect of meaning and body-part specificity in gesture imitation in left hemisphere stroke patients. Neuropsychologia. 2021;151:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dafsari HS, Dovern A, Fink GR, Weiss PH. Deficient body structural description contributes to apraxic end-position errors in imitation. Neuropsychologia. 2019;133:107150. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum LJ, Giovannetti T, Libon D. The role of the dynamic body schema in praxis: evidence from primary progressive apraxia. Brain Cogn. 2000;44(2):166–91. doi:10.1006/brcg.2000.1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amesz S. Laterality recognition after stroke. [Plymouth University]: Plymouth University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet. 1991;337(8756):1521–26. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)93206-O.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The barthel adl index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61–63. doi:10.3109/09638288809164103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enderby PM, Wood VA, Wade DT, Hewer RL. The frenchay aphasia screening test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. Int Rehabil Med. 1987;8(4):166–70. doi:10.3109/03790798709166209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reitan RM. Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual Motor Skills. 1958;8:271–76. doi:10.2466/pms.1958.8.3.271.
   Google Scholar
• Corsi PM. Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. [Montreal, Canada]: MCGill University; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P. Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68(2):98–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven JC. Progressive matrices: a perceptual test of intelligence. London, England: H.K. Lewis; 1938.
   Google Scholar
• Tessari A, Toraldo A, Lunardelli A, Zadini A, Rumiati RI. Stima: a short screening test for ideo-motor apraxia, selective for action meaning and bodily district. Neurol Sci. 2015;36(6):977–84. Epub 12015 Apr 10077. 10.1007/s10072-10015-12203-10074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwoebel J, Coslett HB. Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005;17(4):543–53. doi:10.1162/0898929053467587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwoebel J, Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB. Representations of the human body in the production and imitation of complex movements. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004;21(2–4):285–98. doi:10.1080/02643290342000348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daprati E, Nico D, Duval S, Lacquaniti F. Different motor imagery modes following brain damage. Cortex. 2010;46(8):1016–30. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May M, Wendt M. Visual perspective taking and laterality decisions: problems and possible solutions. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:549. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auclair L, Noulhiane M, Raibaut P, Amarenco G. Where are your body parts? A pure case of heterotopagnosia following left parietal stroke. Neurocase. 2009;15(6):459–65. doi:10.1080/13554790902911642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland A. Impaired imitation of meaningless gestures in ideomotor apraxia: a conceptual problem not a disorder of action control? A single case investigation. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45(8):1621–31. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapparoli L, Invernizzi P, Gandola M, Berlingeri M, De Santis A, Zerbi A, Banfi G, Paulesu E. Like the back of the (right) hand? A new fmri look on the hand laterality task. Exp Brain Res. 2014;232(12):3873–95. doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4065-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferri F, Frassinetti F, Ardizzi M, Costantini M, Gallese V. A sensorimotor network for the bodily self. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012;24(7):1584–95. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lange FP, Helmich RC, Toni I. Posture influences motor imagery: an fmri study. NeuroImage. 2006;33(2):609–17. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwoebel J, Friedman R, Duda N, Coslett HB. Pain and the body schema: evidence for peripheral effects on mental representations of movement. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 10):2098–104. doi:10.1093/brain/124.10.2098.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cleret de Langavant L, Trinkler I, Cesaro P, Bachoud-Levi AC. Heterotopagnosia: when i point at parts of your body. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47(7):1745–55. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felician O, Ceccaldi M, Didic M, Thinus-Blanc C, Poncet M. Pointing to body parts: a double dissociation study. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(10):1307–16. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00046-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felician O, Romaiguere P, Anton JL, Nazarian B, Roth M, Poncet M, Roll JP. The role of human left superior parietal lobule in body part localization. Ann Neurol. 2004;55(5):749–51. doi:10.1002/ana.20109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum LJ. Ideomotor apraxia: a call to action. Neurocase. 2001;7(6):445–58. doi:10.1093/neucas/7.6.445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessari A, Ottoboni G, Mazzatenta A, Merla A, Nicoletti R, Alain C. Please don’t! The automatic extrapolation of dangerous intentions. PloS One. 2012;7(11):e49011. Epub 0042012 Nov 0049014. 10.41371/journal.pone.0049011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility–a model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev. 1990;97(2):253–70. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorzi M, Umilta C. A computational model of the simon effect. Psychol Res. 1995;58(3):193–205. doi:10.1007/BF00419634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessari A, Canessa N, Ukmar M, Rumiati RI. Neuropsychological evidence for a strategic control of multiple routes in imitation. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 4):1111–26. doi:10.1093/brain/awm003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubelli R, Marchetti C, Boscolo G, Della Sala S. Cognition in action: testing a model of limb apraxia. Brain Cogn. 2000;44(2):144–65. doi:10.1006/brcg.2000.1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothi LJ, Ochipa C, H KM. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1991;8(6):443–58. doi:10.1080/02643299108253382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar