About time: a comparison of computerized and manual procedures for grammatical and phonological analysis

References

• AMERICAN GUIDANCE SERVICE,2000, Speech and Language Assessment and Instruction Catalog (Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service).
   Google Scholar
• AMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOCIATION,1999, 1999 Omnibus Survey Caseload Report: SLP (Rockville, MD: ASHA).
   Google Scholar
• AMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOCIATION,2000, Responding to the changing needs of speech-language pathology and audiology students in the 21st century (Rockville, MD: Author, retrieved June 17, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.asha.org/ student s/changing htm).
   Google Scholar
• BAUMAN-WAENGLER, J., 2000, Articulatory and Phonological Impairments: A Clinical Focus (Boston: Allyn & Bacon).
   Google Scholar
• BERNHARDT, B.H., and STEMBERGER, J.P., 2000, Workbook in Nonlinear Phonology for Clinical Application (Austin, TX: Pro-Ed).
   Google Scholar
• BERNSTEIN-RATNER, N., 1984, Patterns of vowel modification in motherese. Journal of Child Language, 11, 557 —578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BERNTHAL, J.E., and BANKSON, N.W., 1998, Articulation and Phonological Disorders, Fourth Edition (Boston: Allyn & Bacon).
   Google Scholar
• CHANNELL, R.W., and JOHNSON, B.W., 1999, Automated grammatical tagging of child language samples. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 727–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRYSTAL, D., 1979, Working With LARSP (London: Edward Arnold).
   Google Scholar
• CRYSTAL, D., 1981, Clinical Linguistics (New York, NY: Springer-Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• CRYSTAL, D., 1982, Profiling Linguistic Disability (London: Edward Arnold).
   Google Scholar
• CRYSTAL, D., FLETCHER, P., and GARMAN, M., 1976, Grammatical Analysis of Language Disability (London: Edward Arnold).
   Google Scholar
• FEY, M.E., 1986, Language Intervention with Young Children (Boston: College-Hill Press).
   Google Scholar
• FEY, M.E., CLEAVE, P.L., RAVIDA, A.I., LONG, S.H., DEJMAL, A.E., and EASTON, D.L., 1994, Effects of grammar facilitation on the phonological performance of children with speech and language impairments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 594–607.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GRUNWELL, P., 1987, Clinical Phonology, Second edition (Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins).
   Google Scholar
• HADLEY, P.A., 1999, Validating a rate-based measure of early grammatical abilities: unique syntactic types. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 261–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HODSON, B.W., and PADEN, E.P., 1983, Targeting Intelligible Speech (San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press).
   Google Scholar
• HODSON, B., 1986, The Assessment of Phonological Processes-Revised (Danville, IL: Interstate Press).
   Google Scholar
• INGRAM, D., 1981, Procedures for the Phonological Analysis of Children's Language (Baltimore, MD: University Park Press).
   Google Scholar
• KLEE, T., 1985, Clinical language sampling: analysing the analyses. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 1, 182–198.
   Google Scholar
• LAHEY, M., 1988, Language Disorders and Language Development (New York, NY: Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• LEADHOLM, B.J., and MILLER, J.F., 1992, Language Sample Analysis: The Wisconsin Guide (Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction).
   Google Scholar
• LEE, L.L., 1974, Developmental Sentence Analysis (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).
   Google Scholar
• LONG, S.H., 1996, Why Johnny (or Joanne) can't parse. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• LONG, S.H., 1999, Technology applications in the assessment of children's language. Seminars in Speech and Hearing, 20, 117–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LONG, S.H., BRIAN, J., OLSWANG, L.B., and DALE, P.S., 1997, Productivity of emerging word combinations in toddlers with specific expressive language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 6, 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• LONG, S.H., FEY, M.E., and CHANNELL, R.W., 1996–2000, Computerized Profiling, Versions 9.0.3-9.2.7 (MS-DOS) [Computer program] (Cleveland, OH: Department of Communication Sciences, Case Western Reserve University).
   Google Scholar
• LONG, S.H., and MASTERSON, J.J., 1993, September, Computer technology: Use in language analysis. Asha, 35, 40-41, 51.
   Google Scholar
• MILLER, J.F., 1981, Assessing Language Production in Children (Baltimore: University Park Press).
   Google Scholar
• Cole K.N., Dale P.S. and Thal D.J. (Eds) Assessment of Communication and Language (Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes), pp. 309–324.
   Google Scholar
• MILLER, J.F. CHAPMAN, R.S., 1993, Systematic analysis of language transcripts (SALT), Version 3.0 (MS-DOS) [Computer program] (Madison, WI: Language Analysis Laboratory, Waisman Center on Mental Retardation and Human Development).
   Google Scholar
• OCHS, E., 1979, Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs and Schieffelin B.B. (Eds) Developmental Pragmatics (New York, NY: Academic Press), pp. 43–72.
   Google Scholar
• OWENS, R.E., 1999, Language Disorders: A Functional Approach to Assessment and Intervention, Third Edition, (Boston: Allyn & Bacon).
   Google Scholar
• PAUL, R., 1995, Language Disorders from Infancy Through Adolescence (St. Louis: Mosby).
   Google Scholar
• SCARBOROUGH, H.S., 1990, Index of productive syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHRIBERG, L.D., and KWIATKOWSKI, J., 1980, Natural Process Analysis (NPA) (New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons).
   Google Scholar
• SHRIBERG, L.D., and KWIATKOWSKI, J., 1982, Phonologic disorders III: A procedure for assessing severity of involvement Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 256–270.
   Google Scholar
• STOEL-GAMMON, C., and DUNN, C., 1993, Normal and Disordered Phonology in Children (Austin, TX: Pro-Ed).
   Google Scholar
• TYACK, D., and VENABLE, G.P., 1999, Language Sampling, Analysis, and Training: A Handbook, third edition (Austin, TX: Pro-Ed).
   Google Scholar