Advanced search
Publication Cover
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics Volume 17, 2003 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
218
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The omission of subject arguments in children with Specific Language Impairment

Bernard G. Grela University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA
Pages 153-169 | Published online: 09 Jul 2009

  • BLOOM, P., 1989. Why do children omit subjects? Papers and Reports on Child Language Development. 28. 57-64.
  • BLOOM, P., 1990. Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 491-504.
  • BLOOM, P., 1993. Grammatical continuity in language development: the case of subjectless sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 721-734.
  • BOCK, K. and LEVELT, W., 1994. Grammatical encoding. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Phycholinguistics (San Diego. CA: Academic Press), pp. 945-984.
  • BURGENFISTER, B. B., BLUM, L. H. and LORGE, I., 1972. Columhia Assessment of Noverbal Abilities, third edition (New York: The Psychological Corporation).
  • CARROW-WOOLFOLK, E., 1985. Text fur Auditory Comprehension of Language (Austin, TX: Pro-Ed ).
  • CHONSKY, N., 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding (Dordrecht: Foris).
  • DOLLAGHAN, C. and CAMPBELL, T. F., 1998. Nonword repetition and child language impairment. Journal of Speech. Language and Hearing Research. 41, 1136-1146.
  • ELLIS WEISMER, S., 1994. Factors influencing novel word learning and linguistic processing in children with specific language impairment (Paper presented at the Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders, Madison. WI. June).
  • ELLIS WEISMER, S., 1996. Lexical learning by children with specific language impairment: effects of linguistic input presented at varying speaking rates. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 39, 177 190.
  • ELLIS WEISMER, S., EVANS, J. L. and HESKETH, L. J., 1999. An examination of verbal working memory capacity in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech. Language ami Hearing Research. 42, 1249-1260.
  • ELLIS WEISMER, S., TOMBLIN, J. B., ZHANG, X., BUCKWALTER, P., CHYNOWETH, J. G. and JONES, M., 2000. Nonword repetition performance in school-age children with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech language and Hearing Research. 43, 865-878.
  • FLETCHER, P., 1997. The effect of verb semantics on syntax in children with specific language impairment (Poster presented at the Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders. Madison. WI. May).
  • GATHERCOLE, S. E. and BADDELEY, A. A., 1993. Working Memory and Language (Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services).
  • GRETA, B. G. and LEONARD, L. B., 1997. The use of subject arguments by children with specific language impairment. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. 11, 443-453.
  • GRELA, B. G. and LEONARD, L. B., 2000. The influence of argument structure complexity on the use of auxiliary verbs by children with SLI. Journal of Speech. Language and Hearing Research. 43, 1115-1125.
  • HYAMS, N., 1986. Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters (Dordrecht: Reidel).
  • INGHAM, R., 1992. The optional subject phenomenon in young children's English: a case study. Journal of Child Language, 19, 133-151.
  • JAEGGLI, O. and SAFIR, K., 1989. The null subject parameter and parametric theory. In O. Jaeggli and K. Salir (Eds). The Null Subject Parameter (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 1-44.
  • JOHNSHON, J. R., 1991. Questions about cognition in children with specific language impairment. In J. Miller (Ed). Research on Child Language Disorders (Austin. TX: Pro-Ed). pp. 299-307.
  • JOHNSTON, J. R., 1994. Cognitive abilities of children with language impairment. In K. Watkins and M. Rice (Eds) Specific Language Impairments in Children: Vol. 4 (Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., lnc). pp. 107-121.
  • LEONARD, L. B., 1995. Functional categories in the grammars of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1270-1283.
  • LEONARD, L. U., EYIR, J. A., BEDORE, L. M. and GRELA, B. G., 1997. Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language-impairment. Journal of Speech. Language and Hearing Research, 40, 741-753.
  • LEONARD, L. B., MILLER, C. A., GRILA, B. G., HOLLAND, A. L., GERBER, E. and PEICCI. M., 2000. Production operations contribute to the grammatical morpheme limitation of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Memory and Language. 43, 362-378.
  • LEVINE, M. N., 1982. Leiter International Performance Scale (Los Angeles. CA: Western Psychological Services).
  • LINDNER, K. and JOHNSTON, J. R., 1992. Grammatical morphology in language-impaired children acquiring English or German :is their first language: a functional perspective. Applied Psycholinguistic. 13, 115-129.
  • MCGREGOR, K. and LEONARD, L., 1994. Subject pronoun and article omissions in the speech of children with specific language impairment: a phonological interpretation, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 171-181.
  • MILLER, C. A. and LEONARD, L., 1998. Deficits in finite verb morphology: some assumptions in recent accounts of specific language impairment. Journal of Speech. Language and Hearing Research, 41, 701-707.
  • O'GRADY, W., PETERS, A. M. and MASTERON, D., 1989. The transition from option to required subjects. Journal of Child Language, 16, 513-529.
  • REYNELL, J. K. and GRUBER, C. P., 1990. Reynell Developmental Language Scales (Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Service).
  • RICE, M. L. and How;. J. V., 1993. Gaps in the verb lexicons of children with specific language impairment, First Language, 13, 113-131.
  • RICE, M. L. and WEXLER, K., 1996. Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1239-1257.
  • RICE, M. L., WEXLER, K. and CLEAVE, P. L., 1995. Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 850-863.
  • SHAPIRO, L. P., 1997, Tutorial: An introduction to syntax. Journal of Speech. Language and Hearing Research, 40, 254-272.
  • SHAPIRO, L. P., ZURIE, E. and GRIMSHAW, J., 1987. Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs. Cognition, 27, 219-246.
  • SHAPIRO, L. P., BROOKINS, B., GORDON, B. and NAGEL, N., 1991. Verb effects during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psycholosy: Learning. Memory and Cognition, 17, 983-996.
  • ST, LOUIS, K. O. and RUSCELLO, D. M., 1981. Oral Speech Mechanism Screening Evaluation R (Austin, TX: Pro-Ed ).
  • VALIAN, V., ACBREY, S. and HOEFFNER, J., 1996. Young children's imitation of sentence subjects: evidence of processing limitations. Development Psychology, 32, 153-164.
  • WANG, Q., LILLO-MARTIN, D., BESI, C. T. and LEVITT, A., 1992. Null subject versus null object: some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition, 2, 221-254.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.