Topic repetitiveness after traumatic brain injury: An emergent, jointly managed behaviour

References

• Blair, R.J.R., SE Cipolotti, L. (2000). Impaired social response reversal: a case of 'acquired sociopathy'. Brain, 123, 1122–1141.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald S., Code C., & Togher L.(Eds.), Communication in Traumatic Brain Injury (pp. 81–112). Sydney: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, F., & Godfrey, H.P.D. (1997). Conversation with traumatically brain-injured individuals: a controlled study of behavioural changes and their impact. Brain Injury, 11, 319–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Button, G., & Casey, N. (1985). Topic nomination and topic pursuit. Human Studies, 8, 3–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H.H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, C.A., Duffy, R.J., & Liles, B.Z. (1991). Analysis of conversational discourse in head-injured adults. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 6,92–98.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, C.A., Youse, K.M., & Le, K.N. (2002). Conversational discourse in closed-head-injured and non-brain-injured adults. Aphasiology, 16, 659–672.
   Google Scholar
• Croteau, C., Vychytil, A.-M., Larfeuil, C., & Le Dorze, G. (2004). "Speaking for" behaviours in spouses of people with aphasia: a descriptive study of six couples in an interview situation. Aphasiology, 18, 291–312.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbinson, S. (2000) Repetitiveness and productivity in the language of adults with autism, Unpublished PhD, University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., O'Flaherty, C.A., & Snow, P. (2000). Measuring perception of communicative ability: the development and evaluation of the La Trobe communication questionnaire. Aphasiology, 14, 251–268.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, P.E., & Haynes, W.O. (1988). Topic manipulation and conversational participation as a function of familiarity in school-age language-impaired and normal language peers. Journal of Communication Disorders, 21, 209–228.
   Google Scholar
• Ellmo, W.J., Graser, J.M., Krchnavek, E.A., Calabrese, D.B., & Hauck, K. (1995). Measure of Cognitive-Linguistic Abilities. Florida: The Speech Bin.
   Google Scholar
• Friedland, D., & Miller, N. (1998). Conversation analysis of communication breakdown after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 12, 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafman, J., Schwab, K., Warden, D., Pridgen, B.S., Brown, H.R., & Salazar, A.M. (1996). Frontal lobe injuries, violence, and aggression: a report of the Vietnam Head Injury Study. Neurology, 46, 1231–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotz, G., & Helm-Estabrooks, N. (1995). Perseveration. Part I: a review. Brain Injury, 9,151–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, J., & Wilkinson, R. (1999). Repair sequences in aphasic talk: a comparison of aphasic-speech and language therapist and aphasic-spouse conversations. Aphasiology, 13, 305–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2003). Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain and Language, 85, 451–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. (2000). Putting communication disorders in context after traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 14, 339–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., & Rollins, J. (2002). The Awareness of Social Inference Test. Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., & Pearce, S. (1998). Requests that overcome listener reluctance: impairment associated with executive dysfunction in brain injury. Brain and Language, 61, 88–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S., Togher L., & Code C.(Eds.), Communication Disorders following Traumatic Brain Injury (pp. 19–54). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mentis, M., & Pruning, C. (1991). Analysis of topic as illustrated in a head-injured and a normal adult. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 583–595.
   Google Scholar
• Park, N.W., Conrod, B., Rewilak, D., Kwon, C., Gao, F.-Q., & Black, S.E. (2001). Automatic activation of positive but not negative attitudes after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 39,7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, S., McDonald, S., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Interpreting ambiguous advertisements: the effect of frontal lobe damage. Brain and Cognition, 38, 150–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, L., Whitworth, A., & Lesser, R. (1997). Conversation Analysis Profile for People with Cognitive Impairment. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Windsor F., Kelly M.L., & Hewlett N.(Eds.), Investigations in Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics (pp. 1–14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, M.R. (2005). Pragmatic ability and disability as emergent phenomena. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 367–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins M., & Howard S.(Eds.), Case Studies in Clinical Linguistics (pp. 293–320). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J.A., Hale, M.A., & Bayer, A.J. (1995). Symptoms of communication breakdown in dementia: carers' perceptions. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 30, 65–75.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, J., & Tarplee, C. (2000). The management of conversational topic by a 10-year-old-child with pragmatic difficulties. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 14, 387–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psathas G.(Ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 23–78). New York: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Selting, M. (2000). The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society, 29, 477–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, P., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1997). Conversational assessment following traumatic brain injury: a comparison across two control groups. Brain Injury, 11, 409–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, P., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1998). Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: a follow-up study. Brain Injury, 12, 911–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., Hand, L., & Code, C. (1997). Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury, 11, 169–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., McDonald, S., Code, C., & Grant, S. (2004). Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial. Aphasiology, 18, 313–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkstra, L., McDonald, S., & DePompei, R. (2001). Social information processing in adolescents: data from normally developing adolescents and preliminary data from their peers with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16, 469–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Borsel, J., Schelpe, L., Santens, P., de Vos, N., & de Vos, C. (2001). Linguistic features in palilalia: two case studies. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 15, 663–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallesch, C.-W. (1990). Repetitive verbal behaviour: functional and neurological considerations. Aphasiology, 4, 133–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox, A., SE Mogford-Bevan, K. (1995). Assessing conversational disability. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 9, 235–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B., Alderman, N., Burgess, P.W., Emslie, H., & Evans, J.J. (1996). Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome. Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker, M., & Feeney, T.J. (1998). Collaborative Brain Injuty Rehabilitation: positive everyday routines. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.
   Google Scholar