Argumentation with restricted linguistic ability: Performing a role play with aphasia or in a second language

References

• Niemi J., & P. Koivuselka-Sallinen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2"d Finnish Conference of Neurolinguistics, Publications de l'Association Finlandaise de Linguistique Appliquee (AFinLa), 42, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlsén, E. (1985b). Discourse Patterns in Aphasia. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics S. Göteborg University: Department of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson L.G., & Hjelmquist E.(Eds.), Communication and Handicap: Aspects of Psychological Compensation and Technical Aids (pp. 215–232). Amsterdam: The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi J.(Ed.). Papers from the Eleventh Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Studies in Languages 14 (pp. 292–309). University of Joensuu, Faculty of Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlsén, E. (1991). Body communication and speech in a Wernicke's aphasic: A longitudinal study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 24, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlsén, E. (1993). Conversational principles and aphasic communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlsén, E. (1995). Pragmatics and aphasia - an activity based approach. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 77. Goteborg University, Department of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlsén, E., Allwood, J., & Nivre, J. (2003). Feedback in different social activities. In P. Juel-Henrichsen (Ed.), Nordic Research on Relations Between Utterances. Copenhagen Working Papers in LSP, 3,9–37.
   Google Scholar
• Klein W., & Levelt W.J.M. (Eds.), Crossing the Boundaries in Linguistics (pp. 177–189). Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Allwood, J. (1995). An Activity Based Approach to Pragmatics. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistic, 76. Goteborg University: Department of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Bunt H., & Black B.(Eds.), Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue: Studies in Computational Pragmatics (pp. 47–80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Allwood, J., & Ahlsén, E. (1986). Lexical convergence and language acquisition. In, Papers from the Ninth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics (pp. 15–25). University of Stockholm, Department of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Allwood, J., Strömqvist, S., & Voionmaa, K. (1983). Ecology of Adult Language Acquisition. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 45. Goteborg University: Department of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J.M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1984). Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Beattie, G. W. (1978). Floor appointment and gaze in conversational dyads. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dorriots, B. (1986). How to succeed with only fifty words. Analysis of a role-play in the frame of adult language acquisition. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 52. Goteborg University: Department of Linguistics/The ESF Project on Second Language Acquisition.
   Google Scholar
• Dronkers, N.F., Ludy, C.A., & Redfern, B.B. (1998). Pragmatics in the absence of verbal language: descriptions of a severe aphasic and a language deprived adult. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, 179–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, R.J., & Duffy, J.R. (1981). Three studiesof deficits in pantomime expression and pantomimic recognition in aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 24, 70–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feyereisen, P., & Lannoy, J.-D. (1991). Gestures and Speech: Psychological Investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1973). The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Philadelphia, PA: Lea SE Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research and Social Interaction, 28, 233–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill D. (Ed.), Language and Gesture (pp. 84–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole P., & Morgan J.L. (Eds.), SynB. tax and Semantics, Volume 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Seminar Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., & Ansaldo, A.I. (1999). Clinical note: acquired pragmatic impairments and aphasia. Brain and Language, 68, 529–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill D. (Ed.), Language and Gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker H., & Stemmer B.(Eds.), Handbook of Neurolinguistics (pp. 249–260). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lott, P. (1999). Gesture and Aphasia. Bern: Lang.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill D. (Ed.), Language and Gesture (pp. 312–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mey, J. (1999). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwell P., & James A.(Eds.), The Functional Evaluation of Language Disorders (pp. 97–124). London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, C. (1987). Compensation and language recovery in the chronic aphasic patient. Aphasiology, 1, 235–245.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, C. (1999). Pragmatic assessment and therapy for persons with brain damage: What have clinicians gleaned in two decades? Brain and Language, 68, 535–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, C., & Cleary, J. (1988). Compensatory strategies in the language of closed head injury patients. Brain Injury, 2, 3–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perdue, C. (Ed.) (1993a). Adult Language Acquisition. Cross Linguistic Perspectives, Volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perdue, C. (Ed.) (1993b). Adult Language Acquisition. Cross Linguistic Perspectives, Volume II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, M.R. (1998). Is pragmatics epiphenomenal? Evidence from communication disorders. Journal of Pragmatics, 29, 291–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, M.R. (2001). Compensatory strategies in SLI. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 15, 67–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewlett N.(Eds.), Investigations in clinical Linguistics and Phonetics (pp. 1–14). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, M.R. (2005). Pragmatic ability and disability as emergent phenomena. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, M., & Douglas, M. (2003). Limb apraxia, pantomime, and lexical gesture in aphasic speakers: Preliminary findings. Aphasiology, 17, 453–464. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation, Volumes I and II. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N.N., & Damico, J.S. (1997). Reformulating the definition of compensatory strategies in aphasia. Aphasiology, 11, 761–781.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). http://www.who.int/ classification/icf.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins M., & Howard S.(Eds.), Case Studies in Clinical Linguistics (pp. 271–292). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar