Addressing phonological questions with ultrasound

References

• D. Archangeli, R. Kennedy, A. Baker, S. Racy. 2004. Ultrasound techniques for phonological research. Department of Linguistics Colloquium, University of Arizona
   Google Scholar
• S. Benus. 2005. Dynamics and Transparency in Vowel Harmony., PhD dissertation. USA, New York University
   Google Scholar
• P. Boersma, D. Weenink. 2004. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (v. 4.2), Computer program, available at: http://www.praat.org
   Google Scholar
• E. Broselow, D. Finer. 1991. Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research, 7: 35–59
   Google Scholar
• C. Browman, L. Goldstein. 1990. Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech., In. J. Kingston, M. Beckman, (Eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• C. Browman, L. Goldstein. 1992. “Targetless” schwa: an articulatory analysis., In. G. Docherty, D. R. Ladd, (Eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, Segment, Prosody. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• J. C. Catford. 1977. Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press
   Google Scholar
• R. Casali. 1998. Resolving Hiatus. New York and London, Garland Publishing
   Google Scholar
• L. Davidson. forthcoming. Phonology, phonetics, or frequency influences on the production of non‐native sequences. Journal of Phonetics
   Google Scholar
• E. Flemming. 2004. Contrast and perceptual distinctiveness., In. B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, D. Steriade, (Eds.), The Phonetic Bases of Markedness. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• M. Fourakis. 1991. Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction on tongue position in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90: 1816–1827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gafos. 2002. A grammar of gestural coordination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20: 269–337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Gay. 1978. Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63: 223–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Gick, I. Wilson. forthcoming. Excrescent schwa and vowel laxing: Cross‐linguistic responses to conflicting articulatory targets., In. Papers in Laboratory Phonology VIII. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• A. S. House, G. Fairbanks. 1953. The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25: 105–113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Iskarous. 1998. Vowel Dynamics and Vowel Phonology., In. S. Kimary, S. Blake, E.‐S. Kim, (Eds.), The Proceedings of the Seventeenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Palo Alto, CA, CSLI
   Google Scholar
• J. Kingston, M. (Eds.). Beckman. 1990. Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Y. Kondo. 1994. Targetless schwa: is that how we get the impression of stress‐timing in English?. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Linguistics Department Conference '94. 63–76, Edinburgh, Theoretical and Applied Linguistics Department, University of Edinburgh
   Google Scholar
• M. Li, C. Kambhamettu, M. Stone. 2003. Snake for band edge extraction and Its applications., Paper presented at 6th IASTED International Conference on Computers, Graphics, and Imaging, August.
   Google Scholar
• M. Li, C. Kambhamettu, M. Stone. 2005. Automatic contour tracking in ultrasound images. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19: 545–554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Lindblom. 1963. Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35: 1773–1781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.‐J. Moon, B. Lindblom. 1994. Interaction between duration, context and speaking style in English stressed vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96: 40–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Parthasarathy, M. Stone, J. Prince. 2003. Spatiotemporal visualiztion of the tongue surface using ultrasound and kriging., In. R. Jr. Galloway, (Ed.), Proceedings of SPIE‐Medical Imaging, vol 5029, Bellingham, WA, International Society for Optical Engineering
   Google Scholar
• V. Parthasarathy, M. Stone, J. Prince. 2005. Spatiotemporal visualization of the tongue surface using ultrasound and kriging (surfaces). Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19: 529–544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Perkell. 1969. Physiology of Speech Production: Results and Implications of a Quantitative Cineradiographic Study. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• J. Perkell, M. Cohen, M. Svirsky, M. Matthies, I. Garabieta, M. Jackson. 1992. Electro‐magnetic midsagittal articulometer (EMMA) systems for transducing speech articulatory movements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92: 3078–3096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Pierrehumbert, M. Beckman, D. R. Ladd. forthcoming. Conceptual foundations of phonology as a laboratory science., In. N. Burton‐Robert, P. Carr, G. Docherty, (Eds.), Phonological Knowledge: Its Nature and Status. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• K. Stevens. 1998. Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• M. Stone. 2005. A guide to analysing tongue motion from ultrasound images. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19: 455–501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Stone, E. P. Davis. 1995. A head and transducer support system for making ultrasound images of tongue/jaw movement. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98: 3107–3112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Tarone. 1987. Some influences on the syllable structure of interlanguage phonology., In. G. Ioup, S. Weinberger, (Eds.), Interlanguage Phonology: The Acquisition of a Second Language Sound System. Cambridge, Newbury House Publishers
   Google Scholar
• R. van Son, L. Pols. 1992. Formant movements in Dutch vowels in a text, read at normal and fast rate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92: 121–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Zsiga. 1995. An acoustic and electropalatographic study of lexical and post‐lexical palatalization in American English., In. B. Connell, A. Arvaniti, (Eds.), Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV. 282–302, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar