Influence of listening conditions and listener characteristics on intelligibility of dysarthric speech

References

• Barkmeier J. M., Jordan L. S., Robin D. A., Schum R. L. Inexperienced listener ratings of dysarthric speaker intelligibility and physical appearance. Dysarthria and apraxia of speech: Perspectives on management, C Moore, K Yorkston. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1991; 65–75
   Google Scholar
• Benki J. Analysis of English nonsense syllable recognition in noise. Folia Phoniatrica 2003; 60: 129–157
   Google Scholar
• Bishop D. 1989, Test for the reception of grammar, first edition, available from the author
   Google Scholar
• Burda A. N., Hageman C. F. Perception of accented speech by residents in assisted‐living facilities. Journal of Medical Speech‐Language Pathology 2005; 13: 7–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burda A. N., Scherz J. A., Hageman C. F., Edwards H. T. Age and understanding speakers with Spanish or Taiwanese accents. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2003; 97: 11–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHABA (Committee on hearing bioacoustics and biomechanics). Speech understanding and ageing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1988; 83: 859–895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagenais P., Garcia J., Watts C. Acceptability and intelligibility of mildly impaired dysarthric speech by different listeners. Neuromotor speech disorders: Nature, assessment and management, M Cannito, K Yorkston, D Beukelman. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1998; 229–240
   Google Scholar
• Dagenais P. A., Watts C. R., Turnage L. M., Kennedy S. Intelligibility and acceptability of moderately dysarthric speech by three types of listeners. Journal of Medical Speech‐Language Pathology 1999; 7: 91–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaul R., Kent R. D. A longitudinal case study of ALS: Effects of listener familiarity and proficiency on intelligibility judgments. American Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology 2000; 9: 230–240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia J. M., Cannito M. P. Influence of verbal and nonverbal contexts on the sentence intelligibility of a speaker with dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1996; 39: 750–760
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcia J. M., Hayden M. Young and older listener understanding of a person with severe dysarthria. Journal of Medical Speech‐Language Pathology 1999; 7: 109–112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan V., Markham D. Acoustic‐phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2004; 116: 3108–3118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoehn M., Yahr M. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 1967; 17: 427–442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L., Watson B., Christensen L., Cokely C., Halling D., Lee L. Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1994; 37: 465–474
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hustad K. Estimating the intelligibility of speakers with dysarthria. Folia Phoniatrica 2006; 58: 217–228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad K. C. Unfamiliar listeners' evaluation of speech supplementation strategies for improving the effectiveness of severely dysarthric speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2001; 17: 213–220
   Google Scholar
• Hustad K. C., Cahill M. A. Effects of presentation mode and repeated familiarization on intelligibility of dysarthric speech. American Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology 2003; 12: 198–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad K. C., Gearhart K. J. Listener attitudes toward individuals with cerebral palsy who use speech supplementation strategies. American Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology 2004; 13: 168–181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones W., Mathy P., Azuma T., Liss J. Effect of ageing and synthetic topic cures on the intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Alternative and Augmentive Communication 2004; 20: 22–29
   Google Scholar
• Kent R., Weismer G., Kent J., Rosenbek J. Toward phonetic intelligibility testing in dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1989; 54: 482–499
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim S., Frisina R. D., Mapes F. M., Hickman E. D., Frisina D. R. Effect of age on binaural speech intelligibility in normal hearing adults. Speech Communication 2006; 48: 591–597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King J. M., Gallegos‐Santillan P. Strategy use by speakers with dysarthria and both familiar and unfamiliar conversational partners. Journal of Medical Speech‐Language Pathology 1999; 7: 113–116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liss J. M., Spitzer S. M., Caviness J. N., Adler C. The effects of familiarization on intelligibility and lexical segmentation in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2002; 112: 3022–3030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahendra N., Bayles K. A., Tomoeda C. K. Effect of an unfamiliar accent on the repetition ability of normal elders and individuals with Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology 1999; 7: 223–230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham D., Hazan V. The effect of talker and listener related factors on intelligibility for a real word open‐set perception test. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 2004; 47: 725–737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazelova J., Popelar J., Syka J. Auditory function in presbycusis: peripheral vs central changes. Experimental Gerontology 2003; 38: 87–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavetti N. Scaling procedures for the measurement of speech intelligibility. Intelligibility in speech disorders, R Kent. Benjamins, Amsterdam 1992; 11–34
   Google Scholar
• Spitzer S. M., Liss J. M., Caviness J. N., Adler C. An exploration of familiarization effects in the perception of hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthric speech. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology 2000; 8: 285–293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjaden K., Liss J. M. The influence of familiarity on judgments of treated speech. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology 1995; 4: 39–48
   Google Scholar
• Weismer G., Jeng J.‐Y., Laures J. S., Kent R. D., Kent J. F. Acoustic and intelligibility characteristics of sentence production in neurogenic speech disorders. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 2001; 53: 1–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weismer G., Martin R. Acoustic and perceptual approaches to the study of intelligibility. Intelligibility in Speech Disorders, R Kent. Benjamins, Amsterdam 1992; 67–118
   Google Scholar
• Weiss L. Speech intelligibility in quiet and noise environments with the speech Enhancer (TM) amplification and natural speech. Journal of Medical Speech‐Language Pathology 2002; 10: 327–331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox K., Morris S. Children's speech intelligibility measure. The Psychological Corporation, Tuscon, AZ 1999
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston K., Beukelman D. Assessment of intelligibility in dysarthric speech. CC Publications, Tigard, OR 1981
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston K. M., Beukelman D. R. A comparison of techniques for measuring intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Journal of Communication Disorders 1978; 11: 499–512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston K., Beukelman D. A clinician‐judged technique for quantifying dysarthric speech based on single‐word intelligibility. Journal of Communication Disorders 1980; 13: 15–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar