Affective prosody in children with Williams syndrome

References

• Beeghly M., Cicchetti D. An organizational approach to symbolic development in children with Down syndrome. New Directions for Child Development 1987; 36: 5–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bellugi U., Linchtenberger L., Lai Z., St.George M. The neurocognitive profile of Williams Syndrome: A complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000; 12((Suppl.))7–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellugi U., Wang P. P., Jernigan T. L. Williams Syndrome: An unusual neuropsychological profile. Atypical cognitive deficits in developmental disorders: Implication for brain function, S. H Broman, J Grafman. Erlbaum Press, Hillsdale, NJ 1994; 23–56
   Google Scholar
• Bishop D. Test for the reception of grammar. Harcourt Assessment, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Catterall C., Howard S., Stojanovik V., Szczerbinski M., Wells B. Investigating prosodic ability in Williams Syndrome. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2006; 20: 531–538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church R., Burnhardt B., Shi R., Pichora‐Fuller K. Infant‐directed speech: Final syllable lengthening and rate of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2005; 117: 2429–2430
   Google Scholar
• Clahsen H., Almazan M. Syntax and morphology in Williams Syndrome. Cognition 1998; 68: 167–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen H., Almazan M. Compounding and inflection in language impairment: Evidence from Williams syndrome (and SLI). Lingua 2001; 111: 729–757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement C. J., Wijnen F. Acquisition of vowel contrasts in Dutch. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1994; 37: 83–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cruttenden A. Intonation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1986
   Google Scholar
• Curtiss S. Genie: A psycholinguistic study of a modern‐day ‘Wild‐child’. Academic Press, New York 1977
   Google Scholar
• Frangistakis J. M., Ewart A. K., Morris C. A., Mervis C. B., Bertrand J., Robinson B. F., et al. LIM‐ kinase hemizygosity implicated in impaired visuospatial constructive cognition. Cell 1996; 86: 59–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant J., Valian V., Karmiloff‐Smith A. A study of relative clauses in Williams Syndrome. Journal of Child Language 2002; 29: 403–416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmiloff‐Smith A. Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1998; 2: 389–398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmiloff‐Smith A., Brown J. H., Grice S., Paterson S. J. Dethroning the myth: cognitive dissociations and innate modularity in Williams Syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology 2003; 23: 227–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmiloff‐Smith A., Grant J., Berthoud I., Davies M., Howlin P., Udwin O. How intact is “intact”?. Child Development 1997; 68: 246–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korenberg J., Chen X‐N., Hirota H., Lai Z., Bellugi U., Burian D., Roe B., Matsuoka R. Genome structure and cognitive map of Williams Syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences 2000; 12: 89–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laws G., Bishop D. Pragmatic language impairment and social deficits in Williams syndrome: A comparison with Down's syndrome and specific language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2004; 39: 45–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenneberg E. H. Biological foundations of language. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York 1967
   Google Scholar
• Mayer M. Frog, where are you?. Dial, New York 2003
   Google Scholar
• Mervis C. B., Bertrand J. Developmental relations between cognition and language: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Communication and language acquisition: Discoveries from atypical development, L. B Adamson, M. A Romsky. Paul Brookes Publishing, Baltimore, MD 1997; 75–160
   Google Scholar
• Mervis C. B., Morris C. A., Bertrand J., Robinson B. F. Williams syndrome: Findings from an integrated programme of research. Neurodevelopmental disorders, H Tager‐Flusberg. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1999; 65–110
   Google Scholar
• Murray I. R., Arnott J. L. Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: A review of the literature on human vocal emotion. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1993; 93: 1097–1108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzi T., Paterson S. J., Karmiloff‐Smith A. Word segmentation by infants with Williams syndrome. Infancy 2003; 4: 251–271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan F. Intonation equivalence: an experimental evaluation of pitch scales. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona 2003; 771–774
   Google Scholar
• Paterson S. J., Brown J. H., Gsodl M. K., Johnson M. H., Karmiloff‐Smith A. Cognitive modularity and genetic disorders. Science 1999; 286: 2355–2358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppé S., McCann J., Gibbon F. Profiling Elements of Prosodic Systems‐ Children (PEPS‐C). Queen Margaret University College, Edinburgh 2003
   Google Scholar
• Pezzini G., Vicari S., Volterra V., Milani L., Ossella M. T. Children with Williams Syndrome: Is there a single neuropsychological profile?. Developmental Neuropsychology 1999; 15: 141–155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven J. Coloured Progressive Matrices. Harcourt Publishers, London 1982
   Google Scholar
• Reilly J., Klima E. S., Bellugi U. Once more with feeling: affect and language in atypical populations. Development and Psychopathology 1990; 2: 367–391
   Google Scholar
• Stevens S. S. Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. John Wiley, New York 1975
   Google Scholar
• Stoel‐Gammon C., Herrington P. B. Vowel systems of normally developing and phonologically disordered children. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1990; 4: 145–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojanovik V. Social interaction deficits and conversational inadequacy in Williams syndrome. Journal of Neurolinguistics 2006; 19: 157–173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojanovik V., Perkins M. R., Howard S. Williams Syndrome and Specific Language Impairment do not support claims for developmental double dissociations and innate modularity. Journal of Neurolinguistics 2004; 17: 403–424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojanovik V., Setter J., van Ewijk L. Intonation abilities of children with Williams syndrome: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research in press
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Udwin O., Yule W. Expressive language of children with Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics 1990; 6((Suppl.))108–114
   Google Scholar
• Udwin O., Yule W. A cognitive and behavioural phenotype in Williams Syndrome. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1991; 32: 129–141
   Google Scholar
• Wells B., Peppé S. Intonation within a psycholinguistic framework. Children's speech and literacy difficulties 2: Identification and intervention, J Stackhouse, B Wells. Whurr, London 2001; 366–395
   Google Scholar
• Wells B., Peppé S. Intonation abilities of children with speech and language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2003; 46: 5–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells B., Peppé S., Goulandris N. Intonation development from five to thirteen. Journal of Child Language 2004; 31: 749–778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wightman C. W., Shattuck‐Hufnagel S., Ostendorf M., Price P. J. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1992; 91: 1707–1717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada J. E. Laura – a case for the modularity of language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1990
   Google Scholar