Patterns of syntactic development in children with Williams syndrome and Down's syndrome: Evidence from passives and wh‐questions

References

• Avrutin S. Comprehension of discourse‐linked and non‐discourse‐linked questions by children and Broca's aphasics. Language and Brain, Y Grodinsky, L Shapiro, D Swinney. Academy Press, New York 2000
   Google Scholar
• Baker N. D., Nelson K. E. Recasting and related conversational techniques for triggering syntactic advances by young children. First Language 1984; 5: 3–22
   Google Scholar
• Bartke S. Passives in German children with Williams syndrome. Williams Syndrome across languages, S Bartke, J Siegmuller. Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA 2004; 345–370
   Google Scholar
• Bellugi U., Marks S., Bihrle A., Sabo H. Dissociation between language and cognitive functions in Williams Syndrome. Language development in exceptional circumstances, D Bishop, K Mogford. Churchill Livingstone, London 1988; 177–189
   Google Scholar
• Bellugi U., Bihrle A., Jernigan T., Trauner D., Doherty S. Neuropsychological and neuroanatomical profile of Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics 1990; 6: 115–125
   Google Scholar
• Bellugi U., Bihrle A., Neville H., Doherty S. Language, cognition and brain organization in a neurodevelopmental disorder. Developmental behavioral neuroscience: The Minnesota symposium, M Gunnar, C Nelson. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 1992; 201–232
   Google Scholar
• Bellugi U., Wang P., Jernigan T. L. Williams syndrome: An unusual neuropsychological profile. Atypical cognitive deficits in developmental disorders: Implications for brain function, S. H Broman, J Grafman. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 1994; 23–56
   Google Scholar
• Bellugi U., Lichtenberger L., Jones W., Lai Z., St.George M. The neurocognitive profile of Williams Syndrome: A complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000; 12((Suppl.))7–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop D. Test for the reception of grammar. Medical Research Council, London 1982
   Google Scholar
• Bishop D. Test for reception of grammar, version 2. Medical Research Council, London 2003, London: Psychological Corporation
   Google Scholar
• Borer H., Wexler K. The maturation of syntax. Paremeter setting, T Roeper, E Williams. Reidel, Dordrecht 1987
   Google Scholar
• Botting N. Non‐verbal cognitive development and language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2005; 46: 317–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock J. Language abilities in William Syndrome: a critical review. Development and Psychopathology 2007; 19: 97–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown R. A first language: The early stages. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1973
   Google Scholar
• Cairns H., Hsu J. R. Who, why, when, and how; a developmental study. Journal of Child Language 1978; 5: 477–488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman R. S. Language development in children and adolescents with Down syndrome. Handbook of child language, P Fletcher, B MacWhinney. Blackwell, Oxford 1995; 641–663
   Google Scholar
• Chapman R. S., Seung H. K., Schwartz S. E., Kay‐Raining Bird E. Language skills of children and adolescents with Down syndrome: II. Production deficits. Journal of speech, language and hearing research 1998; 41: 861–873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1965
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N. Lectures on government and binding. Foris, Dordrecht 1981
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N. The minimalist program. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1995
   Google Scholar
• Clahsen H., Almazan M. Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome. Cognition 1998; 68: 167–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen H., Almazan M. Compounding and inflection in language impairment: Evidence from Williams syndrome (and SLI). Lingua 2001; 111: 729–757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen H., Temple C. Words and rules in children with Williams syndrome. Language competence across populations, Y Levy, J Schaeffer. Erlbaum Press, Mahwah, NJ 2003; 23–352
   Google Scholar
• Clahsen H., Ring M., Temple C. Lexical and morphological skills in English‐speaking children with Williams syndrome. Williams syndrome across languages, S Bartke, J Siegmüller. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA 2004; 221–244
   Google Scholar
• Conti‐Ramsden G., Botting N., Faragher B. Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2001; 42: 741–748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain S. Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1991; 14: 597–650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Villiers J., de Villiers P. Development of the use of word order in comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1973; 2: 331–342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd B. A comparison of the phonological systems of mental age matched normal, severely abnormal and Down's syndrome children. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1976; 11: 27–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donnai D., Karmiloff‐Smith A. William syndrome: from genotype through to the cognitive phenotype. American Journal of Medical Genetics 2000; 97: 164–171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs M. P. The hearing of Down's individuals. Seminars in Speech, Language and Hearing 1980; 1: 25–37
   Google Scholar
• Ebbels S. H. Teaching grammar to school‐aged children with specific language impairment using shape coding. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 2007; 23: 67–93
   Google Scholar
• Ebbels S. H., van der Lely H. Meta‐syntactic therapy using visual coding for children with severe persistent SLI. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2001; 36((Suppl.))345–350
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards S., Salis C. Discourse linking, canonicity and comprehension of wh‐questions in agrammatism. Brain and Language 2005; 95: 86–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewart A. K., Morris C. A., Atkinson D., Jin W., Sternes K., Spallone P., Stock A. D., Leppert M., Keating M. T. Hemizygosity at the elastin gene locus in a developmental disorder, Williams syndrome. Nature Genetics 1993; 5: 11–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor J. The modularity of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1983
   Google Scholar
• Fowler A. Language abilities in children with Down syndrome: evidence for a specific syntactic delay. Children with Down syndrome: a developmental perspective, D Cicchetti, M Beeghly. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990; 302–328
   Google Scholar
• Fowler A. Linguistic variability in persons with Down syndrome. Down syndrome: living and learning in the community, L Nadel, D Rosenthal. Wiley‐Liss, New York 1995; 121–131
   Google Scholar
• Fowler A. Language in mental retardation: Associations with and dissociations from general cognition. Handbook of mental retardation and development, J. A Burack, R. M Hodapp, E Zigler. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA 1998; 290–333
   Google Scholar
• Fowler A., Gelman R., Gleitman L. The course of language learning in children with Down syndrome. Constraints on language acquisition: Studies of atypical children, H Tager‐Flusberg. LEA, Hillsdale, NJ 1994; 91–140
   Google Scholar
• Fox D., Grodzinsky Y. Children's passive: a view from the by‐phrase. Linguistic Inquiry 1998; 29: 311–332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromkin V. Some thoughts about the brain/mind/language interface. Lingua 1997; 100: 3–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant J., Valian V., Karmiloff‐Smith A. A study of relative clauses in Williams syndrome. Journal of Child Language 2002; 29: 403–416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg F. Introduction. American Journal of Medical Genetics 1990; 6((Suppl.))85–88
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky Y. The neurology of syntax. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000; 23: 1–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guasti M. T. Language acquisition. The growth of grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 2002
   Google Scholar
• Hick R., Botting N., Conti‐Ramsden G. Cognitive abilities in children with specific language impairment: consideration of visuo‐spatial skills. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2005; 40: 137–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickock G., Avrutin S. Representation, referentiality and processing in agrammatic comprehension: two case studies. Brain and Language 1995; 50: 10–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hook E. B. Rates of chromosome abnormalities at different maternal ages. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1981; 58: 282–285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan D. M. The development of the full passive. Journal of Child Language 1978; 5: 65–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackendoff R. Languages of the mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1992
   Google Scholar
• Jackendoff R. The architecture of the language faculty. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1997
   Google Scholar
• Jarrold C., Baddeley A., Hewes A. Verbal and nonverbal abilities in the Williams syndrome phenotype: Evidence for diverging developmental trajectories. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 1998; 39: 511–523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrold C., Baddeley A., Hewes A. Genetically dissociated components of working memory: Evidence from Down's and Williams syndrome. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 637–651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe V. L., Varlokosta S. Language abilities in William Syndrome: Exploring comprehension, production and repetition. Advances in Speech‐Language Pathology 2007; 9(2)1–13
   Google Scholar
• Joffe V. L., Varlokosta S. 2007; 1–13, Vol 9, No 2
   Google Scholar
• Johnston J. Cognitive deficits in specific language impairments: decisions in spite of uncertainty. Journal of Speech, language‐Language Pathology and Audiology 1999; 23: 165–172
   Google Scholar
• Karmiloff‐Smith A. Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Science 1998; 2: 389–398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmiloff‐Smith A., Grant J., Berthoud I., Davis M., Howlin P., Udwin O. Language and Williams syndrome: How intact is “intact”?. Child Development 1997; 68: 274–290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmiloff‐Smith A., Tyler L. L., Voice K., Sims K., Udwin O., Howlin P., Davies M. Linguistic dissociations in Williams syndrome: Evaluating receptive syntax in on‐line and off‐line tasks. Neuropsychologia 1998; 36: 343–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmiloff‐Smith A., Brown J. H., Grice S., Peterson S. Dethroning the myth: Cognitive dissociations and innate modularity in Williams syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology 2003; 23: 227–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmiloff‐Smith A., Ansari D., Campbell L., Scerif G., Thomas M. Theoretical implications of studying cognitive development in genetic disorders: the case of Williams‐Beuren syndrome. Williams‐Beuren Syndrome: Research and Clinical Perspectives, C Morris, H Lenhoff, P Wang. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD 2006; 254–273
   Google Scholar
• Korenberg J., Chen X. N., Hirota H., Lai Z., Bellugi U., Burian D., Roe B., Matsuoka R. Genome structure and cognitive map of Williams syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000; 12((Suppl. 1))89–107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laws G., Bishop D. A comparison of language abilities in adolescents with Down syndrome and children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, language and Hearing Research 2003; 46: 1324–1339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejeune J., Turpin R., Gautier M. Le mongolisme. Premier example d'aberration autosomique humaine. Annales de génétique, Paris, 1958/1959 1959; 1: 41–49
   Google Scholar
• Leonard L. Children with specific language impairment. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Levy Y., Kave G. Language breakdown and linguistic theory: A tutorial overview. Lingua 1999; 107: 95–113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maratsos M. How preschool children understand missing complement sentences. Child Development 1974; 45: 700–706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayeux R., Kandel E. R. Disorders of language: the aphasias. Principles of Neural Science, E Kandel, J. H Schwartz, T. M Jessel. Elsevier, New York 1991; 839–851
   Google Scholar
• Mervis C. B. Language abilities in Williams‐Beuren Syndrome: A review. Williams‐Beuren syndrome: Research, evaluation and treatment, C. A Morris, H. M Lenhoff, P. P Wang. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD 2006; 159–206
   Google Scholar
• Mervis C. B., Morris C. A., Bertrand J., Robinson B. F. William syndrome: Findings from an integrated programme of research. Neurodevelopmental disorders: Contributions to a new framework from cognitive neuroscience, H Tager‐Flusberg. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1999; 65–110
   Google Scholar
• Mervis C. B., Klein‐Tasman B. P. Williams syndrome: Cognition, personality, and adaptive behaviour. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 2000; 6: 148–158
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mervis C. B., Robinson B. R., Rowe M. L., Becerra A., Klein‐Tasman B. P. Language abilities of individuals who have Williams syndrome. International review of research in mental retardation, L Abbeduto. Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA 2003; vol. 27: 35–81
   Google Scholar
• Mervis C. B., Robinson B. R., Rowe M. L., Becerra A., Klein‐Tasman B. P. Relations between language and cognition in Williams syndrome. Williams Syndrome across languages, S Bartke, J Siegmuller. Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA 2004; 63–92
   Google Scholar
• Mutton D., Alberman E., Hook E. B., (for The National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register and the Association of Clinical Cytogeneticists). Cytogenetic and epidemiological findings in Down syndrome, England and Wales 1989 to 1993. Journal of Medical Genetics 1996; 33: 387–394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson K. E. Facilitating children's syntax acquisition. Developmental Psychology 1977; 13: 101–107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norbury C. F., Bishop D. V. M., Briscoe J. Does impaired grammatical comprehension provide evidence for an innate grammar module?. Applied Psycholinguistics 2002; 23: 247–268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perovic A. Binding principles in Down syndrome. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2001; 13: 425–445
   Google Scholar
• Perovic A. Language in Down syndrome: Delay of principle A effect?. Durham Working Papers in Linguistics 2002; 8: 97–110
   Google Scholar
• Piaget J., Inhelder B. The psychology of the child. Basic Books, New York 1969
   Google Scholar
• Pinker S. Rules of language. Science 1991; 253: 530–535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker S. The language instinct. William Morrow & Company, New York 1994
   Google Scholar
• Pinker S. Words and rules. Weidenfiled and Nicolson, London 1999
   Google Scholar
• Ring M., Clahsen H. Distinct patterns of language impairment in Down's syndrome and Williams syndrome: The case of syntactic chains. Journal of Neurolinguistics 2005; 18: 479–501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondal J. A. Exceptional language development in Down syndrome: implications for the cognition‐language relationship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995
   Google Scholar
• Rossen M. L., Klima E. S., Bellugi U., Bihrle A., Jones W. Interaction between language and cognition: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Language, learning, and behavior disorders: Developmental, biological, and clinical perspectives, J. H Beitchman, N Cohen, M Konstantareas, R Tannock. Cambridge University Press, New York 1996; 367–392
   Google Scholar
• Schaner‐Wolles C. Spared domain‐specific cognitive capacities? Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome and Down syndrome. Williams syndrome across languages, S Bartke, J Siegmüller. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA 2004; 93–124
   Google Scholar
• Shallice T. From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1988
   Google Scholar
• Slobin D. Psycholinguistics. Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL 1974
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakaki S. Wh‐questions in Greek children with William syndrome. A comparison with SLI and normal development. Williams Syndrome across languages, S Bartke, J Siegmüller. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA 2004; 295–318
   Google Scholar
• Stojanovik V., Perkins M., Howard S. Language and conversational abilities in Williams syndrome: How good is good?. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2001; 36((Suppl.))234–240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stojanovik V., Perkins M., Howard S. Williams syndrome and specific language impairment do not support claims for developmental double associations and innate modularity. Journal of Neurolinguistics 2004; 17: 403–424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromme P., Bjornstad G. P., Ramstad K. Prevalence estimation of Williams syndrome. Journal of Child Neurology 2002; 17: 269–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromswold K. The acquisition of subject and object WH‐question. Language Acquisition 1995; 4: 5–48
   Google Scholar
• Tait M. E., Thompson C. K., Ballard K. J. Subject‐object asymmetries in agrammatic comprehension of four types of wh‐questions. Brain and Language 1995; 51: 77–79
   Google Scholar
• Tager‐Flusberg H., Sullivan K. Early language development in children with mental retardation. Handbook of mental retardation and development, J. A Burack, R. M Hodapp, E Zigler. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998; 208–239
   Google Scholar
• Thomas M., Grant J., Barham Z., Gsodl M., Laing E., Lakusta L., Tyler L., Grice S., Paterson S., Karmiloff‐Smith A. Past tense formation in Williams syndrome. Language and Cognitive Processes 2001; 16: 143–176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton R. Adventures in long‐distance moving: the acquisition of complex wh‐questions. University of Connecticut. 1990, Doctoral Dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Tyack D., Ingram D. Children's production and comprehension of questions. Journal of Child Language 1977; 4: 211–224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valian V., Casey L. Young children's acquisition of wh‐questions: the role of structured input. Journal of child language 2003; 30: 117–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. Specifically language impaired and normally developing children: Verbal passive vs. adjectival passive sentence interpretation. Lingua 1996a; 98: 243–272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. The test of active and passive sentences (TAPS). Centre for Developmental Language Disorders and Cognitive Neuroscience, UCL, London 1996b
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. Language and cognitive development in a grammatical SLI boy: Modularity and innateness. Journal of Neurolinguistics 1997; 10: 75–107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. SLI in children. Movement, economy and deficits in the computational syntactic system. Language Acquisition 1998; 72: 161–192
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. Learning from grammatical SLI. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999; 8: 286–288
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. Domain‐specific cognitive systems: insight from grammatical – SLI. Trends in cognitive sciences 2005; 9((2))53–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H., Stollwerck L. Binding theory and grammatical specific language impairment in children. Cognition 1997; 62: 245–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H., Ullman M. T. Past tense morphology in specifically language impaired and normally developing children. Language and Cognitive Processes 2001; 16: 177–217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H., Battell J. Wh‐movement in children with grammatical SLI: A test of the RDDR hypothesis. Language 2003; 79: 153–181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H., Rosen S., Adlard A. Grammatical language impairment and the specificity of cognitive domains: relations between auditory and language abilities. Cognition 2004; 94: 167–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varlokosta S. Test for the elicitation and comprehension of wh‐questions in Greek. University of the Aegean. 2004, Unpublished experimental results
   Google Scholar
• Vicari S., Caselli M., Tonucci F. Asynchrony of lexical and morphosyntactic development in children with Down syndrome. Neuropsychologia 2000; 24: 138–149
   Google Scholar
• Volterra V., Capirci O., Pezzini G., Sabbadini L., Vicari S. Linguistic abilities in Italian children with Williams syndrome. Cortex 1996; 32: 663–677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volterra V., Caselli M. C., Capirci O., Tonucci F., Vicari S. Early linguistic abilities of Italian children with Williams syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology 2003; 23: 33–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volterra V., Capirci O., Caselli M. C., Vicari S. Language in preschool Italian children with Williams and Down syndromes. Williams syndrome across languages, S Bartke, J Siegmüller. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA 2004; 163–185
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky L. S. Thought and Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1962
   Google Scholar
• Wang P. P., Bellugi U. Evidence from two genetic syndromes for a dissociation between verbal and visual‐spatial short‐term memory. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1994; 16: 317–322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler intelligence scale for children. The Psychological Corporation, Sidcup 1992, third edition
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler preschool and primary scales of intelligence‐revised. The Psychological Corporation, Sidcup 1990
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm A., Hanna K. On the acquisition of wh‐questions. Galgary Working Papers in Linguistics 1992; 15: 89–98
   Google Scholar
• Williams J., Barrett‐Boyes B., Lowe J. Supravalvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 1961; 14: 186–190
   Google Scholar
• Zukowski A. Uncovering grammatical competence in children with Williams syndrome. Boston University. 2001, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar