Complex grammar in Williams syndrome

References

• Avrutin S., Wexler K. Development of Principle B in Russian: Coindexation at LF and coreference. Language Acquisition 1992; 2: 259–306
   Google Scholar
• Bellugi M. S., Marks S., Bihrle A., Sabo H. Dissociation between language and cognitive functions in Williams syndrome. Language Development in Exceptional Circumstances, D Bishop, K Mogford. Churchill, London 1988; 177–189
   Google Scholar
• Borer H., Wexler K. The maturation of syntax. Parameter Setting, T Roeper, E Williams. Reidel, Dordrecht 1987; 123–172
   Google Scholar
• Borer H., Wexler K. Bi‐unique relations and the maturation of grammatical principles. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1992; 10: 147–189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien Y.‐C., Wexler K. Children's knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition 1990; 1: 225–295
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N. Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht 1981
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, R Martin, D Michaels, J Uriagereka. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N. Derivation by phase. Ken Hale: A Life in Language, M Kenstowicz. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 2001; 1–52
   Google Scholar
• Clahsen H., Almazan M. Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome. Cognition 1998; 68: 167–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froud K., Tsakali V., Wexler K. Comprehension of English raising constructions in normally developing children. MIT. 2002, Manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Froud K., Wexler K., Tsakali V. Comprehension of English subject raising constructions by normally developing children. MIT mss., Department of Brain and Cognitive Science. 2005
   Google Scholar
• Gordon P., Chafetz J. Verb‐based vs. class‐based accounts of actionality effects in children's comprehension of the passive. Cognition 1990; 36: 227–254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky Y., Reinhart T. The Innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 1993; 24: 69–101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch C., Wexler K. Children's passives and their resulting interpretation. University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics, K. U Deen, J Nomura, B Schulz, B. D Schwartz, 2006; 4: 125–136, The Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition–North America, Honolulu, HI
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch C., Wexler K. The late development of raising: what children seem to think about seem. New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising, W Davies, S Dubinsky. Springer, Heidelberg in press
   Google Scholar
• Hornstein N. Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Blackwell, Oxford 2001
   Google Scholar
• Jakubowicz C. On markedness and binding principles. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society 1984; 14: 154–182
   Google Scholar
• Karmiloff‐Smith A., Tyler L., Voice K., Sims K., Udwin O., Howlin P., Davies M. Linguistic dissociations in Williams syndrome: Evaluating receptive syntax in online and off‐line tasks. Neuropsychologia 1998; 36: 343–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster C. Errors in Anaphora Acquisition. Utrecht University. 1993, PhD Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Maratsos M., Fox D., Becker J., Chalkley M. A. Semantic restrictions on children's passives. Cognition 1985; 19: 167–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee C. A comparison of pronouns and anaphors in Italian and English acquisition. Language Acquisition 1992; 2: 21–54
   Google Scholar
• Mervis C. B. Language abilities in Williams‐Beuren syndrome. Williams‐Beuren Syndrome: Research, evaluation and treatment, C Morris, H Lenhoff, P Wang. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD 2006
   Google Scholar
• Mervis C. B., Robinson B., Rowe M., Becerra A., Klein‐Tasman B. Relations between language and cognition in Williams syndrome. Williams Syndrome across Languages, S Bartke, J Siegmuller. Benjamins, Amsterdam 2004
   Google Scholar
• Perovic A., Wexler K. New Data on Passives in Williams Syndrome: Evidence for a Grammatical Delay. Paper presented at the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development, USA, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Perovic A., Wexler K. Knowledge of binding, raising and passives in Williams syndrome. University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics, K. U Deen, J Nomura, B Schulz, B. D Schwartz, 2006; 273–284, The Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition–North America, Honolulu, HI
   Google Scholar
• Perovic A., Wexler K. Development of passive in Williams syndrome: Evidence for a grammatical delay. submitted
   Google Scholar
• Perovic A., Modyanova N., Hanson E., Rappaport L., Wexler K. Investigations of Grammar in Autism. Poster presented at the 31st Boston University Conference on Language Development, USA, 2006
   Google Scholar
• Philip W., Coopmans P. The double Dutch Delay of Principle B Effect. Proceedings of the 20^th Boston University Conference on Language Development, A Stringfellow, D Cahana‐Amitay, E Hughes, A Zukowski. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA 1996
   Google Scholar
• Reuland E. Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry 2001; 32: 439–492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ring M., Clahsen H. Distinct patterns of language impairment in Down syndrome, Williams syndrome and SLI: The case of syntactic chains. Journal of Neurolinguistics 2005; 19: 479–501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudhalter V., Braine M. How does comprehension of passives develop? A comparison of actional and experiential verbs. Journal of Child Language 1985; 12: 455–470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lely H. K. J., Stollwerck L. Binding Theory and specifically language impaired children. Cognition 1997; 62: 245–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman H., Hollander M., Schult C. Young children's understanding of thought bubbles and of thought. Child Development 1996; 67: 768–788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler K. Theory of phasal development: Perfection in child grammar. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 2004; 48: 159–209
   Google Scholar
• Wexler K., Chien Y.‐C. The development of lexical anaphors and pronouns. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 1985; 24: 138–149
   Google Scholar
• Zukowski A. Uncovering Grammatical Competence in Children with Williams Syndrome. Boston University. 2001, Doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar