Influence of familiarity on identifying prosodic vocalizations produced by children with severe dysarthria

References

• Adobe® Audition® (Version 1.5) [Computer software]. Adobe Systems Inc, San Jose, CA 2004
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman D. R., Yorkston K. M. Influence of passage familiarity on intelligibility estimates of dysarthric speech. Journal of Communication Disorders 1980; 13: 33–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumberg M. Respiration and speech in the cerebral palsied child. American Journal of Disorders of Childhood 1955; 89: 48–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boersma P., Weenik D. Praat, A system for doing phonetics by computer (Version 3.4) [Computer software]. Technical Report 132, Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam. 2000, Retrieved March, 2005, available online at: http://www.praat.org
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger D. Intonation and its uses: Melody in grammar and discourse. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA 1989
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A. Evaluation of speech production of the hearing impaired: Some benefits of forced‐choice testing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1985; 28: 185–196
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciocca V., Whitehill T., Joan M. K. Y. The impact of cerebral palsy on the intelligibility of pitch‐based linguistic contrasts. Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science 2004; 23: 283–287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darley F., Aronson A. E., Brown J. R. Motor speech disorders. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia 1975
   Google Scholar
• DePaul R., Kent R. D. A longitudinal case study of ALS: effects of listener familiarity and proficiency on intelligibility judgments. American Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology 2000; 9: 230–240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Innocenzo J., Tjaden K., Greenman G. Intelligibility in dysarthria: effects of listener familiarity and speaking condition. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2006; 20: 659–675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dongilli P. Jr. Semantic context and speech intelligibility. Motor speech disorders: Advances in assessment and treatment, J Till, K Yorkston, D Beukelman. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore 1994; 175–191
   Google Scholar
• Ellis L. W., Fucci D. J. Magnitude estimation scaling of speech intelligibility: effects of listeners' experience and semantic‐syntactic context. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1991; 73: 295–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis L. W., Fucci D. J. Effects of listeners' experience on two measures of intelligibility. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1992; 74: 1099–1104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis L. W., Fucci D. J. Sophisticated and naïve listeners' magnitude estimation scaling judgments of speech intelligibility and speech annoyance. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2000; 90: 1231–1234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flipsen P. Speaker‐listener familiarity: parents as judges of delayed speech intelligibility. Journal of Communication Disorders 1995; 28: 3–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy J. C. Cerebral palsy. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1983
   Google Scholar
• Hustad K. C., Cahill M. A. Effects of presentation mode and repeated familiarization on intelligibility of dysarthric speech. American Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology 2003; 12: 198–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques R. D., Rastatter M., Sullivan J. Some effects of congenital spasticity on fundamental frequency. Perceptual Motor Skills 1985; 61: 75–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King J. M., Gallegos‐Santillan P. Strategy use by speakers with dysarthria and both familiar and unfamiliar conversational partners. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology 1999; 7: 113–116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimacka L., Patterson A., Patterson R. Listening to deaf speech: does experience count?. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2001; 36: 210–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman J., Gerratt B. R., Precoda K. Listener experience and perception of voice quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1990; 33: 103–115
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwiatkowski J., Shriberg L. D. Intelligibility assessment in developmental phonological disorders: accuracy of caregiver gloss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1992; 35: 1095–1104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Le Dorze G., Ouellet L., Ryalls J. Intonation and speech rate in dysarthric speech. Journal of Communication Disorders 1994; 27: 1–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehiste I. Suprasegmental features of speech. Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics, N. J Lass. Academic Press, New York 1976; 225–239
   Google Scholar
• Lewis K. E., Watterson T. L., Houghton S. M. The influence of listener experience and academic training on ratings of nasality. Journal of Communication Disorders 2003; 36: 49–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom B. On the communication process: speaker–listener interaction and the development of speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1990; 6: 220–230
   Google Scholar
• Liss J. M., Spitzer S. M., Caviness J. N., Adler C. The effects of familiarization on intelligibility and segmentation in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2002; 112: 3022–3030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarr N. S. The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1983; 26: 451–458
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mencke E. O., Ochsner G. J., Testut E. W. Listener judges and the speech intelligibility of deaf children. Journal of Communication Disorders 1983; 16: 175–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Most T., Weisel A., Lev‐Matezky A. Speech intelligibility and the evaluation of personal qualities by experienced and inexperienced listeners. Volta Review 1996; 98: 181–190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netsell R. Speech physiology. Normal aspects of speech, hearing, and language, F Minifie, T. J Hixon, F Williams. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1973; 211–234
   Google Scholar
• Patel R. Prosody conveys information in severely impaired speech. Proceedings of the European Speech Community Association (ESCA) Workshop of Dialogue and Prosody. 1999; 129–135, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Patel R. Phonatory control in adults with cerebral palsy and severe dysarthria. Alternative & Augmentative Communication 2002; 18: 2–10
   Google Scholar
• Patel R. Acoustic characteristics of the question‐statement contrast in severe dysarthria due to cerebral palsy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2003; 46: 1401–1415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel R. The acoustics of contrastive prosody in adults with cerebral palsy. Journal of Medical Speech‐Language Pathology 2004; 12: 189–193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel R., Salata A. Using computer games to mediate caregiver‐child communication for children with severe dysarthria. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology 2006; 14: 279–284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell T. W., Elbert M., Forrest K. Listeners' familiarity and perception of an idiosyncratic phonological pattern. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1990; 70: 859–864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puyuelo M., Rondal J. A. Speech rehabilitation in 10 Spanish‐speaking children with severe cerebral palsy: a 4‐year longitudinal study. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2005; 8: 113–116
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlenck K., Bettrich R., Willmes K. Aspects of disturbed prosody in dysarthria. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1993; 7: 119–128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattuck‐Hufnagel S., Turk A. E. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1996; 25: 193–247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer S. M., Liss J. M., Caviness J. N., Adler C. An exploration of familiarization effects in the perception of hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthric speech. Journal of Medical Speech‐Language Pathology 2000; 8: 285–293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjaden K. K., Liss J. M. The role of listener familiarity in the perception of dysarthric speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 1995a; 9: 139–154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjaden K. K., Liss J. M. The influence of familiarity on judgments of treated speech. American Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology 1995b; 4: 39–48
   Google Scholar
• Vance J. E. Prosodic deviation in dysarthria: a case study. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 1994; 29: 61–76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wit J., Maassen B., Gabreels F. J. M., Thoonen G. Maximum performance tests in children with developmental spastic dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1993; 36: 452–459
   PubMedGoogle Scholar