Methodological variables in choral reading

References

• Adams M. R., Ramig P. Vocal characteristics of normal speakers and stutterers during choral reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1980; 23: 457–469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews G., Howie P., Dozsa M., Guitar B. Stuttering: Speech pattern characteristics under fluency‐inducing conditions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1982; 25: 208–216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boomsliter P., Creel W., Hastings Jr. G. Perception and English Poetic Meter. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 1973; 88: 200–208
   Google Scholar
• Boutsen F. R., Brutten G. J., Watts C. R. Timing and intensity variability in the metronomic speech of stuttering and nonstuttering speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2000; 43: 513–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown S., Ingham R. J., Ingham J. C., Laird A. R., Fox P. T. Stuttered and fluent speech production: an ALE meta‐analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping 2005; 25: 105–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cool Edit. [Computer software]. Syntrillium Software Corporation, Phoenix, AZ 2000
   Google Scholar
• Cummins F. Prosodic characteristics of synchronous speech. Prosody 2000: Speech Recognition and Synthesis, S Puppel, G Demenko. Adam Mickiewicz University, Krakow 2000; 45–49
   Google Scholar
• Cummins F. On Synchronous Speech. Acoustic Research Letters Online 2002; 3((1))7–11
   Google Scholar
• Cummins F. Practice and performance in speech produced synchronously. Journal of Phonetics 2003; 31: 139–148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox P. T., Ingham R. J., Ingham J. C., Hirsch T. B., Downs J. H., Martin C., Jerabek P., Glass T., Lancaster J. L. A PET study of the neural systems of stuttering. Nature 1996; 382: 158–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman K., Armson J. Extent and stability of stuttering reduction during choral reading. Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology and Audiology 1998; 22: 188–202
   Google Scholar
• Ingham R. J., Carrol P. J. Listener judgment of differences in stutterers' nonstuttered speech during chorus‐ and nonchorus‐reading conditions. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 1977; 20: 293–302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingham R. J., Warner A., Byrd A., Cotton J. Speech effort measurement and stuttering: investigating the chorus reading effect. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2006; 49: 660–670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley J. K., McCauley D. S. Using choral reading to promote language learning for ESL students. The Reading Teacher 1992; 45: 526–533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccinati J. L. Using prosodic cues to teach oral reading fluency. The Reading Teacher 1985; 39: 206–212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Multi‐Speech. (Model 3700) [Computer software]. Kay Elemetrics Corporation, Lincoln Park, NJ 2001
   Google Scholar
• Onslow M., van Doorn J., Newman D. Variability of acoustic segment duration after prolonged‐speech treatment for stuttering. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1992; 35: 529–536
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Packman A., Onslow M., van Doorn R. Linguistic stress and the rhythm effect in stuttering. Speech Production: Motor Control, Brain Research and Fluency Disorders, W Hulstijn, H. F. M Peters, P. H. H. M Van Lieshout. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1997; 473–478
   Google Scholar
• Packman A., Onslow M., Richard F., van Doorn R. Syllabic stress and variability: a model of stuttering. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1996; 10: 235–263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rami M. K., Kalinowski J., Rastatter D. H., Holbert D., Allen M. Choral reading with filtered speech: Effect on stuttering. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2005; 100: 421–431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley G. D., Ingham J. C. Acoustic duration changes associated with two types of treatment for children who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2000; 43: 965–978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPSS for Windows. (Version 14.0.1) [Data analysis software system]. SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL 2005
   Google Scholar
• Stager S. V., Denman D. W., Ludlow C. L. Modifications in aerodynamic variables by persons who stutter under fluency‐evoking conditions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1997; 40: 832–847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A., Kalinowski J., Rastatter M. P., Lynch K. Effect of delayed auditory feedback on normal speakers at two speech rates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2002; 111: 2237–2241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingate M. E. Sound and pattern in artificial fluency: spectrographic evidence. Journal of Fluency Disorders 1981; 6: 95–118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J. C., Maguire G., Riley G., Fallon J., LaCasse L., Chin S., Klein E., Tang C., Cadwell S., Lottenberg S. A positron emission tomography [18F]deoxyglucose study of developmental stuttering. Neuroreport 1995; 6: 501–505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar