Fortition and lenition patterns in the acquisition of obstruents by children with cochlear implants

Reference

• Allen G. D. How the young French child avoids the pre‐voicing problem for word initial voiced stops. Journal of Child Language 1985; 12: 37–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow J. A. Prologue: recent advances in phonological theory and treatment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 2001a; 32: 225–228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow J. A. The structure of /s/‐sequences: evidence from a disordered system. Journal of Child Language 2001b; 28: 291–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow J. A., Dinnsen D. A. Asymmetrical cluster development in a disordered system. Language Acquisition 1998; 7: 1–49
   Google Scholar
• Barlow J. A., Gierut J. A. Optimality theory in phonological acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 1999; 42: 1482–1498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer L. What is lenition?. Journal of Linguistics 1988; 24: 381–392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman M. E., Yoneyama K., Edwards J. Language‐specific and language‐universal aspects of lingual obstruent production in Japanese‐acquiring children. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 2003; 7: 18–28
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt B. H., Stemberger J. P. Handbook of phonological development from the perspective of constraint‐based nonlinear phonology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Blamey P. J., Sarant J., Paatsch L., Barry J., Bow C., Wales R., Wright M., Psarros C., Rattigan K., Tooher R. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2001; 44: 264–285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blevins J. A theoretical synopsis of evolutionary phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 2006; 32: 117–166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma P., Levelt C. Optimality theory and phonological acquisition. Annual Review of Language Acquisition 2003; 3: 1–50
   Google Scholar
• Bollard P. M., Chute P. M., Popp A., Parisier S. C. Specific language growth in young children using the CLARION cochlear implant. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, & Laryngology 1999; 177: 119–123
   Google Scholar
• Boysson‐Bardies B. de., Vihman M. M., Roug‐Hellichius L., Durand C., Landberg I., Arao F. Material evidence of infant selection from the target language: a cross‐linguistic phonetic study. Phonological development: models, research, implications, C. A Ferguson, L Menn, C Stoel‐Gammon. York Press, Timonium, MD 1992; 369–391
   Google Scholar
• Buhler H. C., De Thomasis B., Chute P., DeCora A. An analysis of phonological process use in young children with cochlear implants. Volta Review 2007; 107: 55–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin S. B. The role of the sonority hierarchy in delayed phonological systems. Pathologies of speech and language: contributions of clinical linguistics and phonetics., T. W Powell. International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association, New Orleans, LA 1996; 109–117
   Google Scholar
• Chin S. B. Aspects of stop consonant production by pediatric users of cochlear implants. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 2002; 33: 38–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin S. B. Children's consonant inventories after extended cochlear implant use. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2003; 46: 849–862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin S. B. Realization of complex onsets by pediatric users of cochlear implants. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2006; 20: 501–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin S. B. Constraints on consonant clusters in children with cochlear implants. Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders, D. A Dinnsen, J. A Gierut. Equinox Publishing Ltd, London 2008; 427–447
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1965
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N., Halle M. The sound pattern of English. Harper & Row, New York 1968
   Google Scholar
• Clements G. N. The role of the sonority hierarchy in core syllabification. Papers in laboratory phonology I: between the grammar and physics of speech, J Kingston, M. E Beckman. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990; 283–333
   Google Scholar
• Connor C. M., Hieber S., Arts H. A., Zwolan T. A. Speech, vocabulary, and the education of children using cochlear implants: oral or total communication?. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2000; 43: 1185–1204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cser A. The typology and modelling of obstruent lenition and fortition processes. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2003
   Google Scholar
• Davis K. Phonetic and phonological contrasts in the acquisition of voicing: voice onset time production in Hindi and English. Journal of Child Language 1995; 22: 275–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson P. W., Blamey P. J., Dettman S. J., Barker E. J., Clark G. M. A clinical report on receptive vocabulary skills in cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing 1995; 16: 287–294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth K. Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 1995; 25: 13–25
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen D. A., Barlow J. A. On the characterization of a chain shift in normal and delayed phonological acquisition. Journal of Child Language 1998; 25: 61–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders, D. A Dinnsen, J. A Gierut. Equinox Publishing Ltd, London 2008
   Google Scholar
• Dogil G. Phonetic dimensions of segmental strength. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, J Trouvain, W Barry. Pirrot, Dudweiler 2007; 89–92
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer D. J., Kirk K. I., Sehgal S. T., Riley A. I., Osberger M. J. A comparison of vowel production by children with multichannel cochlear implants or tactile aids: perceptual evidence. Ear and Hearing 1997; 18: 307–315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson C. A. Fricatives in child language. Papers on linguistics and child language: Ruth Hirsch Weir memorial volume, V Honsa, M. J Hardman‐de‐Bautista. Mouton, The Hague 1978; 93–115
   Google Scholar
• Gandour J., Petty S. H., Dardarananda R., Dechongkit S., Mukngoen S. The acquisition of the voicing contrast in Thai: a study of voice onset time in word‐initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language 1986; 13: 561–572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geffner D. Feature characteristics of spontaneous speech production in young deaf children. Journal of Communication Disorders 1980; 12: 443–454
   Google Scholar
• Gnanadesikan A. Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. Constraints in phonological acquisition, R Kager, J Pater, W Zonneveld. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004; 73–108
   Google Scholar
• Gold T. Speech and hearing skills: a comparison between hard‐of‐hearing and deaf children. New York University, New York 1978, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Grogan M. L., Barker E. J., Dettman S. J., Blamey P. J. Phonetic and phonologic changes in the connected speech of children using a cochlear implant. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology 1995; 104((Suppl. 166))390–393
   Google Scholar
• Gustason G., Zawolkow E. G. Signing exact English. Modern Sign Press, Los Alamitos, CA 1993
   Google Scholar
• Hayes B., Kirchner R. Consonant lenition. Phonetically‐based phonology, R Kirchner, D Steriade. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004; 313–345
   Google Scholar
• Hock H. H. Principles of historical linguistics (2nd ed.). Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 1991
   Google Scholar
• Hyman L. Phonology: theory and analysis. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York 1975
   Google Scholar
• International Phonetic Association. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: a guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999
   Google Scholar
• Iverson G. K., Salmons J. C. On the typology of laryngeal neutralization: evolutionary phonology and laryngeal realism. Theoretical Linguistics 2006; 32: 205–216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobson R. Child language, aphasia and phonological universals (A. R. Keiler, Trans.). Mouton. (Original work published 1941), The Hague 1968
   Google Scholar
• Kager R. Optimality theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999
   Google Scholar
• Constraints in phonological acquisition, R Kager, J Pater, W Zonneveld. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004
   Google Scholar
• Kean M. L. Markedness: an overview. International encyclopedia of linguistics, 2, W Bright. Oxford University Press, New York 1992; 390–391
   Google Scholar
• Kirchner R. Synchronic chain shifts in optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry 1996; 27: 341–350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchner R. An effort‐based approach to consonant lenition. UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 1998, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Kirchner R. Phonological contrast and articulatory effort. Segmental phonology in optimality theory: constraints and representations, L Lombardi. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001; 79–117
   Google Scholar
• Kirk C., Demuth K. Onset/coda asymmetries in the acquisition of clusters. Proceedings of the annual Boston University conference on language development 2003; 27: 437–448
   Google Scholar
• Kirk K. L., Hill–Brown C. Speech and language results in children with a cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 1985; 6((Suppl.))36S–47S
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ladefoged P., Maddieson I. The sounds of the world's languages. Blackwell, Oxford 1996
   Google Scholar
• Lass R., Anderson J. Old English phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1975
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie L. M. Consonant strength: phonological patterns and phonetic manifestations (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics). Garland Publishing, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Macken M. A., Barton D. The acquisition of the voicing contrast in Spanish: a phonetic and phonology study of word‐initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language 1980; 7: 433–458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy J. A thematic guide to optimality theory (Research Surveys in Linguistics). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy J. Comparative markedness. Theoretical Linguistics 2003; 27: 1–51
   Google Scholar
• Miyamoto R. T., Kirk K. I., Svirsky M. A., Sehgal S. T. Communication skills in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Acta Oto‐Laryngologica 1999; 119: 219–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberger M. J., McGarr N. S. Speech production characteristics of the hearing impaired. Speech and language: advances in basic research and practice, N Lass. Academic Press, New York 1983; 223–233
   Google Scholar
• Pan H. The voicing contrasts of Taiwanese (Amoy) initial stops: data from adults and children. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 1994, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Parker S. G. Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. 2002, Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst. Distributed by Graduate Linguistics Students' Association, University of Massachusetts Amherst
   Google Scholar
• Pater J. Minimal violation and phonological development. Language Acquisition 1997; 6: 201–253
   Google Scholar
• Prince A., Smolensky P. Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA 2004
   Google Scholar
• Sehgal S. T., Kirk K. I., Svirsky M., Ertmer D. J., Osberger M. J. Imitative consonant feature production by children with multichannel sensory aids. Ear and Hearing 1998; 19: 72–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serry T., Blamey P. A 4‐year investigation into phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1999; 42: 141–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serry T., Blamey P., Grogan M. Phoneme acquisition in the first 4 years of implant use. The American Journal of Otology 1997; 18((Suppl.))S122–S124
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smit A. B., Hand L., Freilinger J. J., Bernthal J. E., Bird A. The Iowa articulation norms project and its Nebraska replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1990; 55: 779–798
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smolensky P. On the comprehension/ production dilemma in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 1996; 27: 720–731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stites J., Demuth K., Kirk C. Markedness vs. frequency effects in coda acquisition. Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 2004; 28: 565–576
   Google Scholar
• Stoel‐Gammon C., Cooper J. A. Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language 1984; 2: 247–271
   Google Scholar
• Svirsky M. A., Robbins A. M., Kirk K. L., Pisoni D. B., Miyamoto R. T. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychological Science 2000; 11: 153–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesar B., Smolensky P. The learnability of optimality theory: an algorithm and some basic complexity results. University of Colorado, Department of Computer Science. ROA‐2, Boulder, CO 1993, (Tech. Rep. No. CU‐CS‐678‐93)
   Google Scholar
• Tobey E. A., Pancamo S., Staller S. J., Brimacombe J. A., Beiter A. L. Consonant production in children receiving a multichannel cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 1991; 12: 23–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaux B., Samuels B. Laryngeal markedness and aspiration. Phonology 2005; 22: 395–436
   Google Scholar
• Vennemann T. Preference laws for syllable structure and the explanation of sound change: with special reference to German, German, Italian, and Latin. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York 1988
   Google Scholar
• Weiner F. Phonological process analysis. University Park Press, Baltimore, MD 1979
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B. S. Strategies for representing speech information with cochlear implants. Cochlear implants: Principles and practices, J. K Niparko, K. I Kirk, N. K Mellon, A McConkey Robbins, D. L Tucci, B. S Wilson. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2000; 129–170
   Google Scholar