Perception of speech simulating different configurations of hearing loss in normal hearing individuals

References

• American National Standard Institute. American national standard maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric rooms (ANSI S3.1‐1991). ANSI, New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• Baer T., Moore B. C. J., Kluk K. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 2002; 112: 1133–1144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldridge J. Linguistic and social characteristics of Indian English. Language in India 2002; 2: 1–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bilger R. C., Wang M. D. Consonant confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1976; 19: 738–748
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A. Speech perception and sensorineural hearing loss in auditory management of hearing impaired children. Auditory management of hearing impaired children, M Ross, T Giolas. University Park Press, Baltimore 1978; 117–143
   Google Scholar
• Ching T. Y., Dillon H., Byrne D. Speech recognition of hearing‐impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high‐frequency amplifications. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 1998; 103: 1128–1140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geetha C., George A., Yathiraj A. Perception of high frequency filtered speech in normal hearing subjects. The Journal of the Indian Speech and Hearing Association 2006; 20: 47–51
   Google Scholar
• Goetzinger G. Word discrimination testing. Handbook of clinical audiology, J Katz. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1978; 157–178, 2nd ed
   Google Scholar
• Hogan C. A., Turner C. W. High frequency audibility: benefits for hearing‐impaired listeners. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 1998; 104: 432–441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby B. W. Y., Ricketts T. A. The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high‐ and low‐frequency speech information to speech understanding. Journal of Acoustic Society of America 2003; 113: 1706–1717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby B. W. Y., Ricketts T. A. The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high‐ and low‐frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 2006; 119: 1752–1763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Jerger S. Diagnostic significance of PB word functions. Archives of Otolaryngology 1971; 93: 573–580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, Kaplan. A manual of basic audiometry. Audiometric interpretation, L. L Lloyd, H Kaplan. University Park Press, Baltimore 1978, 2nd ed, Allyn & Bacon
   Google Scholar
• Martin M. Speech audiometry. Whurr Publication, London 1987
   Google Scholar
• Miller G. A., Nicely P. E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants,. Journal of Acoustic Society of America 1955; 27: 338–352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C. J. Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implication for the fitting of hearing aids. Trend in Amplification 2001; 5: 1–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Owens E., Schubert E. D. Development of California Consonant test. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1977; 20: 463–474
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Owens E., Benedict M., Schubert E. D. Consonant phonemic errors associated with pure‐tone configuration and certain kinds of hearing impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1972; 15: 308–322
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pavlovic C. V. Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 1984; 75: 1253–1258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlovic C., Studebaker G., Scherbecoe R. An articulation index based on procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing‐impaired individuals. Journal of Acoustic Society of America 1986; 80: 50–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R. D., Lang J. K., Levitt H. Speech reception with low‐frequency speech energy. Journal of Acoustic Society of America 1975; 57: 949–955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivaprasad B. Binaural fusion test developed in English. 2006, Unpublished dissertation, University of Mysore, Mysore
   Google Scholar
• Studebaker G. A., Sherbecoe R. L., McDaniel D. M., Gray G. A. Age‐related changes in monosyllabic word recognition performance when audibility is held constant. Journal of American Academy of Audiology 1997; 8: 150–162
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner C. W., Brus S. L. Providing low‐ and mid‐frequency speech information to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 2001; 109: 2999–3006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C. W., Cummings K. J. Speech audibility for listeners with high‐frequency hearing loss. American Journal of Audiology 1999; 8: 47–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vickers D. A., Moore B. C. J., Baer T. Effects of low‐pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 2001; 110: 1164–1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar