Promoting lexical learning in the speech and language therapy of children with cochlear implants

References

• Atkinson J. & Heritage J. (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaiser, K. M., Nelson, P. B., & Kohnert, K. (2014). Effect of repeated exposures on word learning in quiet and noise. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 24, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cornett, R. O. & Daisey, M. E. (1992). The cued speech resource book for parents of deaf children. Raleigh, NC: National Cued Speech Association.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, L. S., Geers, A. E., & Nicholas, J. G. (2014). The effects of audibility and novel word learning ability on vocabulary level in children with cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants International, 15, 211–221.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, D. J., Kloiber, D. T., Jung, J., Kirleis, K. C., & Bradford, D. (2012). Consonant production accuracy in young cochlear implant recipients: Developmental sound classes and word position effects. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 342–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estabrooks, W. (2006). Auditory-verbal therapy and practice. In W. Estabrooks (Ed.), Auditory-verbal therapy and practice (pp. 1–22). Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing.
   Google Scholar
• Faes, J., Gillis, J., & Gillis, S. (2016). Phonemic accuracy development in children with cochlear implants up to five years of age by using Levenshtein distance. Journal of Communication Disorders, 59, 40–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, M. K. & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Hearing experience and receptive vocabulary development in deaf children with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15, 149–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar, M. J. (1990). Discourse and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language, 17, 607–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1998). Social and cognitive competencies in learning: Which is which? In I. Hutchby & J. Ellis (Eds.), Children and social competence. Arenas of action (pp. 115–133). London, UK: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (2005). A comparison of a mother and a therapist working on child speech. In K. Richards & P. Seedhaus (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 56–72). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (2009). Applying conversation analysis to interactions with atypically developing children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23, 551–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers, A. E. & Nicholas, J. N. (2012). Enduring advantages of early cochlear implantation for spoken language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 643–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers, A. E., Brenner, C., & Davidson, L. S. (2003). Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five. Ear & Hearing, 24, 24S–35S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283‒307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haakana, M., Laakso, M., & Lindström, J. (2009). Transcription and glossing symbols. In M. Haakana, M. Laakso & J. Lindström (Eds.), Talk in interaction: Comparative dimensions (pp. 1–14). Helsinki: SKS Finnish Literature Society.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, H., Geers, A. E., Treiman, R., & Moog, J. S. (2009). Receptive vocabulary development in deaf children with cochlear implants: Achievements in an intensive auditory-oral educational setting. Ear & Hearing, 30, 128–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 86–100). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (2010). Children’s emerging and developing self-repair practices. In H. Gardner & M. Forrester (Eds.), Analysing interactions in childhood. Insights from conversation analysis (pp. 74–99). London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. & Klippi, A. (1999). A closer look at the hint and guess sequences in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 13, 345–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. & Soininen, M. (2010). Mother-initiated repair sequences in interactions of 3-year-old children. First Language, 30, 329–353.
   Google Scholar
• Lonka, E., Hasan, M., & Komulainen, E. (2011). Spoken language skills and educational placement in Finnish children with cochlear implants. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 63, 296–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynas, W. (1994). Communication options in the education of deaf children. London, UK: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon, M. (2009). Interactions between a deaf child for whom English as an additional language and his specialist teacher in the first year at school: Combining words and gestures. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23, 611‒629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHoul, A. (1990). The organization of repair on classroom talk. Language in Society, 19, 349–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Social organization in the classroom. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, J. G. & Geers, A. E. (2007). Will they catch up? The role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe to profound hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1048–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajo, K. (2013). Joint multimodal management of hearing impairment in conversations at home: Implications for communication therapy. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, J., Ireson, J., & Mahon, M. (2012). The organization of repair in SSLD classroom discourse: how to express the trouble source. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 3(2), 171–193.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley, J., Radford, J., & Mahon, M. (2002). How do teachers manage topic and repair? Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 18, 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ronkainen, R. (2011). Enhancing listening and imitation skills in children with cochlear implants - the use of multimodal resources in speech and language therapy. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 2(2), 261–285.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. G., Steinman, S., Ying, E., Ying Mystal, E., & Houstom, D. M. (2013). Language processing in children with cochlear implants: A preliminary report on lexical access for production and comprehension. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27, 264–277.
   Google Scholar
• Sellman, J. (2008). Vuorovaikutus ääniterapiassa: Keskustelunanalyyttinen tutkimus harjoittelun rakenteesta, terapeutin antamasta palautteesta ja oppimisesta [Interaction in voice therapy. A conversation analytic study of voice training, therapist’s feedback and learning]. Helsinki, Finland: Department of Speech Sciences, University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis. An introduction. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tarplee, C. (1996). Working on young children’s utterances. Prosodic aspects of repetition during picture labeling. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 406–435). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarplee, C. (2010). Next turn and intersubjectivity in children’s language acquisition. In H. Gardner and M. Forrester (Eds.), Analysing interactions in childhood. Insights from conversation analysis (pp. 3–22). London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Teinonen, T., Fellman, V., Näätänen, R., Alku, P., & Huotilainen, M. (2009). Statistical language learning in neonates revealed by event-related brain potentials. BMC Neuroscience, 10, 21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tykkyläinen, T. (2005). Puheterapeutti ja lapsi puheterapiatehtävää tekemässä. Ohjailevan toiminnan tarkastelua [A speech and language therapist and a child performing a speech therapy task: Analysing interaction in directive sequences]. Helsinki, Finland: Department of Speech Sciences, University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Tykkyläinen, T. (2009). Task setting at home and in speech and language therapy. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 25, 319‒340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Woude, J., & Barton, E. (2001). Specialized corrective repair sequences: Shared book reading with children with histories of specific language impairment. Discourse Processes, 32, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanormelingen, L., De Mayer, S., & Gillis, S. (2015). Interaction patterns of mothers of children with different degrees of hearing: Normally hearing children and congenitally hearing-impaired children with a cochlear implant. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 79, 520–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlastarakos, P. V., Proikas, K., Papacharalampous, G., Exadaktylou, I., Mochloulis, G., & Nikolopoulos, T. P. (2010). Cochlear implantation under the first year of age—The outcomes. A critical systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 74, 119–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, E. A. (2010). Word learning processes in children with cochlear implants. (PhD [Doctor of Philosophy] thesis). University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, P., & Leybaert, (2009). Phonological short term memory in deaf children fitted with a cochlear implant: effects of a phonological similarity, word length and lipreading cues. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 29, 2, 174–185.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. S., & Dorman, M. F. (2008). Cochlear implants: Current designs and future possibilities. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 45, 695–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, T. P., Moran, C., & Foster-Cohen, S. (2012). The effects of expansions, questions and cloze procedures on children’s conversational skills. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 26, 273–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar