Comprehension of presuppositions in school-age Cantonese-speaking children with and without autism spectrum disorders

References

• Abusch, D. (2002). Lexical alternatives as a source of pragmatic presuppositions. In B. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory 12 (pp. 1–19). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Amaral, P., & Cummins, C. (2015). A cross-linguistic study on information backgrounding and presupposition projection. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions (pp. 157–172). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R., Feldman, L., & Schreuder, R. (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 290–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D., Cortese, M., Sergent-Marshall, S., Spieler, D., & Yap, M. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A 15 year review. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 3–20). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beaver, D., & Condoravdi, C. (2003). A uniform analysis of ‘before’ and ‘after’. In R. B. Young & Y. Zhou (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory 13 (pp. 37–54). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L. L.-S. & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 509–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chierchia, G., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1990). Meaning and grammar: An introduction to semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Destruel, E., Velleman, D., Onea, E., Bumford, D., Xue, J., & Beaver D. (2015). A cross-linguistic study of the non-at-issueness of exhaustive inferences. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions (pp. 135–156). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbinson, S., Perkins, M. R., & Boucher, J. (1998). Structural patterns in conversations with a woman who has autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 113–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Pérez, R. M., Lee, A., & Hobson, R. P. (2006). On intersubjective engagement in autism: A controlled study of nonverbal aspects of conversation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1310–1322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, C., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2005). Brief report: The relationship between discourse deficits and autism symptomatology. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 519–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinämäki, O. (1974). Semantics of English temporal connectives (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogenhout, M. & Malcolm-Smith, S (2014). Theory of mind in autism spectrum disorder: Does DSM classification predict development? Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 597–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, L. (1969). A presuppositional analysis of only and even. In R. I. Binnick, A. Davison, G. M. Green, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 98–107). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, Department of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Howlin, P. (2004). Autism and Asperger syndrome: Preparing for adulthood (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jayez, J., Mongelli, V., Reboul, A., & van der Henst, J. B. (2015). Weak and strong triggers. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions (pp. 173–193). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Karttunen, L. (1971). Implicative verbs. Language, 47, 340–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karttunen, L. (1973). Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 169–193.
   Google Scholar
• Karttunen, L. (1974). Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics, 1, 181–194.
   Google Scholar
• Karttunen, L. (2016). Presupposition: What went wrong? In M. Moroney, C. R. Little, J. Collard, & D. Burgdorf (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory 26 (pp. 705–731). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C. S. (2015). Presupposition satisfaction, locality and discourse constituency. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions (pp. 109–134). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, P., & Kiparsky, C. (1970). Fact. In M. Bierwisch & K. E. Heidolph (Eds.), Progress in linguistics (pp. 143–173). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Langendoen, D. T., & Savin, H. (1971). The projection problem for presuppositions. In C. J. Fillmore & D. T. Langendoen (Eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics (pp. 373–388). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, C., & Paul, R. (1997). Language and communication in autism. In D. J. Cohen & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (2nd ed., pp. 195–225). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, S. (1992). On the role of reasoning about change in the projection of presuppositions (Report 234). IWBS, IBM Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, S., & Yip, V. (2011). Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. L. (1969). On the treatment of presupposition in transformational grammar. In R. I. Binnick, A. Davison, G. M. Green, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), The Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 167–177). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, Department of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J. (1981). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Research supplement no. 1: The 1979 British standardisation of the standard progressive matrices and mill hill vocabulary scales, together with comparative data from earlier studies in the UK, US, Canada, Germany, and Ireland. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press/San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J. (1989). The Raven progressive matrices: A review of national norming studies and ethnic and socioeconomic variation within the United States. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter, M. R., & Schopler, E. (1987). Autism and pervasive developmental disorders: Concepts and diagnostic issues. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 159–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, F., & Tiemann, S. (2017). Presupposition projection in online processing. Journal of Semantics, 34(1), 61–106.
   Google Scholar
• Scoville, R. P., & Gordon, A. M. (1980). Children’s understanding of factive presuppositions: An experiment and a review. Journal of Child Language, 7, 381–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, M. (2001). On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In R. Hastings, B. Jackson, & Z. Zvolensky (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory 11 (pp. 431–448). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 447–457.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. Munitz & P. Unger (Eds.), Semantics and philosophy (pp. 197–214). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (1998). On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 7, 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (2002). Common ground. Linguistics & Philosophy, 25, 701–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. (1950). On referring. Mind, 59, 320–344.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. (1952). Introduction to logical theory. London, UK: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Tager-Flusberg, H. (1981). On the nature of linguistic functioning in early infantile autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 11, 45–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tager-Flusberg, H. (1996). Brief report: Current theory and research on language and communication in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 169–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T’sou, B. K. Y., Lee, T., Tung, P., Chan, A., Man, Y., & To, C. K. S. (2006). Hong Kong Cantonese oral language assessment scale. Hong Kong, China: Language Information Sciences Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Volden, J. (2004). Conversational repair in speakers with autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39, 171–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkmar, F., Klin, A., Schultz, R., Bronen, R., Marans, W., Sparrow, S., & Cohen, D. J. (1996). Grand rounds: Asperger syndrome. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 118–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Fintel, K. (2008). What is presupposition accommodation, again? Philosophical Perspectives, 22, 137–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M. (1998). Profiles of language and communication skills in autism. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 4, 73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, L., Fan, Y., Zhao, J., Huang, D., Li, Y., & Zou, X. (2013). Atypical understanding of mental terms in Chinese-speaking children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 1411–1417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziatas, K., Durkin, K., & Pratt, C. (1998). Belief term development in children with autism, Asperger syndrome, specific language impairment, and normal development: Links to theory of mind development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 755–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar