Word-learning performance of children with and without cochlear implants given synchronous and asynchronous cues

References

• Bahrick, L. E., Lickliter, R., & Flom, R. (2004). Intersensory redundancy guides the development of selective attention, perception, and cognition in infancy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 99–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeson, T. R., Houston, D. M., & Miyamoto, R. (2010). Effects of congenital hearing loss and cochlear implantation on audiovisual speech perception in infants and children. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 28, 157–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, L. S., Geers, A. E., & Nicholas, J. G. (2014). The effects of audibility and novel word learning ability on vocabulary level in children with cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants International, 15, 211–221.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fenson, L., Marchman, V., Thal, D., Dale, P., Reznick, S., & Bates, E. (2006). The MacArthur Bates communicative development inventories: User’s guide and technical manual (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Fernald, A. (1989). Intonation and communicative intent in mothers’ speech to infants: Is the melody the message? Child Development, 60, 1497–1510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogate, L. J., & Bahrick, L. E. (1998). Intersensory redundancy facilitates learning of arbitrary relations between vowel sounds and objects in seven-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Gogate, L. J., Bahrick, L. E., & Watson, J. D. (2000). A study of multimodal motherese: The role of temporal synchrony between verbal labels and gestures. Child Development, 71, 878–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogate, L. J., Bolzani, L. H., & Betancourt, E. A. (2006). Attention to maternal multimodal naming by 6- to 8-month-old infants and learning of word-object relations. Infancy, 9, 259–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heibeck, T. H., & Markman, E. M. (1987). Word learning in children: An examination of fast mapping. Child Development, 58, 1021–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, D. M., Beer, J., Bergeson, T., Chin, S. B., Pisoni, D., & Miyamoto, R. T. (2012). The ear is connected to the brain: Some new directions in the study of children with cochlear implants at Indiana University. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 23, 446–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, D. M., Stewart, J., Moberly, A., Hollich, G., & Miyamoto, R. T. (2012). Word learning in deaf children with cochlear implants: Effects of early auditory experience. Developmental Science, 15, 448–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston-Price, C., Plunkett, K., & Harris, P. (2005). ‘Word learning wizardry’ at 1;6. Journal of Child Language, 32, 175–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühn-Inacker, H., Weichbold, V., Tsiakpini, L., Coninx, S., & D’Haese, P. (2004). LittlEars: Auditory questionnaire. Innsbruck, Austria: MED-EL.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, S., Levesque, J., & Champoux, F. (2012). Brain plasticity an obstacle for cochlear implant rehabilitation. The Hearing Journal, 65, 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, E. (2016). Vocabulary knowledge of children with cochlear implants: A meta-analysis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 21, 107–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, E., & Schuele, C. M. (2015). Synchrony of maternal auditory and visual cues about unknown words to children with and without cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 36(2), 229–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matatyaho, D. J., & Gogate, L. J. (2008). Type of maternal object motion during synchronous naming predicts preverbal infants’ learning of word-object relations. Infancy, 13, 172–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matatyaho-Bullaro, D. J., Gogate, L. J., Mason, Z., Cadavid, S., & Abdel-Mottaleb, M. (2014). Type of object motion facilitates word mapping by preverbal infants. Journal of Experimental Child Pscyhology, 118, 27–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singleton, N. C. (2012). Can semantic enrichment lead to naming in a word extension task? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 279–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L., & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition, 106(3), 1558–1568.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, J., & Bricker, D. (2009). The ages & stages questionnaire. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L. (2013). A corpus of consonant-vowel-consonant real words and nonwords: Comparison of phonotactic probability, neighborhood density, and consonant age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 44. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0309-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomblin, J. B., Barker, B. A., & Hubbs, S. (2007). Developmental constraints on language development in children with cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology, 46, 512–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, E., & McGregor, K. (2013). Word learning processes in children with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 375–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilstedt-Svensson, U., Lofqvist, A., Almqvist, B., & Birgitta, S. (2004). Is age at implant the only factor that counts? The influence of working memory on lexical and grammatical development in children with cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology, 43, 506–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar