Effects of lexical stress on aphasic word production

References

• Phonological rhythm: definition, and development In G.H. Yeni-Komshian, Kavanagh J.P. and G.A. Ferguson (Eds), Child Phonology, Vol. 1: Production (New York: Academic Press).
   Google Scholar
• BLACK, M., and BYNG, S., 1986, Prosodic constraints on lexical access in reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 369–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BLACK, M., and BYNG, S., 1989, Re-stressing prosody: a reply to Cutler, Howard and Patterson. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingston J.and Beckman M.E. (Eds), Papers in Laboratory Phonology. I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 341–376.
   Google Scholar
• BUTTERWORTH, B., 1992, Disorders of phonological encoding. Cognition, 42, 261–286. CAPLAN, D., 1992, Language, Structure, Processing and Disorders (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• COLTHEART, M., 1981, The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COLTHEART, M., MASTERSON, J., BYNG, S., PRIOR, M., and RIDDOCH, J., 1983, Surface dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 469–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler A.(Ed.), Slips of the Tongue and Language Production (Berlin: Mouton), pp. 663–716.
   Google Scholar
• Fromkin V.A. (Ed.), Errors in Linguistic Performance (New York: Academic Press).
   Google Scholar
• CUTLER, A., 1986, Forbear is a homophone lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. Language and Speech, 29, 201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CUTLER, A., 1989, Auditory lexical access: where do we start? In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical Representation and Process (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 342–356.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann G.T.M. (Ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 105-121.
   Google Scholar
• CUTLER, A., and BUTTERFIELD, S., 1992, Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 218–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CUTLER, A., and CARTER, D.M., 1987, The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133–142.
   Google Scholar
• CUTLER, A., and Foss, D.J., 1977, On the role of sentence stress in sentence processing Language and Speech, 20, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• CUTLER, A., and NORRIS, D.G., 1988, The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CUTLER, A., HOWARD, D., and PATTERSON, K.E., 1989, Misplaced stress On prosody a reply to Black and Byng. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DE JONG, K., BECKMAN, M.E., and EDWARDS, J., 1993, The interplay between prosodic structure and coarticulation. Language and Speech, 36, 197–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DELATTRE, P., 1966, A comparison of syllable length conditioning amongst languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics, IV, 183–198.
   Google Scholar
• DELL, G.S., 1986, A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DELL, G.S., 1989, The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical Representation and Process (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 136–165.
   Google Scholar
• EcHoLs, C.H. and NEWPORT, E.L., 1992, The role of stress and position in determining first words. Language Acquisition, 2, 189–220.
   Google Scholar
• GERKEN, L.A., 1990, Do adults and children have different feet? Chicago Linguistics Society, 26, 116–128.
   Google Scholar
• GERKEN, L.A., 1991, The metrical basis for children's subjectless sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 431–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GERKEN, L.A., 1994a, Young children's representation of prosodic phonology evidence from English-speakers' weak syllable productions Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• GERKEN, L.A., 1994b, A metrical template account of children's weak syllable omissions from multisyllabic words. Journal of Child Language, 21, 565–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanner E.and Gleitman L.(Eds), Language Acquisition: the state of the art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• GOODGLASS, H., FODOR, I.G., and SCHULHOFF, C.L., 1967, Prosodic factors in grammar-evidence from aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 10, 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• HURA, C.L., and EcHoLs, C.H., 1996, The role of stress and articulatory difficulty in children's early productions Developmental Psychology, 32, 165–176.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher P.and M. Garman(Eds), Language Acquisition: Studies in first language development, 2nd edn(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• KU6ERA, H., and FRANCIS, W.N., 1967, A computational analysis of present day American English (Providence, RI: Brown University Press).
   Google Scholar
• LEVELT, W.J.M., 1989, Speaking: From intention to articulation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). LEVELT, W.J.M., 1992, Accessing words in speech production: stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEVELT, W.J.M., and WHEELDON, L., 1994, Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEHTA, C., and PAUL, N., 1992, StatXact-Turbo: User Manual (Cambridge, MA: Cytel Software Corporation).
   Google Scholar
• MICELI, G., and CARAMAZZA, A., 1993, The assignment of word stress in oral reading: evidence from a case of acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 273–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MONSELL, S., DOYLE, M.C., and HAGGARD, P.N., 1989, The effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICKELS, L.A., 1992, Spoken word production and its breakdown in aphasia. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• NICKELS, L.A., 1995, Getting it right? Using aphasic naming errors to evaluate theoreticalmodels of spoken word production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 13–45. NICKELS, L.A., 1997, Spoken word production and its breakdown in aphasia (Hove, UK:Psychology Press).
   Google Scholar
• NICKELS, L.A., and HOWARD, D., 1994, A frequent occurrence? Factors affecting the produc-tion of semantic errors in aphasic naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 289–320. NICKELS, L.A., and HOWARD, D., 1995a, Aphasic naming: what matters? Neuropsychologia,33, 1281–1303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICKELS, L.A., and HOWARD, D., 1995b, Phonological errors in aphasic naming: comprehen-sion, monitoring and lexicality. Cortex, 31, 209–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIEMI, J., KOIVUSELKA-SALLINEN, P., and HANNINEN, R., 1985, Phoneme errors in Broca's aphasia: three Finnish cases. Brain and Language, 26, 28–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PATE, D.S., SAFFRAN, E.M., and MARTIN, N., 1987, Specifying the nature of the productiondeficit in conduction aphasia: a case study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2,43–84.
   Google Scholar
• PATTERSON, K.E., 1980, Reading errors of PW and DE. In Coltheart M., Pattersonand K.E. Marshall J.C. (Eds), Deep Dyslexia (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul). SHATTUCK-HUFNAGEL, S., 1992, The role of word structure in segmental serial ordering.Cognition, 42, 213–259.
   Google Scholar
• SMITH, N.V., 1973, The Acquisition of Phonology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). SPENCER, A., 1991, Morphological Theory: an introduction to word structure in generative grammar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• STEMBERGER, J.P., 1988, Between-word processes in child phonology. Journal of Child Language, 15, 39–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg J.H. (Ed.), Universals of Human Language, Vol. 2: Phonology (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Peranteau P.M., Levi J.N. and Phares G.C. (Eds), Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 607–615.
   Google Scholar