37
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Implicit Graphemes Learning among Poor Readers

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 485-499 | Received 15 Nov 2023, Accepted 03 Apr 2024, Published online: 15 Apr 2024

References

  • Arciuli, J. (2018). Reading as statistical learning. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3S), 634–643. doi:10.1044/2018_LSHSS-STLT1-17-0135
  • Arciuli, J., & Conway, C. M. (2018). The promise—and challenge—of statistical learning for elucidating atypical language development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 492–500. doi:10.1177/0963721418779977
  • Bara, F., Morin, M. F., Alamargot, D., & Bosse, M. L. (2016). Learning different allographs through handwriting: The impact on letter knowledge and reading acquisition. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 88–94. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.020
  • Bogaerts, L., Siegelman, N., & Frost, R. (2021). Statistical learning and language impairments: Toward more precise theoretical accounts. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 16(2), 319–337. doi:10.1177/1745691620953082
  • Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child’s acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 313–321. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.313
  • Chetail, F. (2017). What do we do with what we learn? Statistical learning of orthographic regularities impacts written word processing. Cognition, 163, 103–120. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.015
  • Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18(2), 116–125. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.1995.tb00077.x
  • Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5–21. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.819356
  • Ehri, L. C. (2020). The science of learning to read words: A case for systematic phonics instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S45–S60. doi:10.1002/rrq.334
  • Fletcher, M. J., & Denton, C. (2003). Validity of alternative approaches to the identification of L.D.: operationalizing unexpected underachievement. The National Research Center on Learning Disabilities: Symposium focusing on responsiveness-to-intervention, 1–11.
  • Folia, V., Uddén, J., Forkstam, C., Ingvar, M., Hagoort, P., & Petersson, K. M. (2008). Implicit learning and dyslexia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145(1), 132–150. doi:10.1196/annals.1416.012
  • Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, J. Marshall & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). London: Erlbaum.
  • Gabay, Y., Thiessen, E. D., & Holt, L. L. (2015). Impaired statistical learning in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 58(3), 934–945. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0324
  • Gentry, J. R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling in” GNYS AT WRK. The Reading Teacher, 36(2), 192–200.
  • Georgiou, G. K., Martinez, D., Vieira, A. P. A., & Guo, K. (2021). Is orthographic knowledge a strength or a weakness in individuals with dyslexia? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Annals of Dyslexia, 71(1), 5–27. doi:10.1007/s11881-021-00220-6
  • Ise, E., Arnoldi, C. J., Bartling, J., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2012). Implicit learning in children with spelling disability: Evidence from artificial grammar learning. Journal of Neural Transmission (Vienna, Austria: 1996), 119(9), 999–1010. doi:10.1007/s00702-012-0830-y
  • Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Israel statistical yearbook (No.72) (in Hebrew). https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/publications/DocLib/2022/shnaton2022.pdf.
  • Jiménez, E. J., Siegel, S. L., & López, R. M. (2003). The relationship between I.Q and reading disabilities in English- speaking Canadian and Spanish Children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(1), 15–23. doi:10.1177/00222194030360010301
  • Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. C. (2002). Learning disabilities. In E. J. Mash, & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Child psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 520–586). New York: Guilford.
  • Nigro, L., Jiménez-Fernández, G., Simpson, I. C., & Defior, S. (2015). Implicit learning of written regularities and its relation to literacy acquisition in a shallow orthography. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(5), 571–585. doi:10.1007/s10936-014-9303-9
  • Pacheco, A., Reis, A., Araújo, S., Inácio, F., Petersson, K. M., & Faísca, L. (2014). Dyslexia heterogeneity: Cognitive profiling of Portuguese children with dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 27(9), 1529–1545. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9504-5
  • Pavlidou, E. V., & Williams, J. M. (2014). Implicit learning and reading: Insights from typical children and children with developmental dyslexia using the artificial grammar learning (AGL) paradigm. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(7), 1457–1472. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.040
  • Reis, A., Araújo, S., Morais, I. S., & Faísca, L. (2020). Reading and reading-related skills in adults with dyslexia from different orthographic systems: A review and meta-analysis. Annals of Dyslexia, 70(3), 339–368. doi:10.1007/s11881-020-00205-x
  • Schmalz, X., Moll, K., Mulatti, C., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2019). Is statistical learning ability related to reading ability, and if so, why? Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 64–76. doi:10.1080/10888438.2018.1482304
  • Siegelman, N. (2020). Statistical learning abilities and their relation to language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14(3), e12365. doi:10.1111/lnc3.12365
  • Singh, S., & Conway, C. M. (2021). Unraveling the interconnections between statistical learning and dyslexia: A review of recent empirical studies. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 734179. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.734179
  • Snowling, M. J. (2001). From language to reading and dyslexia 1. Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 7(1), 37–46. doi:10.1002/dys.185
  • Steffler, D. J. (2001). Implicit cognition and spelling development. Developmental Review, 21(2), 168–204. doi:10.1006/drev.2000.0517
  • Taha, H. (2023). Differences in detecting statistical visual regularities between typical and poor readers. Reading Psychology, 44(6), 604–622. doi:10.1080/02702711.2023.2179143
  • Taha, H., & Khateeb, H. (2018). Statistical learning and orthographic preferences among native-Arab kindergarten and first graders. Writing Systems Research, 10(1), 15–25. doi:10.1080/17586801.2018.1473313
  • Taha, H., Ibrahim, R., & Khateb, A. (2014). Exploring the phenotype of phonological reading disability as a function of the phonological deficit severity: Evidence from the error analysis paradigm in Arabic. Reading Psychology, 35(7), 683–701. doi:10.1080/02702711.2013.801060
  • Tong, S., Zhang, P., & He, X. (2020). Statistical learning of orthographic regularities in Chinese children with and without dyslexia. Child Development, 91(6), 1953–1969. doi:10.1111/cdev.13384
  • Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2011). Similarities among the shapes of writing and their effects on learning. Written Language and Literacy, 14(1), 39–57. doi:10.1075/wll.14.1.03tre
  • Treiman, R., Gordon, J., Boada, R., Peterson, R. L., & Pennington, B. F. (2014). Statistical learning, letter reversals, and reading. Scientific Studies of Reading: The Official Journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 18(6), 383–394. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.873937
  • Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 45(1), 2–40. doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x
  • Vicari, S., Marotta, L., Menghini, D., Molinari, M., & Petrosini, L. (2003). Implicit learning deficit in children with developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 41(1), 108–114. doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00082-9
  • von Koss Torkildsen, J., Arciuli, J., & Wie, O. B. (2019). Individual differences in statistical learning predict children’s reading ability in a semi-transparent orthography. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 60–68. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.003

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.