Prediction of Changes in Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity Function by Tissue Redness after Pterygium Surgery

References

• Öner V, Taş M, Özkaya E, Bulut A. Influence of pterygium on corneal biomechanical properties. Curr Eye Res 2015 Oct;16:1–4, epub ahead of print.
   Google Scholar
• Anguria P, Kitinya J, Ntuli S, Carmichael T. The role of heredity in pterygium development. Int J Ophthalmol 2014;7:563–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin A, Stern GA. Correlation between pterygium size and induced corneal astigmatism. Cornea 1998;17:28–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad-Salih PAK, Sharif AFMD. Analysis of pterygium size and induced corneal astigmatism. Cornea 2008;27:434–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coroneo MT. Pterygium as an early indicator of ultraviolet insolation: A hypothesis. Br J Ophthalmol 1993;77:734–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coroneo MT, DiGirolamo N, Wakefield D. The pathogenesis of pterygia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1999;10:282–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kheirkhah A, Safi H, Nazari R, Kaghazkanani R, Hashemi H, Behrouz MJ. Effects of pterygium surgery on front and back corneal astigmatism. Int Ophthalmol 2012;32:251–257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kheirkhah A, Safi H, Molaei S, Nazari R, Behrouz MJ, Raju VK. Effects of pterygium surgery on front and back corneal surfaces and anterior segment parameters. Can J Ophthalmol 2012;47:423–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari S. Pterygium-induced corneal refractive changes. Indian J Ophthalmol 2007;55:383–386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan DT, Chee S-P, Dear KGB, Lim ASM. Effect of pterygium morphology on pterygium recurrence in a controlled trial comparing conjunctival autografting with bare sclera excision. Arch of Ophthalmol 1997;115:1235–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahar PS, Manzar N. Pterygium recurrence related to its size and corneal involvement. J Coll Phys Surgeons 2013;23:120–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N. Grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998;18:182–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry RL, Schnider CM, Holden BA. et al. Standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:234–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze MM, Hutchings N, Simpson TL. Grading bulbar redness using cross-calibrated clinical grading scales. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:5812–5817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na R, Stender IM, Henriksen M, Wulf HC. Autofluorescence of human skin is age-related after correction for skin pigmentation and redness. J Invest Dermatol 2001;116:536–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond JS, Duncan JAL, Mason T, Sattar A, Boanas A, O’Kane S, Ferguson MWJ. Scar redness in humans: How long does it persist after incisional and excisional wounding? Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:487–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy P, Lau J, Sim M, Woods R. How redness is a white eye? Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperaemia. Eye 2007;21:633–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieguth P, Simpson T. Automated measurement of bulbar redness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:340–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen PCY, Kovalcheck SW, Zweifach BW. Analysis of microvascular network in bulbar conjunctiva image processing. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp 1987;6:245–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papas EB. Key factors in the subjective and objective assessment of conjunctival erythema. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 2000;41:687–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze MM, Jones DA, Simpson TL. The development of validated bulbar redness grading scales. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:976–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze MM, Hutchings, N, Simpson TL. The perceived bulbar redness of clinical grading scales. Optom Vis Sci 2009;84:E1250–E1258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze MM, Hutchings, N, Simpson TL. The use of fractal analysis and photometry to estimate the accuracy of bulbar redness grading scales. Optom Vis Sci 2008;49:1398–1406.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson RC, Wolffsohn JS. Objective grading of the anterior eye. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86:273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villumsen J, Ringquist J, Alm A. Image analysis of conjunctival hyperaemia: A personal computer based system. Acta Ophthalmol 1991;69:536–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen CG, Fitzke FW, Woodward EG. A new computer assisted objective method for quantifying vascular changes of the bulbar conjunctivae. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1996;16:430–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado M, Arnau V, Martinez-Costa R. et al. Reproducibility of digital image analysis for measuring corneal haze after myopic photo-refractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;123:31–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willingham FF, Cohen KL, Coggins JM, Tripoli NK, Ogle JW, Goldstein GM. Automatic quantitative measurement of ocular hyperemia. Curr Eye Res 1995;14:1101–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson TL, Chan A, Fonn D. Measuring ocular redness: First order (luminance and chromaticity) measurements provide more information than second order (spatial structure) measurements. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Shah D. Objective measurement of contact-lens induced conjunctival redness. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:596–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horak F, Berger U, Menapace R, et al. Quantification of conjunctival vascular reaction by digital imaging. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996;98:495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez JD, Johnston PR, Ousler GW 3rd, Smith LM, Abelson MB. Automated grading system for evaluation of ocular redness associated with dry eye. Clin Ophthalmol 2013;7:1197–1204.
   Google Scholar
• Altan-Yaycioglu R, Kucukerdonmez C, Karalezli A, Corak F, Akova YA. Astigmatic changes following pterygium removal: Comparison of 5 different methods. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61:104–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupont WD, Plummer WD. Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. Controlled Clin Trials 1998;19:589–601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McClenaghan N, Kimura A, Stark LR. An evaluation of the M&S technologies smart system II for visual acuity measurement in young visually-normal adults. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:218–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azemin MZC, Hilmi MR, Kamal MK. Supervised pterygium fibrovascular redness grading using generalized regression neural network. In Fujita H (Ed). New Trends in Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques (pp. 650–656). Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Che Azemin MZ, Hilmi MR, Mohd Tamrin MI, Mohd Kamal K. Fibrovascular redness grading using Gaussian process regression with radial basis function kernel. In Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES), 2014 IEEE Conference on 2014 Dec 8 (pp. 113–116). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Che Azemin MZ, Mohd Tamrin MI, Hilmi MR, Mohd Kamal K. GLCM texture analysis on different color space for pterygium grading. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 2015;10:6410–6413.
   Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS. Incremental nature of anterior eye grading scales determined by objective image analysis. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:1434–1438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomidokoro A, Miyata K, Sakaguchi Y, Samejima T, Tokunaga T, Oshika T. Effects of pterygium on corneal spherical power and astigmatism. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1568–1571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bal N, Kayaselçuk F, Pelit A, Bolat F, Demirhan B. Mast cell density in pterygium, and its association with ultraviolet exposure in different climatic conditions: a series of 140 cases. Turk Patoloji Derg 2006;22:11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst LW, Sebban A, Chant D. Pterygium recurrence time. Ophthalmology 1994;101:755–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar